Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Stubblebine ahs been dragged up 3 times in the 9/11 threads....and thoroughly discredited each time. The man's a joke, and probably has Alzheimers, or at least dementia.
Anyone like "Pragmatic" who mentions him again is also a joke.

You're known as the bigest liar on TD, repeatedly caught lying about anything that doesn't conform to your dark and twisted little schizoid mind.

You've attempted to denigrate Alfred Stubblebine time and again, using one US Military Intelligence project that Stubblebine was directed to undertake as though it were some sort of invention of his, but was not.

This is just typical of you when your claims are legitimately refuted, you shoot the messenger, the last defence of a loser who has no verifiable backup to his claims.


Read more;
Albert Stubblebine

<li class="mod" style="clear:none">Albert "Bert" Newton Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the United States Army. He was the commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command from 1981 to 1984, when he retired from the Army. Wikipedia


Education: Columbia University, United States Military Academy

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by Gazza

Reports of 4 eye-witnesses that doesn't tally with the official story.

I have actually watched that complete clip.

The Cops said they viewed the plane approaching and one said he seen it actually hit the Pentagon. Also said he noted the AA logo's.

The light poles where downed from the other direction but who knows what caused that ?

Lets go with what the two cops had seen which was a plane approaching over the gas station.

ENT say's there was no Plane at all but it was a missile that hit the Pentagon.
was it a fuking plane or a missile that hit the Pentagon or an internal explosion. ???

Oh yes, the plane was a decoy and it fucked off over the top of the Pentagon whilst the missile downed the light poles from the other direction and hit the Pentagon at the exact moment.

That's right, the plane they saw flew OVER the Pentagon. There was no airliner

crash at the Pentagon.

Are you fuckers still going?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

You are the biggest JOKE on TD, mate....and a nasty little twisted jerk....your tirade at Terry was disgusting.

And Terry's 'tirade' aimed at other posters seems to be okay?

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by Latindancer

You are the biggest JOKE on TD, mate....and a nasty little twisted jerk....your tirade at Terry was disgusting.

And Terry's 'tirade' aimed at other posters seems to be okay?

Terry's ok with his dyed 1970 Burt Reynolds moustache , sorry Tel ,

Originally Posted by Latindancer

People often get facts like this quite wrong. People generally are not that observant about details....a fact well-known in court,

You're right, observations can change especially over time. But, I'm quite sure the witnesses knew on which side of the Citgo station they saw the plane flying.

Originally Posted by ENT

That's right, the plane they saw flew OVER the Pentagon. There was no airliner

crash at the Pentagon.

Hey Cunty,

The Cop said he seen the fuking plane actually hit the Pentagon and also said he noticed the AA logo's on it.

So according to you ENT the plane flew at ground level and at the last second banked up and over the Pentagon whilst some cont fired a missile at that precise second to hit the Pentagon.

That's exactly what you are suggesting ain't it ENT.

The cop was lying about seeing the plane hit the Pentagon and you're version is how it happened. ?

The cop was standing there watching the fuking thing whilst you where buggering you're goat you tool.

Fucking cock head ENT.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

You are the biggest JOKE on TD, mate....and a nasty little twisted jerk

Your tirade at Terry was disgusting.

I agree, ENT hurt my very delicate feelings.


I also agree that ENT is a nasty little twisted jerk and the biggest joke on this forum.

Originally Posted by Gazza

You're right, observations can change especially over time.

But, I'm quite sure the witnesses knew on which side of the Citgo station they saw the plane flying.

There's no argument regards which side the plane approached from. The cops ain't stupid and know what they saw.

The issue is how did the light poles end up on the ground considering they where in the other direction. ?

Fuked if I know but ENTS version that a fuking missile caused it is insanity.

Even the old guy with the Taxi said fuk all about a missile, he merely stated that he ended up with a pole thorough his window which we can see.

Further more, take the speed of the plane and the speed of a missile it would be impossible to coincide the two to hit the pentagon at exactly the same time.

Fuking Impossible.

Originally Posted by Gazza

You're right, observations can change especially over time. But, I'm quite sure the witnesses knew on which side of the Citgo station they saw the plane flying.

Further more regarding this.

The old boy seemed to indicate he was only a small man and did not want to get involved.

The interviewer took this statement as meaning he was with holding his story because of fear that he might be assassinated or something nasty might happen to him or his family.

The interviewer was surmising in other words but not dealing with fact.

So why would a Policeman holding an official position feel free to tell the world that he actually seen the plane fly into the Pentagon and a lowly old taxi driver feel threatened regards telling his story ?

Cop didn't give a fuk and told it how it was.

The old boy seem a tad confused and pressured by the Interviewer.

Oh yes, back to the missile hitting the Pentagon at exactly the same time the plane banked up and over it.

Fuk orf.

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Terry's 'tirade' aimed at other posters seems to be okay?

No, No, The only one I " tirade " on is ENT, this is because he is one fucked up Dude who spends all day trolling this forum regards 9/11 even though he really knows that the official line is spot on.

He is a bit of a sick fuk , Mad as a wheel. Also send's me very nasty " REDS ".

Cont ENT.

All you other conspirator dudes I play nice with.

Somchai's got 2 pics of you, tosser. I'll be in Bkk in the morning. B C ing ya.

I don't need to denigrate General Stubblebine....people have already done it FOR me !



Encyclopedia of American Loons: #378: Albert Stubblebine & Rima Laibow

the men who stare at goats | jonronson.com

Originally Posted by ENT

Somchai's got 2 pics of you, tosser. I'll be in Bkk in the morning. B C ing ya.

No probs ENT.

Bet ya my Somchai gets you before you're Somchai gets me.

I've had my guy checking you out ENT, contract is payed for, cash up front.

May be this is why there's no whistle blowers on 9/11?

^

There are no whistle blowers because there is nothing to blow the whistle about .

If there was any truth to the conspiracy theory it would be so easy for the perpetrators to join forces to out them self and tell there story to the world.

One person can be persecuted such as Assange has been but a group cannot.

They would have nothing to fear as a combined voice and would make a shit load of money selling there story.

Don't hold you're breath for that day, it will not come.

How would you explain the dramatic spike in put options for United and American airlines in the days before 9/11, Terry? The put / call ratio for United was 25 : 1. Looks like foreknowledge and conspiracy to me. Several million of the put options haven't been claimed.

Where does it say who bought those put options?

Pay attention, Rainfall. We've already gone into the foreknowledge. Thousands of pieces of data arrive every week into the offices of the NSA and FBI, and these particular bits weren't acted on quickly enough. Some people knew SOMETHING was going to happen and that it involved planes.
But the debate here on this forum got sidetracked by some idiots who insist that the actual mechanics of planes into buildings is suspect

Originally Posted by Latindancer

They would have been so overwhelmed by the whole occurrence they would not be sure if it was a direct hit or at an angle.

An angle? You mean the angle of 42 degrees in the official story? I think the 2 cops surely would've seen the plane, at some point, banking sharply to the right and then sharply to left to get onto the official story's flight path of 42 degrees (but highly unlikely within such a short distance.)

Both stated they saw a plane flying in a straight line and each marked a straight flight path on photos. I don't doubt their reports about that.

But then, to impact the Pentagon head-on leaving only one entry point, caused by the cone/fuselage, with no damage whatsoever done by 2 multi-ton engines, brings us back to square one again doesn't it? Small hole big plane.
But, with the added puzzle of how did the plane suddenly then veer 42 degrees after initial impact to cause all the internal damage?

Originally Posted by terry57

If there was any truth to the conspiracy theory it would be so easy for the perpetrators to join forces to out them self and tell there story to the world.

Would you? Tell the whole world you had a hand in the killing of 3000+ of your fellow Americans, not to mention how many have been killed worldwide resulting from your involvement?
"Oh look! They're the ones claiming who did it. They say they're sorry so that's ok then."

Wouldn't matter how much money you made from the story as you'd spend the rest of your life behind bars and/or in court rooms.

Sorry, forgot about the Patriot Act so scratch out 'court rooms'.

^

I do see you're point but people are strange because of our nature.

I refer back to the " Pearl Harbor Theory " . Conspirators say it was staged by the Government so the USA could enter the war..

Jesus, crazy arsed shit that EH.

If that was true surely some of the Old boys involved would decide to come clean when realizing they where going to die. Cancer and stuff like that.

A dying man has nothing to fear, hence I find that theory of not speaking out because of fear of persecution not viable.

9/11 was 12 years ago, not a word from anyone involved except eye witnessed like the cop in the clip.

He says he seen the plane hit the Pentagon by the way and he was looking straight at it.

Whata load of old cobblers!

Originally Posted by terry57

A dying man has nothing to fear

If that's the case then why did a top IRA man give an interview regarding IRA attrocities only after being promised the interview tapes wouldn't be released until after his death.