^You mean exposing these two who were at work when they did this video
The Israeli in the above article states the police had not told him where to send the video so he posted it online.
^You mean exposing these two who were at work when they did this video
The Israeli in the above article states the police had not told him where to send the video so he posted it online.
When you are in a hole willy, its best you stop digging.
Wherever your sympathies lie, the racist hate fille rants and threats of the two medics cannot be condoned.
They cannot be allowed to continue working with patients at the hospital, and should be prosecuted for disseminating hate.
The Israeli is quite right to publish that video. The proponents of hate and terrorism must be exposed before they lead to deaths. Do you think those two ragheads, because thats exactly what they are, should not have been exposed, and if so state your reasons.
Come on willy. You seem to have gone very quiet for once.
And heres something else for you to chew over willy. Nobody on the fucking planet want these whingeing miserable hate filled troublemakers.
The UK shouldn’t take a single Gazan refugee
We’ve got quite enough Hamas supporters in our cities without adding another wave to the mess
Sam Ashworth-Hayes
The news that a family of six Gazans who applied to enter the UK through a route intended for Ukrainians were granted permission on human rights grounds has produced a horrified response on both the Left and the Right.
The Right is horrified that they were allowed to come. The Left is horrified that Sir Keir Starmer has indicated his desire to close this loophole, and that people are unwilling to extend to Gaza the welcome extended to Kyiv.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, my sympathies lie very much with the Right. Anyone calling for Gazans to come to the UK should be extremely careful what they wish for. It is notable, for instance, that Arab countries vocal in their support for a Palestinian state are similarly vocal about their desire to avoid admitting any additional Palestinian refugees.
Egypt doesn’t want more. Jordan doesn’t want more. This is true now of Donald Trump’s mooted plan for permanent displacement, and it was true just 12 days after the October 7 terror attack, when King Abdullah II stated “no refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt”.
This attitude is based in part on the risk that any such transfer could prove permanent, but also in Egypt’s case concern that militants could carry out attacks against Israel from the Sinai.
It should give Britain pause, too. Do we really trust that we will be able to flawlessly identify potential radicals amid those seeking to come here? Our vetting can barely pick out obvious frauds, with one immigration expert remarking last year that while the Home Office is quite good at cross-checking spelling errors on paperwork provided by claimants, such as hospital forms, it was less good at checking the hospital actually existed.
Given that one notable challenge with taking people from war zones controlled by proscribed terrorist organisations is verifying the legitimacy of paperwork and stories, this shouldn’t fill us with confidence.
As Jake Wallis Simons has noted in these pages, some Palestinian schoolbooks in the relatively moderate West Bank glorify terrorists who took part in the murder of Israeli civilians. Those raised under the watchful eye of Hamas – a proscribed terrorist organisation here – seem unlikely to have been given lessons on loving their Jewish neighbours. If surveys are to be believed, some 57 per cent of the Gazan population still supported the October 7 attacks last summer, even after months of Israeli military response. Almost all Palestinians denied that Hamas had committed any crimes against Israeli civilians. A comparable percentage wanted Hamas to retain control of the Strip.
By September, support had dipped slightly. Only 39 per cent thought the attack had been a good idea, and 36 per cent wanted armed “resistance”. But the point holds: there is no need for Britain to risk airlifting radical supporters of Palestinian terror groups into cities where some seem to already exist.
And it’s this point, incidentally, which utterly destroys any attempts to draw parallels with Ukraine. Ukraine was a peaceful country invaded by an aggressive neighbour. Some Gazans celebrated in the streets as hostages were dragged through crowds.
The civilians of Gaza may not be responsible for Hamas atrocities. But it would be foolish to pretend that such levels of support would not have implications for British social cohesion.
Experience tells us that we could expect fiscal costs, too. In 2017, migrants who came to the UK for asylum had an employment rate of 51 per cent, well below the 73 per cent for the UK born. Those in employment earned 55 per cent less per week, working fewer hours for lower wages.
As the Office for Budget Responsibility has noted, low-skilled migrants present a net fiscal cost of £151,000 by the time they claim the state pension at 66. By 80, this rises to around £500,000. As asylum migrants are more likely to have health conditions, these costs may well be understated. And as our courts have helpfully illustrated, a limited flow today gives rise to chain migration tomorrow.
For an example of just how badly wrong kind-hearted schemes can go, we can turn to Denmark. In 1991, Copenhagen rejected the asylum applications of 321 Palestinians. Some claimed sanctuary in local churches, and a political storm erupted. Could a modern European state not find it in its heart to offer these people shelter?
Eventually, in 1992, a special law was passed. The 321 Palestinians – and only the 321 – would be given residence permits. How well were they integrated? By 2019, 71 members of the group had been handed a prison sentence (some suspended). Another 133 had been fined. By 2011, 200 working-age members of the cohort were claiming public benefits. And their children performed only slightly better. By 2019, of the 999 residing in Denmark, 132 had been given a prison sentence, some suspended, and 372 were claiming public funds.
As the then-acting integration minister sadly noted, Denmark had been careless with who it admitted. All it could do was learn for the future. Britain has made plenty of migration mistakes already.
This is one we should avoid adding to the list.
© Telegraph Media Group Holdings Limited 2025
I think it's good that he published the video. It helps the public assess the dangers they face when dealing with NSW Health. The government needs to put some safeguards in place. I see the investigation is being lead by the New South Wales Police Force’s antisemitism task force. Australia appears to have a very serious problem with antisemitism that even extends to the government itself. There's a perception that the Labor government hates Israel. I understand the Labour caucus in the UK has also had difficulties with anti-semitic attitudes.
I see Pauline Hanson has her knickers in a twist over this incident. No surprise there. I read on Wiki that the old dear is now 70 years old.
One of the nurses an addict or dealer?
Nurse at centre of alleged anti-Semitic video has locker raided
A major twist in the investigation of two NSW nurses who were filmed during a rant claiming they would kill Israeli patients has been revealed.
Ahmed Rashid Nadir and Sarah Abu Lebdeh were sacked from NSW Health after the video went viral worldwide.
However, it has since been revealed by 7NEWS that police allegedly found a vial of morphine in Nadir’s personal locker at Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital in Sydney’s southwest.
It’s understood Nadir allegedly asked a former colleague to empty his locker.
But that staff member claimed they felt uncomfortable and instead called the police.
The vial was seized by police and is expected to form part of the investigation into the nurses, 7NEWS reported.
Israeli content creator, Max Veifer, uploaded the full unedited video, which shows the nurses threatening to kill Israelis, to his Instagram on Friday morning.
Mr Veifer often uses Chatruletka and Omegle, online platforms that pair users in random video chats, to expose instances of anti-Semitism and also to learn English.
The two nurses were recorded for a full two-and-a-half minutes, by Mr Veifer when they appeared on the chat.
https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw...73f2e98be852f9
I wouldnt give those two the steam off my piss, yet willy the loser still wants to give them the benefit of the doubt, a pat on the back and probably give the guy a sloppy bj too.
Aaaand he’s back highlighting his poor showing in an argument by resorting to smut.
None of what you have written is even remotely true. Show me where I have suggested giving them the benefit of the doubt?
Well seeing as you asked.
Willy. You suggested that it was the motive of the Israeli who posted the video that needed to be questioned.
And then you posted this.
And that is most certainly, "the benefit of the doubt"Agreed, but there is no indication that this occurred. Literally just a very nasty and unpleasant video right now.
The fact that a vial of morphine was found in a locker belonging to one of the ragheads is strongly indicative of the fact they intended to cause harm, or death to a patient, as they gleefully stated in the video.
Why cant you just accept the fact that these ragheads are not your middle of the road law abiding muslim but extremist islamist scum with terrorist intentiond need to be kept away from patients and the general public. i.e. jailed.
You really are trying to square that triangle. You’re either desperately trying to win an internet argument and clumsily resorting to bullshit or your comprehension really is that weak. Given your previous interactions with seeking asylum I can only conclude it was most likely that latter.
He really had your number. Those exchanges were cringeworthy. You were like that one little kid on the playground chasing around the senior kids saying wanna fight? I’m as strong as you…
One vial of morphine suggests he uses or sells the drug.![]()
^
and that post illustrates perfectly why, as you near the end of your working life, you find yourself at the bottom of the heap in bongo bongo land, and not at the top of the tree in singapore, sydney, munich or london.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)