Schoolgirl makes small fortune as weekend prostitute
Source: http://www.smh.com.au/Originally Posted by From merry old Engerland
No wonder kids aint interested in careers with Tescos these days![]()

Schoolgirl makes small fortune as weekend prostitute
Source: http://www.smh.com.au/Originally Posted by From merry old Engerland
No wonder kids aint interested in careers with Tescos these days![]()
What else would a pommie bird be good for, anyone got a picture of her

She is PolishOriginally Posted by Rigger
Is that Polish as in Poland or polish as in knob polish.Originally Posted by mrsquirrel

Are you Stupid as in dumb as my shoe or stupid as in as thick as two short planks?Originally Posted by Johnny Longprong

^ Ummm ... I see that Korean sense of humour has rubbed off on someone![]()

If it wasn't for that nosey teacher rifling through her school bag, she could have been a millionaire and retired by the time she was 21.
If the authorities keep the cash are they then profiting from the proceeds of prostitution ?
![]()

Not realy, as the cost of the police, courts, social services, administration etc will far exceed the 8K found in the girls house.Originally Posted by Happyman
Its a funny one (funny weird, not ha ha). I suppose the funds were whats that phrase "profits from a crime" or whatever. However, as the girl was not charged.....(from the article), seem a bit dodgy.
I suppose the point is, its not like she gets magically unf*cked cause they took the money - maybe should have been kept and somehow directly used for her welfare? Dunno.
What is the age of consent in UK anyway?
^She does not need to be charged, they are still immoral earnings.

Daily Mail had her as 100,000 a year - they extarpolated her monthly earnings. Makes a better story that way![]()
Not really arguing, but surely the categorization of "immoral earnings" must come AFTER a conviction for prostitution?
And, I have an itchy feeling that its a crime to "live off immoral earnings" (i.e. pimp), not sure that the money itself for a prostitute are legally siezable??
just mulling.
Yes. Quite a difference between her "immoral" earnings and the big banks and corporations that have been "morally" screwing the public with impunity.Originally Posted by English Noodles
Not realy.Originally Posted by Norton
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)