Quote Originally Posted by hazz View Post
Well you see shagnastier to have an understanding of what happened you actually have to have an interest in what actually happened rather than the innate gut understanding that you have confessed to following. for you no evidence will ever be good enough for you.... as in your heart you know what happened and thats all you need and will believe.

And thats the amusing thing.... to the truthers, they argue that the damaged caused the the planes flighing into a unarmored building like WTC is too extensive to be believable whilst at the same time the complain that the damage caused to a building designed to survive truck bombs is not enough to be believable. Classic Orwellian double think.

As to what happens to aluminum when it comes in contact with a hard, but not entirely unmovable object.

You can't have it both ways, hazz. The plane at the Pentagon atomized, while those touching down in the WTC left pools of sloshing fuel that burned for an hour or so. I read up that the Pentagon plane hit the only steel-reinforced area of the building, not specified is its size. One of the five faces? Odds 1 : 5. 20 metres wide? Odds 1 : 65.