9/11 arguments must be a team sport judging by the slapping of each others backs going on in this thread...by both sides I might add. LOL.
"The guys that agree wit me are smart and the ones that agree wit you r stoopid!"
9/11 arguments must be a team sport judging by the slapping of each others backs going on in this thread...by both sides I might add. LOL.
"The guys that agree wit me are smart and the ones that agree wit you r stoopid!"
If you actually tried this, this thread might have ended 211 pages ago.Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
And if the plane did hit the poles, what do you think the effects were on
a) the wings themselves
b) the trajectary and controllability after this point
You mean the Photoshopped plane without the nose? Are the poles, er columns, photoshopped too? Just asking.Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
Pretty sure this applies to continually posting the same repetitive, obsessive nonsense too.Originally Posted by beazalbob69
Here you go, Albert : educate yourself.
You have previously admitted that you do not view links posted by "us"...the opposition.
I suggest that you view THIS one. The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows
Not one of you can answer this?Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
^Can you supply me with a dxf file of the structural plan?
Are you for fvcking real? Sorry, rhetorical question, sadly you've proven time and again that you are. An engine that was subjected to the crushing force of 500MPH against a solid concrete reinforced wall and YOU expect it to to come out like it was just washed and polished and exactly the same size as a fancy new one? FFS that just takes a complete loss of all reality to even think about arguing such nonsensical perception.
Welcome to ENT's world, Florida. You'll be lucky to escape with your sanity.
Yo bitches, don't be dissing the tin foil gang, they be popping a cap in yo ass!
SAIC and the WTC After 9/11
It turns out that SAIC was one of the first organizations to show up at Ground Zero. The company claimed in its 2004 shareholder report that — “Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, we responded rapidly to assist a number of customers near ground zero in New York City and in Washington, D.C.”[20] In one of these instances, “SAIC technicians raced to Ground Zero within hours to install an ad hoc communications network for first responders and local financial companies.”[21] Therefore, SAIC was in control of at least some of the communications at Ground Zero.
Perhaps the most interesting SAIC connection to the cleanup was John Blitch, a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army’s Special Forces, who was said to have retired from the Army just the day before 9/11. It was reported that Blitch was “filling out the paperwork in an out-processing office of the Pentagon on the morning of September 10, 2001,” and that after “three years at the helm of the Defense Department’s Tactical Mobile Robots Program,” he was “leaving to direct the Center for Intelligent Robotics and Unmanned Systems at the Science Applications International Corporation.”[22]
Instead of traveling to his SAIC office in Colorado on 9/11, as he had planned, “Blitch scrapped the trip…and headed for New York. On the road, Blitch donned his fatigues, dug out his military ID, and worked his cell phone, summoning colleagues from Florida to Boston to pack up their finest tactical robots and rendezvous at Ground Zero.” And “Over the next 11 days, the group’s 17 robots squeezed into spaces too narrow for humans, dug through heaps of scalding rubble, and found seven bodies trapped beneath the mountains of twisted steel and shattered concrete.”[23]
Blitch was experienced at such search missions, and had done “ground-breaking research in robot assisted search and rescue conducted during the Oklahoma City Bombing response”.[24] By May 2001, laser technology was being used by Blitch’s robot program. It was reported that — “Robots are performing quite successfully in the field of explosive ordnance disposal (EOD)”… and “EOD units [include] a laser weapon for ordnance neutralization…[used to] burn unexploded ordnance.”[25]
Therefore, SAIC had the means and opportunity to neutralize any unwanted explosives that might have been buried in the pile at Ground Zero. That’s interesting in that SAIC supplied the largest contingent of non-governmental investigators to the NIST WTC investigation after 9/11. That investigation went to great lengths in order to avoid consideration of explosives.
Is a lamp post to difficult for you to comprehend?Originally Posted by Humbert
You've never studied logic, have you Albert.
"The best predictor of belief in a conspiracy theory is belief in other conspiracy theories"
"People hate randomness, they dread the sort of random occurrences that can destroy their lives, so as a mechanism against that dread, it turns out that it’s much easier to believe in a conspiracy"
"Conspiracy theories also seem to be more compelling to those with low self-worth, especially with regard to their sense of agency in the world at large. Conspiracy theories appear to be a way of reacting to uncertainty and powerlessness"
"... while believing George W. Bush helped plan the Sept. 11 attacks might make you feel in control, it doesn’t actually make you so"
Wow ! Ant smuggled a message out !
Thanks for your input...we'll mail you a cake with a file in it
Thank fuck this pile of shit is finally in the DH where it belongs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)