Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by elche

As if some paranoid schizophrenic and illiterate like you would know anything.

says the ignorant ElChe wanabee

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by elche

As if some paranoid schizophrenic and illiterate like you would know anything.

says the ignorant ElChe wanabee

Why do you bother posting you fat queer troll?

You have nothing useful to add to any topic.

good work Harry, keep up with your good irony entertainment

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by elche

Aliens I tell you, aliens!

Incorrect.

It was Lizard People Aliens.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Who can deny that building 7 is not in free fall? Has any steel structured building ever collapsed like that due to fire? Has any steel structured building collapsed in free fall like the Twin Towers due to fire? Ever?
Forget all your foolish abuse and foul language that make you sound like a bunch of 8 year old schoolboys trying to outswear each other. Just post some examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Are you aware of any other buildings being hit by airliners and not falling? Post some examples.

By the way have you and bENT sorted out that discrepancy yet?

He says the planes didn't exist / didn't hit the buildings, you say that they did, and you both use your separate conclusions as proof of conspiracy.

You can't both be right, can you??

Google differences in Empire State Building construction versus Twin Towers and all your questions will be answered in like 5 seconds.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

False. Smaller planes, I said "airliners", and smaller buildings.

Anyway it was a trick question because no planes hit the WTC as has been conclusively proven by bENT's YouTube vids. Post some examples of actual airliners hitting actual buildings.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by elche

Aliens I tell you, aliens!

Incorrect.

It was Lizard People Aliens.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Who can deny that building 7 is not in free fall? Has any steel structured building ever collapsed like that due to fire? Has any steel structured building collapsed in free fall like the Twin Towers due to fire? Ever?
Forget all your foolish abuse and foul language that make you sound like a bunch of 8 year old schoolboys trying to outswear each other. Just post some examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Are you aware of any other buildings being hit by airliners and not falling? Post some examples.

By the way have you and bENT sorted out that discrepancy yet?

He says the planes didn't exist / didn't hit the buildings, you say that they did, and you both use your separate conclusions as proof of conspiracy.

You can't both be right, can you??

Not that fucking old tosh again.

Go back in the thread to try and learn the differences between a 35,000lb B25 and a 300,00lb 767.

And the difference in size between a ten story block of flats in Iran and at least 10 floors of the WTC.

You dick.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by elche

Aliens I tell you, aliens!

Incorrect.

It was Lizard People Aliens.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Who can deny that building 7 is not in free fall? Has any steel structured building ever collapsed like that due to fire? Has any steel structured building collapsed in free fall like the Twin Towers due to fire? Ever?
Forget all your foolish abuse and foul language that make you sound like a bunch of 8 year old schoolboys trying to outswear each other. Just post some examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Are you aware of any other buildings being hit by airliners and not falling? Post some examples.

By the way have you and bENT sorted out that discrepancy yet?

He says the planes didn't exist / didn't hit the buildings, you say that they did, and you both use your separate conclusions as proof of conspiracy.

You can't both be right, can you??

Not that fucking old tosh again.

Go back in the thread to try and learn the differences between a 35,000lb B25 and a 300,00lb 767.

And the difference in size between a ten story block of flats in Iran and at least 10 floors of the WTC.

You dick.

They're both planes Harry, admittedly one was a military plane. No there are no examples of airliners crashing into buildings so none have fallen due to being hit by a plane.
But the WTC was built to withstand being hit by an airliner.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

No there are no examples of airliners crashing into buildings so none have fallen due to being hit by a plane.

Except for, you know, the whole 9/11 thing.

Or have you come around to bENT's no planes / mass hypnosis / special effects thinking?

But the WTC was built to withstand being hit by an airliner.

But the Titanic was built to be unsinkable.

Ffs

Don't tell me you swallow the old 'it just hit an iceberg' bs, ant?

Well it did hit an iceberg...
















...but everyone knows that iceberg was put there by the Zionist Alien reptile people and their weather control machine and that James Cameron is in on the cover up.

This just to hand, a video of the Titanic hitting the iceberg:



And, fuck me, the real smoking gun:





Hitting the WTC!!!

Notice in that second pic you can see the controlled explosions.

What I find most puzzling there is that, if you look really closely, the photographer is focussing on the right tower.

Can you prove that the Titanic, driven by James Cameron, didn't hit the WTC as part of a conspiracy to gain a plot outline for a record grossing movie? No you can't.

And ask yourself this: why in all the other videos of the Titanic hitting other buildings none of them collapsed? Because no sequel, that's why!

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

No there are no examples of airliners crashing into buildings so none have fallen due to being hit by a plane.

Except for, you know, the whole 9/11 thing.

Or have you come around to bENT's no planes / mass hypnosis / special effects thinking?

But the WTC was built to withstand being hit by an airliner.

But the Titanic was built to be unsinkable.

No, there are no examples of buildings falling due to planes of any size crashing into them. Just as there are no examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.
Come on Ant, your turn to provide an example-
A steel building collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

No there are no examples of airliners crashing into buildings so none have fallen due to being hit by a plane.

Except for, you know, the whole 9/11 thing.

Or have you come around to bENT's no planes / mass hypnosis / special effects thinking?

But the WTC was built to withstand being hit by an airliner.

But the Titanic was built to be unsinkable.

No, there are no examples of buildings falling due to planes of any size crashing into them. Just as there are no examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.
Come on Ant, your turn to provide an example-
A steel building collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Here's an example of a building collapsing due to fire after a fuel laden 300,000lb airliner hit it.

I'm not sure what this "free fall" shit is, what do you expect it to do, stop on the way down for a quick smoke?

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Who can deny that building 7 is not in free fall?

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

Who can deny that building 7 is not in free fall?

Quite compelling.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

No, there are no examples of buildings falling due to planes of any size crashing into them. Just as there are no examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.
Come on Ant, your turn to provide an example-
A steel building collapsing in free fall due to fire.

I've already given you an example.

Can you prove that the Titanic movie wasn't mass hallucination designed to make the public forget that James Cameron was behind 9/11?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

No there are no examples of airliners crashing into buildings so none have fallen due to being hit by a plane.

Except for, you know, the whole 9/11 thing.

Or have you come around to bENT's no planes / mass hypnosis / special effects thinking?

But the WTC was built to withstand being hit by an airliner.

But the Titanic was built to be unsinkable.

No, there are no examples of buildings falling due to planes of any size crashing into them. Just as there are no examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.
Come on Ant, your turn to provide an example-
A steel building collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Here's an example of a building collapsing due to fire after a fuel laden 300,000lb airliner hit it.

I'm not sure what this "free fall" shit is, what do you expect it to do, stop on the way down for a quick smoke?

Now who's making bad jokes without a thought for all those who died?
You have no examples of any steel buildings apart from the WTC collapsing on themselves at the speed of gravity due to fire.
Don't you think this might mean something?

Yes, it means no other buildings have been hit by airliners like that other than the WTC.

The rest were hit by the Titanic. Not comparable.

Do you expect things to fall faster than the speed of gravity?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yes, it means no other buildings have been hit by airliners like that other than the WTC.

The rest were hit by the Titanic. Not comparable.

Do you expect things to fall faster than the speed of gravity?

No, i expect buildings collapsing due to fire to fall at less than the speed of gravity, as they do.
Several architects have stressed the WTC was built to withstand the impact of airliners crashing into it. Even several airliners.
And hey! Building 7 didn't have one airliner crash into it, yet down it went like a sack of potatoes at the speed of gravity.
Try to watch the following video in between runs of The Titanic.

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

No there are no examples of airliners crashing into buildings so none have fallen due to being hit by a plane.

Except for, you know, the whole 9/11 thing.

Or have you come around to bENT's no planes / mass hypnosis / special effects thinking?

But the WTC was built to withstand being hit by an airliner.

But the Titanic was built to be unsinkable.

No, there are no examples of buildings falling due to planes of any size crashing into them. Just as there are no examples of steel buildings collapsing in free fall due to fire.
Come on Ant, your turn to provide an example-
A steel building collapsing in free fall due to fire.

Here's an example of a building collapsing due to fire after a fuel laden 300,000lb airliner hit it.

I'm not sure what this "free fall" shit is, what do you expect it to do, stop on the way down for a quick smoke?

Now who's making bad jokes without a thought for all those who died?
You have no examples of any steel buildings apart from the WTC collapsing on themselves at the speed of gravity due to fire.
Don't you think this might mean something?

Yes, it means no other building of the size and construction was hit by a Boeing 767 you fucking idiot.

Is that too hard to understand?

Originally Posted by Crestofawave

Try to watch the following video in between runs of[I] The Titanic.

Another whackjob video that's probably been posted in this thread eight times by you and other fucking idiots.

I've never seen *anyone* try and compare a bit of Interstate with the WTC.

Just more invented bullshit.



Added: It cracks me up when dicks like you cling to these various bullshit stories and when they are rightly dismantled call the people that expose your fucking shite "debunkers"!

By the way, for those of you that don't know, the whackjobs tactic of continually posting a tirade of bullshit - ranging from invisible to non-existent planes, imaginary exploding buildings and on to some wanky shite claiming that people have tried imaginary arguments to support the actual truth - has a name:

The Gish gallop.

Although it could equally be called verbal diarrhoea.

Just to kill off the "Building 7 was blown up" wankers:The words of Deputy Chief Hayden, 33 years in Division 1.

Firehouse: Other people tell me that there were a lot of firefighters in the street who were visible, and they put out traffic cones to mark them off?


Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?


Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.

<snip>

Firehouse: Chief Nigro said they made a collapse zone and wanted everybody away from number 7— did you have to get all of those people out?


Hayden: Yeah, we had to pull everybody back. It was very difficult. We had to be very forceful in getting the guys out. They didn’t want to come out. There were guys going into areas that I wasn’t even really comfortable with, because of the possibility of secondary collapses. We didn’t know how stable any of this area was. We pulled everybody back probably by 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon. We said, this building is going to come down, get back. It came down about 5 o’clock or so, but we had everybody backed away by then. At that point in time, it seemed like a somewhat smaller event, but under any normal circumstances, that’s a major event, a 47-story building collapsing. It seemed like a firecracker after the other ones came down, but I mean that’s a big building, and when it came down, it was quite an event. But having gone through the other two, it didn’t seem so bad.

Deputy Chief Peter Hayden | Firehouse