Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

In fact, a lage number of those questioned after the fact about their alleged statements refute those allegations, and confirm that they are being quoted out of context or never even said what is attributed to them.

Give a reference for that.

We're all still waiting.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Also, bear in mind, he's not saying 500 or 118 firemen said it was a controlled demolition, or explosions even. He's hand-picked accounts that best corroborate his and ENT's delusions about explosions. If you actually read those statements IN CONTEXT of the quotes that were hand-picked and isolated from context, the vast majority simply say quotes like "it sounded like explosions as the floors were collapsing" and "the forces of the pancaking floors sounded like explosions" - and in no way imply or speculate on "controlled demolitions".

In fact, a large number of those questioned after the fact about their alleged statements refute those allegations, and confirm that they are being quoted out of context or never even said what is attributed to them.

Same old ENT-mode-of-operation, eh ?

• 1) Provides no evidence to support most of his assertions.
• 2) Repeatedly invokes a privileged body of evidence and ignores the vast body of public evidence.
• 3) Excludes possibilities out of hand, cherry-picking a few issues to address.
• 4) Relies on flat denials

And that's BEFORE all the childish insults and trolling.

Originally Posted by ENT

We're all still waiting.

We're still waiting for your account of what you think happened at the Pentagon. And we have been for 3 days now, oh hyperbolic hypocrite.
Keep him waiting, Cthulhu.

Originally Posted by ENT

We're all still waiting.

Where's your statement and account of the Pentagon incident, eh?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Same old Latindancer-mode-of-operation, eh ?

• 1) Provides no evidence to support most of his assertions.
• 2) Repeatedly invokes a privileged body of evidence and ignores the vast body of public evidence.
• 3) Excludes possibilities out of hand, cherry-picking a few issues to address.
• 4) Relies on flat denials

And that's BEFORE all the childish insults and trolling.

Corrected post.

Originally Posted by ENT

Goon Squad: Why did the 9/11 Commission Refuse to Listen to NYFD Firefighters Who Were at the WTC Scene?

Love those links you post, ENT - they are full of gems:

9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB pulled off by the WH; the FBI, the CIA and the Pentagon... and ISRAEL.

... ah, yes, Israel... Where's HansuMan when you really need him (waves to Prufie!)

"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running"

I thought there was no melting steel... or there was... or there wasn't....

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Same old Latindancer-mode-of-operation, eh ?

• 1) Provides no evidence to support most of his assertions.
• 2) Repeatedly invokes a privileged body of evidence and ignores the vast body of public evidence.
• 3) Excludes possibilities out of hand, cherry-picking a few issues to address.
• 4) Relies on flat denials

And that's BEFORE all the childish insults and trolling.

Corrected post.

Ah, the usual M.O. of "truthers" - falsifying evidence. Classic.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

In fact, a lage number of those questioned after the fact about their alleged statements refute those allegations, and confirm that they are being quoted out of context or never even said what is attributed to them.

Give a reference for that.

We're all still waiting.

I think LD's gone for a cry or a private hissy fit again,....he's learning.

Originally Posted by ENT

^^^Wrong again!
You've forgotten that you said that once before. Yer Aspie's a bit hard on ya, innit?

My credit's in the quintuple positive digits and increasing daily, thanks to idiots like you

Obviously, because you are being paid by the word ... by Cheney.

Your logic is non-existent.

I see you just got back from wrecking another thread, you twisted little creep.

I see you're being hypocritical again, you little turd.

Originally Posted by ENT

I see you just got back from wrecking another thread, you twisted little creep.

What's that ENT - you got forced into retirement? Oh, I mean "unexpected retirement".

Sounds kinda exactly what happened with your family. I detect a pattern.

Not really a surprise - were you starting to talk to too many of your colleagues about 9/11? Were you treating the skeptical ones as you do people in this thread?

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

Originally Posted by Koojo

It's pretty obvious, after examining ENTs evidence, that no planes were destroyed on 9/11.

Correct, and no buildings either - it was just mass hypnosis.

That Twicky David Copperfield....magicial extwaordinaiwwe

Originally Posted by Latindancer

That Twicky David Copperfield....magicial extwaordinaiwwe

Damn, that's it - you hit the nail right on the head!

It's all been a David Copperfield trick. He's in league with the government.

You two are just taking the piss now.

No way, we're dead serious!

That's the bit you ought to be worried about.