Thread: Judge approves Assange extradition

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Oh's post info in 383 makes the wrong conclusions it is another untrue spin on the present facts.

Of course, Amnesty Int'l wrong, Lardichr right.

Originally Posted by larvidchr

Lets try not to forget there still is no US extradition request.

Of course not, they aren't completely stupid to advertise what they will do once he is in Sweden.

I have not made any assumptions About Amnesty and their complaint Willy or maybe you can show me where? You are the one making that rubbish claim, it is just an unrelated old case from 2001.

Amnestys case is about two Asylum seekers and alleged terrorists from Egypt who was extradited back to Egypt in December 2001 just in the hysteric aftermath of 9/11.

It has absolutely nothing to with Assange and no bearing on his case, the rules applying to Assange is the EU arrest warrant treaty from 2004 and the extradition treaty with the US from 23/10-2009

As regards to what the US will do, -You are guessing Willy based on what??, the US have had over 2 years since Manning was arrested in may 2010, and I don't believe that the biggest superpower in the world with all it's human, technical and monetary resources, and as important a target Assange is by some claims, that the US would be so incredibly slow just formulating a charge the likely-hood that they do not have a case yet is as good or even a better guess than yours.

Fact there is no extradition request from the US and even if they have one later while Assange is in Sweden, Britain will still be the deciding country Willy!.