^
Yes. not very hard is it but Willy just cant help turning it into some major melodrama.![]()
^
Yes. not very hard is it but Willy just cant help turning it into some major melodrama.![]()
Not a melodrama terry, I was agreeing with you, to a degree.
1. I suspect we are not getting the whole story.
2. He probably should know better and keep his mouth shut
3. Upset feelings do not excuse the villagers smashing his house.
You raise a good point. In NYC everyone would probably ignore you, maybe they'd shout some insults as they were rushing by.
But do it at one of the Tea parties out in the middle of nowhere and see how civilized the average Amerikans really are. I bet you'd find out quickly.
I'd like to hear the German's side of the story though, I am sure there is a bit more to it.
Exactly, one of the problems that I see in indo is that the poor have a very strong sense of entitlement, mob rules often take matters in their own hands, motorcycles drive manicly and expect cars they hit to pay, religious groups try to shut down opposing churches etc.
I'd take what I hear from an Indonesian with a grain salt, these people are known for being liars. My shitbag government has been settling a bunch of these bastards in my city lately, they all lie about how bad they got it in Indonesia, and claim asylum. It makes my blood boil to know much these lying bastards get away with. They come here and want everyone to appease them, but they want their country to remain pure and monolithic, and if anyone gets out of line they treat them like the German guy in this article.
I am convinced that it is merely a matter of time until Muslims force the sane residents of civilized countries to nuke them off the face of the earth. Not since Japan in the forties has a group of people so deserved mass destruction.
Not according to the several expats I know living in Indon & Malaysia.Originally Posted by Wallalai
Bottom line is, if you come and live in another culture, have the common sense to 'fit in'. Barging in and yelling at a Village Headman is dumb, in any Asian village society. Barging in and unplugging a mike or amplifier during a Muzzie session is real dumb. Not excusing the villagers reaction, but in both cases these blokes- living there of their own volition- were stoopid, they should have known better.
Originally Posted by Jools
Sane residents of civilised countries realise that nuking 1.6 billion people off the face of the earth is not an option.Originally Posted by Jools
A few thoughts...it doesn't matter that the villagers are assholes or that they took something he said or did the wrong way, or even that he did nothing at all offensive but somebody decided to give him a hard time for no reason at all. Fact is, the guy has no standing in a Sharia court so if it reaches court the word of a Muslim is enough to pronounce him guilty even if he could prove his innocence with documents and video and a dozen non-Muslim witnesses.
Having rejected Allah, Allah's court will not afford him the protection of Allah's laws.
In other words, non-Muslims are guilty in the eyes of Islam for having rejected Allah. There is no greater sin than this, so whatever a non-Muslim is actually charged with becomes irrelevant next to the great sin. Get your head around this concept and it will lead to a better understanding in other areas.
If the guy is Jewish or Christian and has been living in Indonesia full time rather than as a tourist or visitor or by gov invite, then he is a dhimmi (google, or check out the dictionary of Islam in koran/allah thread). If he is not Jewish or Christian, then he is a fool that has always been in danger even if he didn't know it.
As an Islamic nation Indo is governed by Sharia, so don't listen to those with an agenda to have you believe otherwise. Although Indo is regarded as a democratic Islamic country insofar as they have secular elections, this is outranked by the laws of Allah (Sharia). There is no difference between Indo's Sharia and the Sharia as practiced in more looney Islamic nations like Saudi or Pakistan. Just as it is the same Islam it is also the same Sharia, even though it is not enforced as harshly, since Indonesia has until recently managed to find a balance of sorts between secularism and Sharia. But that is changing and will change faster as momentum grows, just like in other so called moderate Islamic nations like Turkey. Time is an element that works in favour of Islam across the board.
May be wrong but from the available info it looks like this guy has been living there a while, as a dhimmi, so as long as he was not practicing his religion and kept his nose clean he would be left in peace, and even so only until someone decides to score points with the community or Allah by targeting him for therapy.
Once he messes up or is targeted, as in this case, his main options are to convert to Islam or leave if he can and pronto. Otoh, as a practicing Jew/Christian that fell foul of the mob, those main options likely become his only options.
If it reaches the Sharia court, which means his option to leave is removed, the only way he could be found not guilty is if he converts to Islam. Once he does that he is elevated to the status of a Muslim, so his word is accepted as equal to that of any other Muslim. Also in all likelihood the charges would be dropped and he would be accepted by his community as one of them, and the bonus of course is that as a Muslim his word becomes superior to that of his non-Muslim community and friends.
This is not fiction, it is real life being played out.
Last edited by keda; 22-09-2010 at 10:16 AM. Reason: typo - greater
Lombok does not have Sharia law.Originally Posted by keda
Indo is NOT an Islamic nation.Originally Posted by keda
Yep, you are.Originally Posted by keda
Very well done and you are right that the Koran says nothing about microphones. If you ever need more ammo, the Koran also says nothing about Harry Potter, Coca Cola, the Dalai Lama, Pokemon, Disney's Aladdin, Mozart, chess, or Nike.
But the Koran has quite a bit to say about offence to Allah.
See if you can reconcile the two.
More than 50 regencies in 16 of Indo's provinces have passed laws influenced by sharia. Sharia advocates claim its divine origin and resist constitutional challenges based on grounds that Sharia is authorised directly by God; this makes political opposition to Sharia either apostasy or blasphemy. This is also the slide to conservative Islam that will turn Indo into another failed Muslim-majority state. The momentum is there, and time works quietly in favour of 'pure' Islam.
Otoh if it is true as you say that Lombok is entirely secular and the German ends up in a secular court then his chances are better, unless of course the main charge is upped to blasphemy, which would be trivial in a secular court if indeed it has jurisdiction...but it would be taken a wee bit more seriously in a Sharia court with full jurisdiction.
With something like a 90% Muslim majority Indo is...not only Southeast Asia's most populous country, but is also home to the world's largest Muslim population. And that population looks to be growing increasingly devout. Significantly more women wear the headscarf today than a decade ago, and the number of Indonesians making the pilgrimage to Mecca grows year after year. Alcoholic beverages are disappearing from the shelves of supermarkets, and in some places those who violate the Islamic ban on alcohol already face public whipping -- a brutal spectacle that is even broadcast on local television stations.
Sliding Towards Conservative Islam: Indonesia's Secular State under Siege - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International
Simple rule: Always observe and respect the law. Only a dumbarse would make such moves in a Muslim country.
Typical Kraut...certainly not know for their tact and diplomacy!Originally Posted by Fondles
I agree with you to a point, yes people would most certainly be offended at being acccused of a crime if they didn't commit it, but as Mr Fred has demonstrated religious types will band
together in their "common" cause no matter, there doesn't need to be a mob on hand to get Muslims falling in line with the cries of blasphemy, the mere accusation of it has prompted him to agree with the baseless accusation even though there seems to be no evidence of it.
Last edited by Stinky; 22-09-2010 at 12:05 PM.
It wasn't me!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)