Thread: Explosion In Centre Of Norwegian Capital

Originally Posted by AjarnJonesy

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Same Guy Seen At Both Places. One arrest made so far.
“It’s a White Guy” says Government “And he’s Norwegian!”
Nothing to see here, move along ...

You know at what point do we actually start killing these worthless "infidels"? I think its time for the government to stand aside and let the military do what they are trained to do.. Seems strange... Here Europe traded the lives of 6 million Jews in WWII just gain 20 million Muslims..

We are at least getting at the ones that are capable of killing millions. Saddam Hussain, Gadafi, Taliban, maybe Iran in the future.

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by lom

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Chances that this is an fanatical islamic terrorist attack are quite big, but nothing certain as yet.

It is certain for logically thinking people.

It is obvious that you don't belong to that group.

Even if you are right, you are still a muslim apologist fuckwit. Listen to yourself !

You are just jumping for joy that the shooter guy might not be a muslim. What the fuck is wrong with you people ? I just don't understand why random socialist atheist people have an urge to defend muslims.

Are you going to hold a victory party if the shooter turns out not to be a muslim ?

Fuck off Socal you tosspot

Bless the Murdoch empire for once again proving how little use they are.

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Good to see solid, investigative journalism still at work at Wapping.

Apparently posting the first report that the assailant had a blond nordic look made me into an muslim appologist in Socal's mind, not only that but he posted it made him sick - so just to make sure

Blond Nordic, Blond Nordic, Blond Nordic, Blond Nordic, Blond Nordic, Blond Nordic. etc. etc.

It had a muslim apologist ring to it. After I read it a second time, i guess it was more non partisan then I thought. Not sure if Gibbs is sending you an invite to the muslim apologist victory party.

Your quote-"Maybe we are to quick with the Islamic angle just that it seems the most likely when shit like this goes down."

Next we have Mr. Gripps who don't think deliberate bombing innocent civilians 1000 of miles from the actual war-zone and executing children in a summer-camp is a fanatical act, he compares UN sanktioned millitary action by soldiers in Uniform with such disgusting cowardly lunatic acts of terrorism

Wonder what excuses Mr. Gripps have dreamed up now to refute the Blond Nordic (Norwegian) fanatical right wing loon, is fanatical???

Not knowing the above mentioned difference makes you a prime candidate for psychological help Mr. Gripps

Man this forum gets the weirdos coming out of the TD woodwork alright

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Bless the Murdoch empire for once again proving how little use they are.

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Good to see solid, investigative journalism still at work at Wapping.

They sure know how to twist the minds of the Brits. WMD in Iraq comes to mind.
I don't think it was a muzzie attack.
The part with the youth camp has the signature of a brained washes Socalist

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by lom

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Chances that this is an fanatical islamic terrorist attack are quite big, but nothing certain as yet.

It is certain for logically thinking people.

It is obvious that you don't belong to that group.

Even if you are right, you are still a muslim apologist fuckwit. Listen to yourself !

You are just jumping for joy that the shooter guy might not be a muslim. What the fuck is wrong with you people ? I just don't understand why random socialist atheist people have an urge to defend muslims.

Are you going to hold a victory party if the shooter turns out not to be a muslim ?

I haven't seen anyone "jumping for joy" that some lunatic has killed (currently) 87 people (and rising).

In fact, all I see is you seem bitterly disappointed that it isn't a muslim terrorist attack.

You're a bit of a twat, aren't you?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Hold the bus there Harry, we don't know for certain yet this piece of white-bread hasn't been in colusion with them pesky Al Quida's or not, eh?

Originally Posted by Norton

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Sounds like something's really fucked-up with Norway's society, man:

Yep. A ridiculous statement but of no relevance to the OP.

The guy is a hard core neo Nazi. A long standing reality in Norway.

If one were to look at the last 2000 or so years of history, the region produced the Vikings, who spread the doctrine of intolerance, brutality and force throughout Europe.

British soccer louts and US southern rednecks of Irish lineage are a good example of this heritage of violence.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Hold the bus there Harry, we don't know for certain yet this piece of white-bread hasn't been in colusion with them pesky Al Quida's or not, eh?

There are bits of relevant information filtering out:

Like most people, the moment the Norwegian mass killer was named as Anders Behring Breivik, the first thing i did was look him up on facebook.
A Director of Breivik Geofarm with qualifications in micro and macro finance and holding Conservative political views, he lists political analysis as one of his interests and his favourite books are 1984, On Liberty and The Trial. He also lists hunting as a pastime.
The reports are that the attacks were politically motivated and judging by his facebook profile, he does seem a political person.
Anders also had a twitter page here with just one tweet on the 17 July stating ‘One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only interests.’
The Facebook and Twitter account were only recently set up which could mean that in a piece of grim pre-planning, he created his social media pages knowing that these would be scoured when he perfomed the atrocities and his name became known.

There is speculation that he founded an agricultural company to get round Norway's restrictions on the purchase of fertiliser, and the above seems to support that.

Of course I'll agree that the full story is yet to come out, but as a newspaper you should be a little more responsible than to make the blanket statement "Al Qaeda Massacre" on your front page.

But, as we know from the Phone Hacking thread and things like Hillsborough and Colonel 'H' Jones, the Murdoch empire have never let little things like facts get in the way of a "good story".

Originally Posted by KAPPA

Originally Posted by Norton

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Sounds like something's really fucked-up with Norway's society, man:

Yep. A ridiculous statement but of no relevance to the OP.

The guy is a hard core neo Nazi. A long standing reality in Norway.

If one were to look at the last 2000 or so years of history, the region produced the Vikings, who spread the doctrine of intolerance, brutality and force throughout Europe.

British soccer louts and US southern rednecks of Irish lineage are a good example of this heritage of violence.

They where always the first in line when it came to signing up for a war. If there was OIL involved- Statoil.
Just like the Netherlands-Shell and the Brits-BP

^^^Is there some sort of ridiculous statement contest going on here today? The Vikings had a "doctrine"?

Originally Posted by robuzo

^^^Is there some sort of ridiculous statement contest going on here today? The Vikings had a "doctrine"?

Of course they had a doctrine. Rape, loot & pillage and they were the best at it in those days...

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Bless the Murdoch empire for once again proving how little use they are.

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Good to see solid, investigative journalism still at work at Wapping.

Iom, Harrybarr, Mr Gibbs, Tom Sawyer, where are you holding the muslim apologist victory party ?

Originally Posted by socal

. Saddam Hussain, Gadafi, Taliban, maybe Iran in the future.

Since Hussein never did have WMD other than some stale old mustard gas Rumsfeld gave him from Reagan to wage war on Iran, while he was training Bin Laden to fight Russians- I would have to exclude him from the list.

Seems US / UK oil / war machinery are way way ahead in the murdering civilians department. Must be hundreds of thousands at this point compared to AQ's measly, what 3- maybe 5000 from 9-11 onward?

Are we finally now now counting Pakistan as AQ sympathetic , too?

^^

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Bless the Murdoch empire for once again proving how little use they are.

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Good to see solid, investigative journalism still at work at Wapping.

They sure know how to twist the minds of the Brits. WMD in Iraq comes to mind.
I don't think it was a muzzie attack.
The part with the youth camp has the signature of a brained washes Socalist

Even Saddam Hussain thought he had WMD's. He could still be alive today if he cooperated with the UN weapons inspectors.

^ BS even the UN said he's clean And he was and they found nothing, then , either . Some old aluminum tubes missing critical elements for refining uraniuam was all Feith's " reports " based all that B U L L S H I T on.
War profiteers should be indicted.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by lom

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Chances that this is an fanatical islamic terrorist attack are quite big, but nothing certain as yet.

It is certain for logically thinking people.

It is obvious that you don't belong to that group.

Even if you are right, you are still a muslim apologist fuckwit. Listen to yourself !

You are just jumping for joy that the shooter guy might not be a muslim. What the fuck is wrong with you people ? I just don't understand why random socialist atheist people have an urge to defend muslims.

Are you going to hold a victory party if the shooter turns out not to be a muslim ?

I haven't seen anyone "jumping for joy" that some lunatic has killed (currently) 87 people (and rising).

In fact, all I see is you seem bitterly disappointed that it isn't a muslim terrorist attack.

You're a bit of a twat, aren't you?

If you where a betting man, even a muslim apologist like yourself would have put money on it being a muslim attack when the news broke.

It only takes some basic logic. Considering the attack in the Russian airport, the attack in India, the assassination of bin laden, Norwegian involement in Libiya and on and on..

Originally Posted by KAPPA

^ BS even the UN said he's clean And he was and they found nothing, then , either . Some old aluminum tubes missing critical elements for refining uraniuam was all Feith's " reports " based all that B U L L S H I T on.
War profiteers should be indicted.

True enough, but this has fuck all to do with the massacre in Norway. Tell us more about the relevance of the Vikings and their "doctrine."

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by socal

Originally Posted by lom

Originally Posted by socal

It is certain for logically thinking people.

It is obvious that you don't belong to that group.

Even if you are right, you are still a muslim apologist fuckwit. Listen to yourself !

You are just jumping for joy that the shooter guy might not be a muslim. What the fuck is wrong with you people ? I just don't understand why random socialist atheist people have an urge to defend muslims.

Are you going to hold a victory party if the shooter turns out not to be a muslim ?

I haven't seen anyone "jumping for joy" that some lunatic has killed (currently) 87 people (and rising).

In fact, all I see is you seem bitterly disappointed that it isn't a muslim terrorist attack.

You're a bit of a twat, aren't you?

If you where a betting man, even a muslim apologist like yourself would have put money on it being a muslim attack when the news broke.

It only takes some basic logic. Considering the attack in the Russian airport, the attack in India, the assassination of bin laden, Norwegian involement in Libiya and on and on..

Actually, when I heard it was just an explosion, my first thought was a gas leak.

The shooting was initially reported as a minor incident.

When it came out that the assaillant was dressed as a policeman, I starting swinging the way of a Hungerford-style massacre.

It's only now it's starting to look like the work of a politically motivated looney.

No-one is going to run around carrying out attacks on behalf of Libya, least of all the extremists, they want Gaddafi to fall.

Now if you'd had the brain cells to mention Afghanistan, you might at least have made some sense.

Perhaps a bit of reading up on current conflicts and the parties involved might actually educate you.

Actually Socal,
In the west i's white men who do most of the mass gun murdering. So by your logic we should round up all the white men and deport them?

Soc, may I say your policy endorsements are militant feminist at heart ? Interesting.

Originally Posted by Mid

Originally Posted by Aussie Tigger

It is time that anyone not born in a country can not obtain permanent status.Our Western countries are weak in this regard in providing full rights to foreigners after a period of time ie 2-5 years.

Temporary status only should be provided and be strictly enforced.I asked myself a question if even after living in my new country would I forsake my origins of being an Australian.

The answer is easy from most in that even though we have been adopted the origin or blood ties are permanent.

Unfortunately this affects those who are principled but the radicals are the cause of concern and everyone else gets affected in the process.

Multi racialism does not work,all we let form are pockets of different races who tolerate each others differences most of the time.

and yet

Originally Posted by Aussie Tigger

I always thought as hard as it may seem that those more fortunate had a moral obligation to help others.We can not change the world but we can influence the tiny pockets we live in.

Treating those around you with respect rubs off eventually if you take the time to explain why.

My wonderful Thai wife and I never stop learning from each others cultures and then endeavouring to influence our 13 year olf daughter to enhance her future.

The old saying what you put into the pot you get out is generally applicable even in Thailand.

Mid i can see how you may perceive my posts as being contradictory.My personal situation though differs in that I am able to have some influence on those around me.
Even though I reside the majority of the time in Thailand I can not say that i make a genuine effort to assimilate in that I dont learn the language and my closest friends are other farangs.
That is not to say I ignore Thais as I make a real effort to be friendly and respectful.
Observing other non Aussies in my own country it is rare to see them being embraced or embracing others unless they are from the same ethnic group.
My point is that because of the radicals who have created the need for security that was never required before it is my belief that any foreigner from another country should not be easily afforded the same rights as those born in the country. Hope this clarifies my previous posts.

Page 5 and it's becoming pretty clear that this event was staged by a tall blond native Norwegian Nazi, who was extremely anti socialist but had links to extremist muslim AQ cells. His actions seem to have been the result of his Viking roots, being as those fucking Vikings are responsible for spawning everything from Brisish soccer hooligans to American red-necks of Irish descent.

On hehalf of the Mudroch's please accept apologies for the Sun headlines. We are very very sorry about this. People we trusted have let us down again, and we have already implemented measures to ensure that it will never happen again....and from Rupert...."what....what are you talking about? I know nothing....massacre you say? "

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The front page of the Sun's first edition has banned "Al Qaeda Massacre".

Hold the bus there Harry, we don't know for certain yet this piece of white-bread hasn't been in colusion with them pesky Al Quida's or not, eh?

They are never far away..

Timothy McVeigh's Middle Eastern cohorts have been solidly identified in dozens of sworn witness statements' firsthand accounts which are corroborated by a methodically assembled investigative dossier. The most incriminating testimony centers around former Iraqi soldier, Hussain Al-Hussaini, whom witnesses place in the company of bomber Timothy McVeigh prior to the blast, seated in the passenger seat of the Ryder truck the morning of April 19, exiting that truck at ground zero, and speeding away from the bomb site in the only getaway vehicle targeted by the FBI in an all-points-bulletin for Middle Eastern suspects. Al-Hussaini has been unable to establish his whereabouts for the critical hours of that fateful morning, and more glaringly, the Justice Department has declined to officially exonerate him of suspicion.