Thread: Judge approves Assange extradition

Originally Posted by Necron99

Originally Posted by Butterfly

the reactions of the UK government scums is quite telling, I think we can bet with certainty that there is a secret plan by the US to extradite Assange from Sweden.

Why would the UK government go all over this trouble for a simple extradition request over an "alleged" crime ? and without a judgment ? unless of course they were trying to help their American "cause". Quite distasteful and another sign of British cowardice.

There was a reason DeGaulles didn't want those fucks in the EU, they always have been a security liability and backstabbing bitches for the Americans.

Indeed, how many people are extradited when they are only wanted for questioning in an alleged offense that wouldn't be an offense in the extraditing country?

"Yes indeed" Why on earth would Britain follow the law, what an odd quaint notion, after all butterfly is from south of the German border where things start to float and corruption and Government conspiracies mostly center about VIP's and Politicians abusing their powers, raping women and stealing from the coffers.

So no wonder, despite British published Supreme court deliberations on Assanges extradition where all is explained down to the minute detail, that a culturally handicapped like Butterfly choses to ignore the published facts and go by fantasy alone.

All this going back and forth about semantics is just the continued tactics of the Assange supporters obfuscating and twisting the known reality.

Assange fled Sweden on the day the Swedes had asked for him to meet up for a new interview, this time-line is agreed to by Assanges lawyers in the British Supreme court.

Fleeing from Justice is a crime, hence a Swedish and international arrest-warrant was issued, because of the arrest-warrant Assange was initially arrested in Britain and then let out on bail, Assange breached his bail conditions, which is a crime, and subsequently a British arrest-warrant was issued.

We don't need a Judgment other than the Arrest-warrants issued by courts based on the fact than Assange fled/and is refusing to show, claiming we do is pure inane semantics.
The Arrestwarrants are in effect the Judgment and punishments for said crime, that Assange is fleeing and refusing to show is undisputed! and the Judges not seeing Assange in their courtrooms think so too unsuprisingly.

The rest of us also know the facts about Assanges whereabouts the last couple of years, it has been broadcast in media on tv, and Assange personally has certainly not made a secret of him evading going to Sweden and now hiding in a embassy.

Finally - if we have to, Assange is a convicted criminal, in 1995 he pleaded guilty to 25 cases of hacking, during the investigation around 1993 he assisted the police in getting some paedos, so they cut a deal dropped 6 of the hacking charges and eventually let Assange get of lightly, in the sentence the Judge said - "Assange would have gone to jail for up to 10 years if he had not had such a disrupted childhood."
Julian Assange - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And cut the crap about it being an extradition from Sweden to the US Assange fears, I challenge anyone here to unequivocally prove the negative difference - to Assange being in Britain, other than even more complicated for the US since from Sweden it will take two EU nations to accept a US extradition request.

Assange has to answer for his private actions in Sweden, as far as the Swedish authorities goes - it has nothing to do with the US or Wikileaks no matter what - lies, distortions, character assassinations of the Swedish accusers, and far fetched unproven conspiracy fantasies some nutter bloggers write.

If anything is rotten in Sweden - US involved honey trap etc., trust the Swedish Courts, Assanges dream team lawyers, and the worldwide intense scrutiny of the handling of the case and it's evidence - to weed it out, if he is innocent he will walk, and if dirty tricks have been involved in trying to frame Assange there will be hell to pay.

Assanges lawyers, nutter websites and bloggers all agree this Rape/sexual assult case is a walk in the park, and since we know that being in Sweden or Britain makes no difference to a possible extradition to a US who still have sent no such request, it is incomprehensible why Assange just don't go there and clear up this mess, yes??