Thread: US has struck 3 Iranian nuclear sites, Trump says, joining Israeli air campaign

Originally Posted by 39TG

I think Looper makes many good points. I understood people such as John Bolton claimed the original agreement with Iran was shxt and buck passing the issue to future presidents. Mr. Biden wasn't up to it and so the problem landed on Mr. Trump's desk. I wish the American political system would push younger men into the White House.

Who do you suggest. Jd Vance? Hegseth? Both a couple of slippery characters

Originally Posted by 39TG

I think Looper makes many good points.

Of course you do.

I understood people such as John Bolton claimed the original agreement with Iran was shxt and buck passing the issue to future presidents. Mr. Biden wasn't up to it and so the problem landed on Mr. Trump's desk. I wish the American political system would push younger men into the White House.

The John Bolton who supported the Iraqi invasion that was based on false intelligence and created Islamic State?

Well fuck, we should listen to what he says then.

Originally Posted by Looper

A virtuosi masterclass in the peanut gallery school of debating style from Sizzle and Hazza

Yes, America is bombing Iran over Israel's nuclear claims, the witless fuck offers:

Originally Posted by Looper

It is possible to argue that Trump should not have walked away from JCPOA.

And he thinks that's worth debating.

What a fucking moron.

From the peanut gallery debate style tutorial to the 'girlfriend on her period' style of political debate:

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Yes, America is bombing Iran over Israel's nuclear claims, the witless fuck offers:

"It is possible to argue that Trump should not have walked away from JCPOA."

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

And he thinks that's worth debating.

What a fucking moron.

If you think there is a good argument for why Trump should not have walked away from JCPOA just say what you think.

The 'I am not going to tell you what I think, you have to guess what I think from my breathless exasperation' debating posture is for girls in frilly dresses.

Is anyone but Looper himself impressed by his ‘debating’ style?

Originally Posted by beachbound

I’ll humor you, Loopey.

They would have been severely restricted on the amount uranium enrichment, for 15 years. There would have been limits on their centrifuges, for 10 years. Research and development limitations for 10 years. And most importantly, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA regular access to its nuclear facilities.

Anything would have been a better plan, than just pulling out of the deal, altogether. Much like his answer to Obama care, where he had “concepts of a plan“
Corporal Cheez-its, has no real answers. He just couldn’t stand the fact that Obama helped broker the deal.

Would Iran have upheld their end of the bargain? We’ll never know.

Good answer BB, and much better than name calling.

“totally obliterated”-DJT


Perhaps Pvt. Poopy-Pants shouldn’t use such big words, when he obviously doesn’t know their meaning!
WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL, June 24 (Reuters) - U.S. airstrikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability and only set it back by a few months, according to one initial U.S. intelligence assessment, as a shaky ceasefire brokered by President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel.

reuters.com

Originally Posted by pickel

Good answer BB, and much better than name calling.

And also stating the fucking obvious you fucking moron.

Originally Posted by pickel

much better than name calling.

Apparently, the only way Snubby thinks he can win an argument.

Originally Posted by Troy

Apparently, the only way Snubby thinks he can win an argument.

And Harry does it even when you agree with him. Tough crowd.

Originally Posted by pickel

Tough crowd.

No respect! I tell ya, I get no respect!

Originally Posted by beachbound

They would have been severely restricted on the amount uranium enrichment, for 15 years. There would have been limits on their centrifuges, for 10 years. Research and development limitations for 10 years. And most importantly, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA regular access to its nuclear facilities.

Would Iran have upheld their end of the bargain? We’ll never know.

A fair and cogent summary of the merits of the JCPOA agreement from our erudite scholar, BB.

Originally Posted by DrWilly

Is anyone but Looper himself impressed by his ‘debating’ style?

Looks like the debating heavy cavalry has entered the field of battle so I may have to beat a tactical retreat and regroup.

Originally Posted by Looper

the 'girlfriend on her period' style of political debate:


The 'I am not going to tell you what I think, you have to guess what I think from my breathless exasperation' debating posture is for girls in frilly dresses.

Do you think of yourself as a misogynist at all?

Mr. Trump's post bombing behavior is extraordinary. I find the cowardice of the GOP at calling Mr. Trump to account for the lies about the success of the bombing and cease fire agreements even more troubling.

Originally Posted by 39TG

Mr. Trump's post bombing behavior is extraordinary. I find the cowardice of the GOP at calling Mr. Trump to account for the lies about the success of the bombing and cease fire agreements even more troubling.

You don't find their general supineness in the last nine years troubling?

All they've ever done is support every piece of shit the orange turd utters.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Do you think of yourself as a misogynist at all?

Pete Hegseth also copped some flack from the New York Times for saying 'our boys on those bombers' during his press conference after the bombing run.

The NYT got in a high frump, stating 'yet both men and women have been trained to fly them'

Hegseth was still being accurate since the crew were in fact all male, apparently.

The Left and its tedious and banal censoriousness towards traditional, culturally rich, gendered language, in favour of neutered, bland, flavourless NewSpeak is disappearing up its own arsehole in irrelevance.

Speaking of tedious…

You have to laugh when you read such gems as...

the whereabouts of about 400kg of highly enriched uranium is unknown.

Originally Posted by Looper

Pete Hegseth also copped some flack from the New York Times for saying 'our boys on those bombers' during his press conference after the bombing run.

The NYT got in a high frump, stating 'yet both men and women have been trained to fly them'

Hegseth was still being accurate since the crew were in fact all male, apparently.

The Left and its tedious and banal censoriousness towards traditional, culturally rich, gendered language, in favour of neutered, bland, flavourless NewSpeak is disappearing up its own arsehole in irrelevance.

Possibly hegseth demanded that no female or transgender pilots be allowed to fly?

Originally Posted by BLD

Possibly hegseth demanded that no female or transgender pilots be allowed to fly?

More dog whistling to the trumpanzees.

And the loopers of this world yelp in response.

Originally Posted by Loopey

I may have to beat a tactical retreat and regroup.

May have to? You always do! You have no rebuttal, so in usual Loopey fashion, you ignore or obfuscate, and wait for the next controversy, regurgitate some MAGA bullshit, and the cycle begins again.

You’re a pompous bore.

by the way, I noticed you ignored Trump’s complete exaggeration, of the success of his bombing mission. :crickets:


“totally obliterated”

Originally Posted by beachbound

by the way, I noticed you ignored Trump’s complete exaggeration, of the success of his bombing mission

I was not aware that my opinion had been requested. But, if that is an invitation then I would say:

It is disappointing and petulant that Trump engages in this routine denial of anything that might not reflect well. It just seems to be his style. I think everyone sees through it, so I don't really regard it as a seriously pernicious attempt to deceive. Still, it would be more statesmanlike of him to be more honest.

The bombings may or may not have had the decisive effect that they were supposed to have. We don't know yet. But, either way they have set a precedent for Iran that they can expect to have the shit bombed out of them if they try to build a nuclear weapon, which may discourage further attempts.

If they managed to squirrel away their 60% uranium maybe they will figure out selling it is simpler than trying to progress their enrichment further. Or, maybe they will build their next enrichment facility underneath a hospital in Tehran for better protection.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

More dog whistling to the trumpanzees.

And the loopers of this world yelp in response.

I don't think choosing to use culturally traditional, gendered language, like 'our boys', is dog-whistling. Many people are getting a bit tired of the Left's petty obsession with sterilised language policing.