Results 1 to 18 of 18

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Isle of discombobulation Joe 90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Mai Arse
    Posts
    15,825
    So you think Nationalisation is the solution?

    You need to get out more...

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,705
    A joint government/employee ownership would be the best solution.

    Perhaps they would be less willing to return to the days of the Winters of Discontent if they actually had an interest in the company performing well.

    The public want a working railway system.

    The employees want a fair wage.

    Why does it need to be a profit centre?
    The next post may be brought to you by my little bitch Spamdreth

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat DrWilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    16,815
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    if they actually had an interest in the company performing well.


    Why does it need to be a profit centre?


    Asked and answered.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    21,308
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post

    Why does it need to be a profit centre?
    with out profit ...

    1. there are no funds for wage increases.
    2. there are no funds for infrastructure or rolling stock upgrades.
    3. there is no incentive to increase productivity or efficiency.
    4. the taxpayer will end up paying more and more each year to fund it.

    just look at how the nhs swallows up more and more funding each year with no improvement in service delivered. its run by ideological planning committees instead of economic graduate managers.

    rail privatisation was badly thought out and poorly implemented and re-nationalisation by a union dominated labour government will be even worse.

    Rail Privatisation - Success or Failure? - Economics Help

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,705
    Quote Originally Posted by taxexile View Post
    with out profit ...

    1. there are no funds for wage increases.
    2. there are no funds for infrastructure or rolling stock upgrades.
    3. there is no incentive to increase productivity or efficiency.
    4. the taxpayer will end up paying more and more each year to fund it.

    just look at how the nhs swallows up more and more funding each year with no improvement in service delivered. its run by ideological planning committees instead of economic graduate managers.

    rail privatisation was badly thought out and poorly implemented and re-nationalisation by a union dominated labour government will be even worse.

    Rail Privatisation - Success or Failure? - Economics Help
    Yes, why don't you just take one line out of context and paint the scenario you think fits?

    I said:

    A joint government/employee ownership would be the best solution.
    Yes, investment is needed, but on an ongoing basis profits can be used to fund wage increases or, you know, a profit share?

    And thus:

    3. there is no incentive to increase productivity or efficiency.
    Getting direct rewards for your efforts is infinitely preferable to going on strike to get them, which is what happened the last time.

    Try and think out side the wholly private/wholly nationalised options for even a minute.

    And don't compare it with the NHS, the tories have been deliberately trying to fuck that up for years to try and force privatisation.

    They would love the US model for the personal benefits it would bring them.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •