View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    13 68.42%
  • No

    5 26.32%
  • Not sure

    1 5.26%
Page 103 of 350 FirstFirst ... 353939596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111113153203 ... LastLast
Results 2,551 to 2,575 of 8746
  1. #2551
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    First off, do a quick google and you'll see that there have been plenty of flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder failures over the years.
    Bollix.

    Just tried Googling for results,....nope, not easy to find any failed CVRs or FDRs listed.

    In fact,.....u iz handin out buffalo chips.

  2. #2552
    I'm in Jail

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    14-12-2023 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,986
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post

    You are certifiable dude.
    Congrats, Tony. In the form of ENT, you have just interacted with your first mentally ill person on the internet. I'm serious here. ENT will lead you around in small circles, then large circles.

  3. #2553
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Did ya look at the video from the Pentagon that the FBI released?

    Did ya see hanging in the air, the three small clumps of smoke/debris from the small white smoke explosion on the lawn, the one before the main explosion at the Pentagon facade?

  4. #2554
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    So who're ya gonna believe?


    According to the federal authorities controlling Ground Zero, the black boxes from the two crashed 767s, Flight 11 and Flight 175, failed to turn up in the rubble taken from the site. The 9/11 Commission Report backs the FBI's story, flatly stating: "The CVRs and FDRs from American 11 and United 175 were not found."

    There are accounts contradicting the official account of the black boxes.

    Two men who worked in the cleanup operation at Ground Zero claim that they helped authorities find three of the four black boxes in October of 2001. One of the workers, New York City firefighter Nicholas DeMasi, has self-published a book with other Ground Zero workers in which he describes the recovery of the devices. The book, Behind the Scenes: GROUND ZERO, A Collection of Personal Accounts, can be ordered through SummerOfTruth.org.

    In December 2005, CounterPunch reported that an NTSB source contradicted the official account:

    "Off the record, we had the boxes," the source says. "You'd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here."


    Survivability Requirements

    Events that would damage the recorders sufficiently to make them unreadable are extremely rare.

    NTSB spokesperson Ted Lopatkiewicz said that he couldn't recall a domestic case before 9/11/01 in which the recorders were not recovered. The recorders are designed to survive the kinds of impacts that happened at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

    The FAA has placed durability requirements on the recorders and their casings to survive severe impact and fire

    The storage medium of each recorder is located in a protective capsule, which must be able to withstand an impact of 3,400 Gs (3,400 times the force of gravity).

    Additionally, each must also survive flames at 2,000 F for up to 30 minutes, and

    submersion in 20,000 feet of saltwater for 30 days.

    Typically, to increase their chances of survival, the recorders are located in the tail section of the aircraft, which usually sustains the least impact in a crash.
    9-11 Research: Black Boxes

  5. #2555
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    97,361
    Quote Originally Posted by Latindancer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post

    You are certifiable dude.
    Congrats, Tony. In the form of ENT, you have just interacted with your first mentally ill person on the internet. I'm serious here. ENT will lead you around in small circles, then large circles.
    There's only one person who needs meds more than ENT, and that's David44.


  6. #2556
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by Latindancer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post

    You are certifiable dude.
    Congrats, Tony. In the form of ENT, you have just interacted with your first mentally ill person on the internet. I'm serious here. ENT will lead you around in small circles, then large circles.
    True.

    When you're in the form of ENT, you end up interacting with the schizoid fishwife LD, the first seriously woopdedoo coocoo on TD.

    Let that be a warning to you.

  7. #2557
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,832
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Latindancer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Butterfly View Post
    that's rich coming from you after you got ass raped by everyone in the "valve" thread
    Nobody got ass raped in that thread.
    You did.

    First you claimed to,"....valve the windows up or down...", as your, "....car has electric windows...."

    .......then posted lies and a fake photo about a Chinese girl you and your "friend" had problems with.....


    Did you use 12th grade physics and "Popular Mechanics to sort that lot out?
    oh yeah, he is also a proven liar and living in a delusional world

    I forgot about the Chinese girl, he is either a troll or just a complete delusional schizo or both

  8. #2558
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Latindancer
    To drive nuts idiots like you ?
    what about "to manipulate idiots like you" ?

  9. #2559
    Thailand Expat
    DrAndy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    25-03-2014 @ 05:29 PM
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    32,025
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    So who're ya gonna believe?
    well, certainly not some nut valved out of his head on home grown drugs

  10. #2560
    Twitter #BKKTS
    Tom Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    27-08-2023 @ 10:33 AM
    Posts
    9,222
    The reality of 9/11 is so obvious - it deserves no further discussion. I've reconciled myself to that and have agreed with others there's little more to say. Pity the mental midgets (Mo, Curly and Larry) can't focus.

  11. #2561
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last Online
    14-09-2014 @ 04:20 PM
    Location
    Bangkok, the City of Angels!
    Posts
    3,071
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    So?

    No black boxes gave any information about AA Flt 77 that day. It wasn't flying.
    You're full of shit and you don't have a single shred of evidence to prove your silly conspiracy theory.

  12. #2562
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    97,361
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    So?

    No black boxes gave any information about AA Flt 77 that day. It wasn't flying.
    You're full of shit and you don't have a single shred of evidence to prove your silly conspiracy theory.
    Of course he does. Don't you know there are thousands of these retards out there with their own websites full of shit?


  13. #2563
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    So?

    No black boxes gave any information about AA Flt 77 that day. It wasn't flying.
    You're full of shit and you don't have a single shred of evidence to prove your silly conspiracy theory.
    Go cry to mama peckerwood, you know diddly squat.

    If you know of any black box info from AA Flt 77 let us know, tell the world and you can be a hero.

  14. #2564
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    So?

    No black boxes gave any information about AA Flt 77 that day. It wasn't flying.
    You're full of shit and you don't have a single shred of evidence to prove your silly conspiracy theory.
    Of course he does. Don't you know there are thousands of these retards out there with their own websites full of shit?
    The biggest retard on this thread has to be you harry, your in denial of what happened on 9/11, you even deny the seismic evidence showing NO AIRLINER CRASH happened at the Pentagon on 9/11?2001.

    Ya reckon ya work for some big shot oil company eh?
    They rely on geologists to get the oil to pay your wages, don't they, ya wee bean-counter?

    You're even in denial of the fact that geologists were the ones who said NO AIRLINER CRASH at the Pentagon 9/11/2001.

    Man, you're an utter fool!

  15. #2565
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last Online
    14-09-2014 @ 04:20 PM
    Location
    Bangkok, the City of Angels!
    Posts
    3,071
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post

    You're even in denial of the fact that geologists were the ones who said NO AIRLINER CRASH at the Pentagon 9/11/2001.
    ^ Please provide a link to a geologist who said that.

    If there's no seismic record of the explosion at the Pentagon on 9-11 does that mean it never happened?

    I guess you get all your disinformation from conspiracy sites and never bother checking for accuracy or engage in any critical thinking of your own.

    Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack
    http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/publicati...11pentagon.pdf

    Just because there's no clear seismic signal doesn't mean nothing happened. I have to wonder if you even know how a seismograph works? Are you aware that the WTC buildings were anchored in solid bedrock while the Pentagon is built on the alluvial plain of the Potomac River? Do you know how seismic waves propagate?

    I find your ignorance and naivete most amusing

    No evidence of an American Airlines Boeing 757 at the Pentagon? Gawd you are full of fail!


  16. #2566
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    97,361
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    So?

    No black boxes gave any information about AA Flt 77 that day. It wasn't flying.
    You're full of shit and you don't have a single shred of evidence to prove your silly conspiracy theory.
    Of course he does. Don't you know there are thousands of these retards out there with their own websites full of shit?
    The biggest retard on this thread has to be you harry, your in denial of what happened on 9/11, you even deny the seismic evidence showing NO AIRLINER CRASH happened at the Pentagon on 9/11?2001.

    Ya reckon ya work for some big shot oil company eh?
    They rely on geologists to get the oil to pay your wages, don't they, ya wee bean-counter?

    You're even in denial of the fact that geologists were the ones who said NO AIRLINER CRASH at the Pentagon 9/11/2001.

    Man, you're an utter fool!
    Sorry, all I can hear is

    "squeal, squeal, squeal".


  17. #2567
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    That's because you're in denial, chappy.

  18. #2568
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post

    You're even in denial of the fact that geologists were the ones who said NO AIRLINER CRASH at the Pentagon 9/11/2001.
    ^ Please provide a link to a geologist who said that.

    If there's no seismic record of the explosion at the Pentagon on 9-11 does that mean it never happened?

    I guess you get all your disinformation from conspiracy sites and never bother checking for accuracy or engage in any critical thinking of your own.

    Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack
    http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/publicati...11pentagon.pdf

    Just because there's no clear seismic signal doesn't mean nothing happened. I have to wonder if you even know how a seismograph works? Are you aware that the WTC buildings were anchored in solid bedrock while the Pentagon is built on the alluvial plain of the Potomac River? Do you know how seismic waves propagate?

    I find your ignorance and naivete most amusing

    No evidence of an American Airlines Boeing 757 at the Pentagon? Gawd you are full of fail!

    " Please provide a link to a geologist who said that." you ask.

    I already did, the seismologist who issued the report you refer to, and psst!!! I'll let ya into a secret, he was a geologist working at an observatory that the Pentagon asked to check on the times of the explosions, that the Pentagon got wrong!

    In your mind, if there's no evidence of a seismic event there must have been one, but nobody noticed?

    Don't you know that seismic waves of various types travel through various media in differing ways?

    The ones that travelled through the Potomac Plain only travelled a few miles to Palisades, and signals were picked up, but none commensurate to an airliner crashing into the ground nor into the Pentagon building.

    Signals were picked up that indicated the probability of electrical activity at the Pentagon immediately prior to and during the several explosions that did occur there at the time.

    "seismic records at the three nearest stations around the Pentagon with distance ranges from 63 to 208 km. Three minutes of vertical-component seismic records from 09:36:30 (EDT) to 09:39:30 (EDT) are plotted.

    There appears to be strong seismic signals around 09:38:52at station MVL (Millersville, Pa; = 139 km), but the signals are too high frequency (5-10 Hz) and too high amplitude (328 nm/s at 139 km). Hence, it appears be noise perhaps due to electrical disturbances. Otherwise, there are no clear and consistent seismic wave arrivals in this time window.
    ...the consistency of seismic phases across a seismograph network is the key to discern if there are any seismic signals generated during the plane impact into the Pentagon.

    These waveform data indicate that we could not identify seismic signals associated with the plane
    impact into the Pentagon on September 11.

    http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/publicati...11pentagon.pdf

  19. #2569
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last Online
    14-09-2014 @ 04:20 PM
    Location
    Bangkok, the City of Angels!
    Posts
    3,071
    ^ Do you really not realize that you are confirming your idiocy?

    Just because an event doesn't turn up on a seismograph does not mean it did not happen.

    Once again, you can't find a single example of a geologist who claims there was NOT and airline crash at the Pentagon on 9-11. All they've said is they didn't record a seismic event at the time of the crash. Then conspiracy nuts like you make a ridiculous claim that since there's no seismic record that it couldn't have happened.

    Clearly something hit the Pentagon, right? And whatever that was it contained hundreds of pieces of a Boeing 757 in American Airlines livery. But you say it wasn't AA77. Since you have all the answers (even if you don't have any facts) why don't you tell us what mysterious force or object could blow a hole through the Pentagon, leave hundreds of Boeing 757 parts in its wake, and not leave a seismic signal?

    C'mon genius, this should be good!

  20. #2570
    I'm in Jail

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    14-12-2023 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,986
    ENT,
    Your "logic" reminds me of a lady who was well-known as a madwoman in a suburb near me.
    She used to ramble on about ordinary things which other people use to talk about, lulling you into a kind of daze. But after a while you found her talking about completely DIFFERENT things.
    If you then closely followed what she was saying, you realized that she tied subjects together relatively seamlessly, but made occasional quantum leaps and unless you were concentrating closely, you didn't always notice.

    Correct, Tony. The main point is that there was a seismic signal, but it could not be actually CONFIRMED that it came from a plane crash. (Probably, as you said, because of the soil type).
    Last edited by Latindancer; 05-10-2013 at 01:30 PM.

  21. #2571
    I'm in Jail

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    14-12-2023 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,986
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post

    Sorry, all I can hear is

    "squeal, squeal, squeal".




  22. #2572
    I am in Jail
    leemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    07-10-2015 @ 02:27 PM
    Location
    pty
    Posts
    2,607
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    ^ Do you really not realize that you are confirming your idiocy?

    Just because an event doesn't turn up on a seismograph does not mean it did not happen.

    Once again, you can't find a single example of a geologist who claims there was NOT and airline crash at the Pentagon on 9-11. All they've said is they didn't record a seismic event at the time of the crash. Then conspiracy nuts like you make a ridiculous claim that since there's no seismic record that it couldn't have happened.

    Clearly something hit the Pentagon, right? And whatever that was it contained hundreds of pieces of a Boeing 757 in American Airlines livery. But you say it wasn't AA77. Since you have all the answers (even if you don't have any facts) why don't you tell us what mysterious force or object could blow a hole through the Pentagon, leave hundreds of Boeing 757 parts in its wake, and not leave a seismic signal?

    C'mon genius, this should be good!
    Go on, I'll bite...a Boeing 757?

  23. #2573
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last Online
    05-10-2013 @ 02:25 PM
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by benbaaa View Post
    You only have to see the look on Bush's face as he's told the news to know that at least he wasn't in on the conspiracy. If ever a face said WTF more eloquently, I'd like to see it.
    Haha...doesn't he have the same expression regardless of what's going on! Dumber than a sack of hammers...

  24. #2574
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyBKK View Post
    ^ Do you really not realize that you are confirming your idiocy?

    Just because an event doesn't turn up on a seismograph does not mean it did not happen.

    Once again, you can't find a single example of a geologist who claims there was NOT and airline crash at the Pentagon on 9-11. All they've said is they didn't record a seismic event at the time of the crash. Then conspiracy nuts like you make a ridiculous claim that since there's no seismic record that it couldn't have happened.

    Clearly something hit the Pentagon, right? And whatever that was it contained hundreds of pieces of a Boeing 757 in American Airlines livery. But you say it wasn't AA77. Since you have all the answers (even if you don't have any facts) why don't you tell us what mysterious force or object could blow a hole through the Pentagon, leave hundreds of Boeing 757 parts in its wake, and not leave a seismic signal?

    C'mon genius, this should be good!
    Hey smart a*se, why don't you try and prove there was an airliner crash at the Pentagon.

    Other than a few stooges who got their facts wrong, NOBODY sawan airliner fly into the Pentagon.

    They didn't actually see a damn plane fly into the building, just some crummy before and after calls, like "I saw/heard something that sounded?looked like a plane/airliner/jet/missile with wings..." or some such statement followqed by "then there was a boom/explosion/loud noise. smoke..." etc.

    Nothing substantial, just suppositions that a plane flew into the Pentagon.

    But oh, hang on a minute, AA Flt 77 didn't fly that day....

    I give you your own reference to a geologist (obvious you haven't a clue about the subject) who was the seismologist who wrote the report you refer to, and woopdedoo, nope, he ain't a real geologist, sez you, peckerwood.


    This bit you write makes me laugh;
    "Clearly something hit the Pentagon, right? And whatever that was it contained hundreds of pieces of a Boeing 757 in American Airlines livery. But you say it wasn't AA77. Since you have all the answers (even if you don't have any facts) why don't you tell us what mysterious force or object could blow a hole through the Pentagon, leave hundreds of Boeing 757 parts in its wake, and not leave a seismic signal?"

    Where did you get the idea that " hundreds of Boeing 757 parts" were found at the Pentagon?

    You, of all people have the magical ability to ID all those parts, trace them back to a Boeing 757, AA Flt 77, and NO ONE ELSE CAN!

    WOW!

    Sorry chappy, your imagination is running riot on ya, hooking disconnected pieces of information together to try and prove that a bloody great big Boeing 757 smacked into the Pentagon leaving minimal damage and insufficient plane debris to fill a garbage truck!

    No proof, no plane.

    You don't get a medal.

  25. #2575
    I'm in Jail

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    14-12-2023 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,986
    Massive hyperbole. We posted first-hand accounts of people, some of whom actually saw it hit.

    It's amusing to see you blithely discredit them by calling them stooges.

Page 103 of 350 FirstFirst ... 353939596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111113153203 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •