Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

What does that image look like then smarty?

It's NIST's representative image used in an attempt to explain how the facade broke.

Explain how the break could have occurred in a straight line as shown there.

Originally Posted by ENT

Prove it.

Well ENT, right back at YA.


You cannot prove any of you're rambling, the onus is on you to provide the Truth not the officials to provide proof. They have it already.

Anyway, when I watched that Pearl Harbor bullshit it was exactly like reading you're posts.

Nothing tangible what-so ever and more of the conspiracy bullshit.

70 years down the track and no one from the Pearl harbor days has uttered a word.

Its all a pile of horse shit ENT. Get the fuk over it.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

You're on your own there Terry - every one else is shaking their heads in disgust at you lot.

No NO Albert,

The only ones doing that are you conspirator dudes, the vast majority of the World's population shake there heads in amazement that you guys can actually hold onto a redundant theory that is just so wrong in every regard.

12 years down the track and you guys are still hanging on for the smoking gun that never fired.

Now we have some fuk up claiming Pearl Harbor was a set up all those years ago.

You aren't seriously suggesting Pearl Harbor was a set up Are you ? ?

Once again, not a shred of evidence and more conspiracy theories front and centre.

Good for a laugh though.

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

Prove it.

Well ENT, right back at YA.


...the onus is on you to provide the Truth not the officials to provide proof. They have it already.

Well, let's see the proof they have.

Yer still full of hogwash and sick in the head Terry, ya brown nosing union shill.

Originally Posted by terry57

You cannot prove any of you're rambling, the onus is on you to provide the Truth not the officials to provide proof. They have it already. Anyway, when I watched that Pearl Harbor bullshit it was exactly like reading you're posts. Nothing tangible what-so ever and more of the conspiracy bullshit. 70 years down the track and no one from the Pearl harbor days has uttered a word. Its all a pile of horse shit ENT. Get the fuk over it.

Are you blind and deaf Terry?
Maybe try turning the sound up next time and asking Harry to move his head to the side.

Originally Posted by terry57

12 years down the track and you guys are still hanging on for the smoking gun that never fired.

Here's a few smoking guns.

1: WTC7 (Collapsed symmetrically at freefall speed for no reason)
2: Shanksville crash site (NO PLANE CRASHED)
3: Pentagon crash site (NO PLANE CRASHED)
3: 100's of eyewitnesses who heard the demolition charges and attest to no plane debris.
4: 1000's of proffessionals opinions that the official story is a sack of shit

I mean Terry - how many smoking guns do you want?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

and even if it is not, they do NOT look like they have been cut by charges. Where are the uneven surfaces and smoke damage ????

Jesus Christ ENT, have a look at the fucking picture. Of course that nice straight line has not been caused by charges.

Its when you posts insane stuff like this its when you spiral down the shitter of madness.

^ Go on shit-for-brains,...tell us what that pic's all about.

Originally Posted by ENT

Well, let's see the proof they have.

ENT, ya still don't get it do YA.

They do not need to provide proof, they have the proof. That being a shit load of dead people and broken buildings.

Its for you fukers to provide proof to dis claim the official story.

You can not and never will.

You have nothing except innuendo and silly theories. Nothing fuking rock solid in other words.

Regards the Movie,

I loved the bit where the Mouth Piece was saying the Government offed the buildings as an excuse to go to War.

He also said Pearl Harbor was arranged so The US could enter the War.

I mean Fuk me,

If you guys actually believe that shit you are more fuked up than I could ever imagine.

"Innocent till proven guilty"

Funny how Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheyney were pointing the finger at the patsys on the first day before the dust had settled - said they were Saudis - then invaded Iraq and Afghanistan.

Maybe they should have used your mighty concept.

Oh that's right, they were committing mass murder and theft via deception so obviously had no interest in proof whatsoever.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Here's a few smoking guns.

1: WTC7 (Collapsed symmetrically at freefall speed for no reason)
2: Shanksville crash site (NO PLANE CRASHED)
3: Pentagon crash site (NO PLANE CRASHED)
3: 100's of eyewitnesses who heard the demolition charges and attest to no plane debris.
4: 1000's of professionals opinions that the official story is a sack of shit

Here we go again Albert, rehashing stuff that's been sorted Years and years Ago.

Regards the downed planes that weren't downed according to ENT. So I imagine the planes and there human cargo are hiding out in the desert somewhere ?

I mean fuk me Albert, where the fuk are you're smoking guns exactly.

ENT reckons secret agents have offed all those passengers so they can't come clean with there story.

Got laugh at that shit EH.

^Ok Terry - you've asked for it - I'm going to do you a little picture post to explain

Hold tight.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

They were committing mass murder and theft via deception so obviously had no interest in proof whatsoever.

No they did not commit mass murder and deception Albert.

Only in the minds of the conspirators did they do that.

The vast majority of the worlds population have no problem in the Official line, its only the tiny minority that believe any different.

Its the same in real life, the small minority of complainers are just that, a small minority and everyone laughs at them Eh ENT.

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

Well, let's see the proof they have.

They do not need to provide proof, they have the proof. That being a shit load of dead people and broken buildings.

Its for you fukers to provide proof to dis claim the official story.

A fascist brown nosing union shill like you would of course say that.

Typical bully-boy stance. What makes you think that governments don't need to front up?


So, if they (or you) have what you call "the proof" (of whatever that is in your mind), why not show it?

That'd be normal practice in any situation.

But no, there's no proof forthcoming from the US gov.of what those aircraft were, not even a single ID number of even one aircraft part.

There isn't even a coherent scientific explanation of how the towers were able to collapse from burning around 5,000 gallons of kerosene in one mighty diffused fuel/air explosion then miraculously a series of small office fires.

How the foundations of those columns were able to explode and collapse from the effect of fires 800 and 900 ft above ground level has never been adequately explained.

Why don't you explain how it all happened, in your own words, if you can, Mr Terry-not-a-fireman.

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

They were committing mass murder and theft via deception so obviously had no interest in proof whatsoever.

No they did not commit mass murder and deception Albert.

Only in the minds of the conspirators did they do that.

The vast majority of the worlds population have no problem in the Official line, its only the tiny minority that believe any different.

Its the same in real life, the small minority of complainers are just that, a small minority and everyone laughs at them

Ya got that wrong, ya semi-educated oaf.

You think you're safe because you're a little maggot who brown noses psychopathic bullies and then rushes around bullying others, ya fascist union creep.

More than 54% of the world's population know that the official line on 9/11 is a gigantic hoax, a lie, and it's being perpetuated by the current POTUS, who only recently got caught out lying straight faced over NSA and PRISM and ECHELON spying on the world.

But you're a frightened little coward, a shill, who can't operate ANYWHERE without lying and playing the game of set up and put down.

Go have a prolapse.

Last example of a perfect cover-up was the art trove in Germany. Discovered 2011, and for two years the public was oblivious.

Originally Posted by ENT

What does that image look like then smarty?

It's NIST's representative image used in an attempt to explain how the facade broke.

If it is a representative image, then why are you commenting on it as if it is a photo of real damage ? And saying that it looks like charges cut the sections we can see in the image ? Which, even if it were a photo, is obviously untrue ? Turkey !

Smoking Gun 2

Now let's compare what happened with WTC 7 which had small fires on a few floors and a 44 story chinese building that was engulfed entirely with flames.

Look carefully now - see if you can spot a wee discrepancy in physics

1st up, A 44 story building in China 2009.



And this is what happened to WTC 7



Does fire work differently in China or something? Did I miss a meeting?

Shame on all the people who say Chinese goods are shit

Fire works differently in different buildings, constructed of different materials, and of different weight.

Shit I'm shattered, ENT Has Redded me again.



Jesus ENT, you must giving out a heap of greens to keep firing those reds at me EH.

Carry on, They'll come back.

Anyway ENT,

Where are all the dead people from those planes and further more where are the planes. ?????

Ya still keep dodging those questions ENT.

Paste up all that other shit but cant get it together to answer the very fundamentals of the story.

Its like passing go with a stalled engine.

So in you're first pictures Albert we see a massive gouge in the ground, so what made that if not a plane ?

Regards where is the plane ??? who knows. That picture could of been altered to show no plane.

The picture don't prove shit.

As far as you're two building comparison goes, big deal innit.

Different building, different circumstances and different fire loads.

The examples you guys throw up are meaningless as each building reacts differently in different circumstances and different construction methods.

Its like saying everyone on this forum is a total shit stain just because ENT is.

Ain't true is it .

Only some of them are but you're OK Albert, just a pity ENT has you under his warped spell.

Smoking gun 3

Here's the damage to the front of the Pentagon on 9/11



Where are the wings and ...

Where the fuck are these huge mothers?

We've posted pics of at least one of em. But you seem to be selectively blind !

Jesus christ,

I've just watched the clip which shows the high rise fires.

Funny thing is that none of them where impacted by a massive fuk off jet liner loaded with fuel and they all would of had there steel frame protected to guard against fire.

Twin Towers fire protection was fuked.

Not friggin hard is it.

Once again the conspiracy nutters clutch at a story that can be pissed away up against a wall.

On the report card is written,

" Must try harder "