Page 135 of 161 FirstFirst ... 3585125127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143145 ... LastLast
Results 3,351 to 3,375 of 4024

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    malmomike77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    16,477
    It wouldn't surprise me if Putin went nuclear just over the border if Ukraine get close to Russian territory.

  2. #2
    Heading down to Dino's
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    31,864
    Quote Originally Posted by malmomike77 View Post
    It wouldn't surprise me if Putin went nuclear just over the border if Ukraine get close to Russian territory.
    Dude, where have you been? A day late and a dollar short. Belgrade oblast has been under constant attack by the Ukrainians for days now.

    https://twitter.com/igorsushko/statu...63794021646337

    Stop with the entire nukes BS. It will not happen, if it did the US would open a massive can of whoopass on the ruzzians. Biden already said that the US would smoke the Black Sea fleet and decimate what is left of the ruzzian army in Ukraine.

  3. #3
    Heading down to Dino's
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    31,864

    Ukraine’s cross-border tactics are aimed at destabilizing Russia.

    Ukraine’s cross-border tactics are aimed at destabilizing Russia. Judging by the response, they’re working

    Ukraine has opened a new front in its battle to drive out the Russian invader - in Russia. But it is oddly coy about admitting that it has sent troops, fired artillery, and flown drones into its neighbor’s territory.

    The operations of Russian citizens, carrying Ukrainian military ID, wearing Ukrainian uniforms and attacking from Ukraine, remain officially opaque. It is Kyiv’s contribution to what’s become known as “hybrid warfare” in the “grey zone” of contemporary conflict.

    The two terms provoked books and a tsunami of excited opinion from an army of pundits when Russia first invaded Ukraine in 2014.

    Back then, “Little Green Men” in peculiar two-tone sport-hunting uniforms – and Russian military fatigues – appeared in Crimea.

    When it was suggested that maybe, just maybe, these men were actually Russian troops, Vladimir Putin quipped “You can go to a store and buy any kind of uniform”.

    Moscow’s official line was that the men who raised the Russian flag over Simferopol and stormed Crimea’s local parliament were “self defense units” of pro-Russian Ukrainians anxious to bring their territory under Moscow’s rule.

    By the time Moscow admitted that its troops were actually in Ukraine, a large chunk of the 23-year-old, former Soviet nation was under Putin’s control.

    Now, on a small scale, Ukraine is adapting those same tactics to try to secure strategic effect.

    The Russian Volunteer Corps and the Freedom for Russia Legion – which fall under Ukraine’s Defence Intelligence structure – have been conducting short cross-border raids into Russia.
    The principal aim? Destabilization.

    While the terminology and methods may have evolved, there’s nothing new about the tactic. Aside from Russia, South Africa’s apartheid regimes used similar techniques through the 1970s and 1980s, attacking the Frontline States of Angola, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Mozambique.

    Pretoria sent troops on cross-border raids to destabilize the independent African nations opposed to its racist rule. They often posed as local liberation fighters in classic “false flag” attacks against civilians, trying to undermine support for liberation movements.

    These groups were frequently formed of fighters from Angola, or Zimbabwe, to add “authenticity” to the atrocities they hoped to attribute to others. They were often led by white men in blackface camouflage.

    The long term aim – and many times, the result - was to keep the nations supporting South Africa’s internal liberation struggle permanently off-balance.

    Russia rattled

    In Ukraine, it suits Kyiv to have Russians invade Russia on its behalf.

    The tactical results may be limited. Brief incursions into small border villages. But the desired effect of destabilization in Russia is achieved.

    Russian TV has been awash in breathless, and terrified, reports by local journalists on the artillery attacks against Russian towns.

    The governor of Belgorod – the region worst hit by the latest Ukrainian campaign – has evacuated hundreds of civilians, has been in personal telephone contact with Putin, and has already picked up a bravery gong for his efforts.

    Meanwhile the Freedom for Russia Legion is posting advertisements on its Telegram channel for drone pilots to join its ranks.

    It may, or may not, be behind the growing numbers of drone strikes that have hit Russian territory, from the Kremlin and the upscale Moscow suburbs favored by Putin’s allies, to the cities of Kursk, Smelensk and Krasnador.

    The point is to make the attacks inside Russia feel like they have a significant Russian flavor - to suggest that more Russians are heeding the dissident “Cry Freedom” and joining in a homegrown effort to depose Putin.

    Both the Russian Volunteer Corps and the Freedom for Russia Legion claim to have supporters in their home country.

    They may indeed. Someone unleashed the blue and white flag of the Russian opposition movement over Moscow last week. Someone’s helping with either flying, or training, drones onto Russian targets.

    As far as Ukraine is concerned, the more Russians think that their compatriots are involved in attacking the Russian regime the better. Doubt itself is destabilizing.

    Judging by the rhetoric coming from Russia, it’s working.

    Opening a meeting with his Security Council on Friday, Putin said “ill-wishers” must be prevented from destabilizing Russia.

    He said the council would focus on ensuring domestic political security, taking into account the enemy’s intensified efforts “to stir up the situation within the Russian Federation.”

    “We must exert every possible effort not to allow them to do this under any circumstances,” Putin added.

    War coming home

    Ukraine could ask for no greater ally in this strategy than Yezgeny Prigozhin, the outspoken leader of Russian mercenary group Wagner.

    “Wagner PMC wants at least of one month of recovery as it was a tough job, tough year… And then there will be the next scuffles, I think, most likely this time on Russian territory,” he said after the incursions and drone attacks against Russia.

    As a bonus for Kyiv, Prigozhin went on to lambast Russia’s military leadership. The Russian chain of command was “controlled by clowns who just treat men as cannon fodder,” he said, adding, “then we won’t be part of this chain.”

    On the drone attacks on Moscow over the past week, he had this to say to Russia’s generals: “You stinking animals, what are you doing? You are swine! Get up off your asses from the offices you’ve been put in to defend this country.”

    Dmitry Medvedev, a close Putin ally, was similarly rattled by the extent to which war has come to Russia. He reacted with something close to hysteria.

    “It’s clear what response is needed: They need to be annihilated, not just in a personal capacity, but we have to destroy them in the hornets’ nest itself. The regime that has developed in Ukraine should be exterminated,” said Medvedev.

    He may sound like a Nazi but his words contained sinister echoes of the genocidal Holodomor of the 1930s, when, under the Soviet Union, an estimated three million Ukrainians were deliberately starved to death, middle class farmers were eradicated and the Ukrainian language banned.

    But such fulminations may not impress ordinary Russians.

    The Belgorod governor says dozens of strikes hit border districts inside Russia over last day or so.

    In a long post on his Telegram channel, Vyacheslav Gladkov said that much of the incoming fire was artillery and mortar against border districts. There had been damage to roads, property and vehicles, he added, while 12 people had been injured in 24 hours in the border town of Shebekino.

    One woman who spoke to a pro-Russian Telegram channel said Shebekino was “on fire, the battles there are ongoing,” adding: “We have fled the city. “

    “There are very few of our people there. Previous days with all the shelling - there was almost no response, no (Russian) military. We were left on our own,” the unnamed woman said. CNN is unable to verify her account of events.

    But her views may spread. And Russia’s response to the campaign on its soil may destabilize its military campaign inside Ukraine - and with it the politics at home.

    Ukraine's cross-border tactics are aimed at destabilizing Russia. Judging by the response, they're working | CNN

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    859
    ^ It is a good tactic by Ukraine. Send Russians to fight Russians so only Russians will die. A suicide mission really but it will test the response of the Russian military and give Russia a small taste of what Ukraine is getting.

  5. #5
    Heading down to Dino's
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    31,864
    Quote Originally Posted by Stretchy View Post
    A suicide mission really but it will test the response of the Russian military
    It is not a suicide mission as none of these incursions have resulted in large loses aside from one KIA. The response is clear. It was chaos with no real forces being sent because the ruzzians have no troops internally.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretchy View Post
    Russian military
    The "best" died last year now we are deep into the conscripts. All the "trainers" have been sent, they died, All of OMAN was sent they got smoked, Spetnaz is totally smoked. What is left?

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat helge's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    13,112
    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    The "best" died last year now we are deep into the conscripts. All the "trainers" have been sent, they died, All of OMAN was sent they got smoked, Spetnaz is totally smoked. What is left?
    You could be right, but are guessing

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    859
    is not a suicide mission as none of these incursions have resulted in large loses aside from one KIA
    Are they still in Russia now? Or did they retreat back to Ukraine? If only one killed, why retreat?
    What is your source of only one killed?

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat
    Troy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:27 PM
    Location
    In the EU
    Posts
    13,087
    ^ They are skirmishes, which often move back and forth to probe and cause problems. However, I think one killed is just BS. Even the RVC announced 2 killed. I doubt it was as many as the Russian estimate of 70 but there must have been casualties.


    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    The "best" died last year now we are deep into the conscripts.
    Many of the best Russian troops were killed last year but quite a few survived and they have been behind the front line with conscripts being used since then.

    However, you fail to understand that numbers eventually win a war of attrition. Just ask the Americans or French in Vietnam.

  9. #9
    Elite Mumbler
    pickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Isolation
    Posts
    8,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    However, you fail to understand that numbers eventually win a war of attrition. Just ask the Americans or French in Vietnam.
    Do you think the Russian people would be okay with another massive mobilization?

    The Americans and French eventually left Vietnam. It will be the same for Russia in Ukraine. The same as it was for them in Afghanistan. People don't like being invaded, and tend to have higher morale than the invaders. Can you name an invading country that won a war with low morale?
    Originally Posted by sabang
    Maybe Canada should join Nato.

  10. #10
    Thailand Expat
    Troy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:27 PM
    Location
    In the EU
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by pickel View Post
    Can you name an invading country that won a war with low morale?
    Let's put this in the correct context, can you name a country that won a war of attrition with less men?

    Ukraine needs to win the political battle, it can never win in terms of attrition, not even with the help of the West unless a full scale war is declared.

  11. #11
    Elite Mumbler
    pickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Isolation
    Posts
    8,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    Let's put this in the correct context, can you name a country that won a war of attrition with less men?
    You're being a bit presumptious in thinking Russia has already introduced the men required to win a war of attrition to the battlefield.

    Like I said:

    Quote Originally Posted by pickel View Post
    Do you think the Russian people would be okay with another massive mobilization?
    Not to mention the materiel required for those men to use. Russia is depleting their inventory, and Ukraine is replenishing theirs.

  12. #12
    Thailand Expat
    Troy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:27 PM
    Location
    In the EU
    Posts
    13,087
    ^ Well, that's not quite true is it. Russia still has the means and is building more military equipment. Ukraine is relying on supplies from the West.

    There needs to be a breakdown in Russia, one that topples the current Putin regime. Ukraine cannot rely on the West forever.

  13. #13
    Heading down to Dino's
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    31,864
    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    Many of the best Russian troops were killed last year but quite a few survived and they have been behind the front line with conscripts being used since then.
    Yet you say my posts are BS. Over the course of this war all the "quality" units the ruzzians had have been attritted and in some cases many times over. I doubt you can name one specific ruzzian unit that has not been ground into dust by the Ukrainians. Just as an example, the first guards tank army (ruzzia's most "elite" tank army) has been smoked 3–4 times.

    Beaten Twice In Ukraine, Russia’s Elite 1st Guards Tank Army Is Poised To Attack Yet Again

    The ruzzians are down to just conscripts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    can you name a country that won a war of attrition with less men?
    Vietnam did it in 1979 against China, Finland did it against the ruzzians during the winter war of 39-40. Just two examples.

    Quote Originally Posted by pickel View Post
    You're being a bit presumptious in thinking Russia has already introduced the men required to win a war of attrition to the battlefield.
    The ruzzians are scraping the bottom of the barrel for manpower.

    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    Russia still has the means and is building more military equipment.
    Barely. The sanctions have crippled production, and the ruzzians have a fraction of the manufacturing capacity of the old Soviet Union. Production of new units is barely a trickle and is hardly enough to sustain the ruzzian war machine.

    I think you are applying a very dated metric to this war by thinking that the Soviet model is still intact. It isn't, it dissolved in 1991 and the old Soviet industry has been deteriorating and/or been dismantled since.

  14. #14
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:44 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    35,385
    “There is no greater danger than underestimating your opponent.”
    ― Lao Tzu

    Reading through this thread clearly many need to heed Lao Tzu's advice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    Let's put this in the correct context, can you name a country that won a war of attrition with less men?
    Sure a couple can be found but numbers matter a great deal. Russia has double the population of potential men at arms and 10 times the economy to sustain the war. No way can the Ukraine achieve their stated "win" objectives of retaking and holding all territory occupied by Russia, including the Crimea.

    As with all wars, this war will end with some sort of agreement between Ukraine and Russia. Would be pure speculation at this point to say what the agreement might be or when it will happen but certainly will not end soon.

    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    There needs to be a breakdown in Russia, one that topples the current Putin regime.
    Depends who replaces Putin. Possible a regime far worse than Putin's will take control. There are a couple waiting in the wings.
    "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"

  15. #15
    Elite Mumbler
    pickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Isolation
    Posts
    8,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    There needs to be a breakdown in Russia, one that topples the current Putin regime.
    And that's exactly what would happen if Putin tried to do another massive mobilization to reach the attrition levels you speak of. Their modern war systems also require a lot of Western parts and electronics, parts that are no longer available to them.

  16. #16
    Heading down to Dino's
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    31,864
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    10 times the economy to sustain the war.
    Absolutely incorrect. The ruzzian economy is the size of Spain's, and it is currently reeling due to sanctions. It is not sustaining the war now let alone in the future, as I stated before its production capacity is a fraction of its wartime consumption and that is why it has almost completely exhausted its war stocks even recently sending T-55's to the front.

    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    No way can the Ukraine achieve their stated "win" objectives of retaking and holding all territory occupied by Russia, including the Crimea.
    A lot of distinguished Generals and experts would disagree with you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    There needs to be a breakdown in Russia, one that topples the current Putin regime.
    Exactly why Prigozhin moved Wagner back into ruzzia proper. He even said so himself.

  17. #17
    Elite Mumbler
    pickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Isolation
    Posts
    8,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    Depends who replaces Putin. Possible a regime far worse than Putin's will take control. There are a couple waiting in the wings.
    There's also a couple waiting in jail.

  18. #18
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:44 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    35,385
    Quote Originally Posted by pickel View Post
    None more than Putin.
    Definately!

  19. #19
    Thailand Expat misskit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    54,281
    Russian TV airs apparent deepfake video of Putin ordering martial law amid reports Ukraine is on the attack

    A fake Putin declared in a video address that Ukraine's army invaded Russia and he's ordering martial law.


    The fake video was aired, due to a reported hacking, in border areas where anxiety is already high.


    Russian sources reported increased Ukrainian attacks at positions along the front lines on Monday.


    Something was slightly off about the Russian President Vladimir Putin whose emergency address was broadcast into some Russian homes on Monday. The deep lines in the 70-year-old leader's furrowed brow seemed to disappear too smoothly as his expression changed.


    That's because it was apparently a fake, and a stunning one at that.


    Appearing with the caption, "President's emergency appeal," the seemingly digitized Russian leader says that Ukraine's army has entered three border regions where he's declaring martial law and urges listeners to "evacuate deep" into Russia. Some TV and radio stations in these areas aired it due to what Russian officials called a hack; they did not identify any culprits.


    "Definitely there was no address. It is true that there were hacks in some regions," said Putin's chief spokesman Dmitry Peskov, according to the state-run TASS news agency. "In particular, I know that there was a hack into Radio Mir and into some networks. Now all this has been eliminated and taken under control."

    Unease has been growing in Russia's border areas in recent weeks as small groups of armed anti-Putin Russian militants have stormed past border guards, forcing heavy military responses to expel them. The message delivered by fake Putin via television and radio seemed to play to these anxieties.


    "Russians, brothers and sisters, today at 4 am, Ukrainian troops armed by the NATO bloc with the consent and support of Washington invaded the territories of the Kursk, Belgorod and Bryansk regions," the announcement begins, according to a Russian account of the fake address. As it continues, Putin supposedly then goes on to order a mass mobilization, a step sure to trigger widespread concern that he's so far resisted taking in full.


    The timing of the fake broadcast is also notable because Russian sources reported increased Ukrainian attacks at multiple positions along the long front lines on Monday. US satellites also detected movements and more activity from Ukraine's forces, The New York Times reported. Only time will tell if these moves are part of their looming counter-offensive to retake stolen land.

    Russian TV airs apparent deepfake video of Putin ordering martial law amid reports Ukraine is on the attack

  20. #20
    Elite Mumbler
    pickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Isolation
    Posts
    8,071
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    “There is no greater danger than underestimating your opponent.”
    ― Lao Tzu

    Reading through this thread clearly many need to heed Lao Tzu's advice.
    None more than Putin.

  21. #21
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:44 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    35,385
    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    A lot of distinguished Generals and experts would disagree with you.
    Good for them. Guess as just a non expert old git with a fair amount of war history knowlege and first hand experience has it all wrong.

    Russia is already defeated and will give up and withdraw from all occupied areas in short order. Got it!

  22. #22
    Thailand Expat helge's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    13,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
    can you name a country that won a war of attrition with less men?
    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    Vietnam did it in 1979 against China, Finland did it against the ruzzians during the winter war of 39-40. Just two examples.
    ?....

  23. #23
    Thailand Expat misskit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    54,281
    War reaches Russian border regions

    “Defending people and, first of all, defending Russia,” is how Vladimir Putin explained the goal of the Ukraine invasion in January 2023. Meanwhile, according to the data posted by Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), Russian regions have been attacked over 2,000 times since the start of the war. On 1 June, the town of Shebekino in the Belgorod region, with the population of 40,000 people, was subjected to record-breaking rounds of shelling. In total, 52 civilians have been killed and 242 injured on Russian territory since February 2022 (as of June 2, 2023), Novaya-Europe estimates.


    The Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said in May that the “special military operation” would continue so as not to let the shelling of Russian territories go on. But with each month of combat, the frequency of air attacks has only grown.

    In May, heads of regions reported record-breaking 281 attacks — a number four times higher than in April. On average, about eight towns and villages get shelled daily. Over 2,000 civilian and industrial facilities, including oil terminals, multi-storey residential buildings in Moscow, and the dome of the Kremlin, became the targets of these attacks.


    In total, 52 Russian civilians have been killed over the course of the war, and 242 have been wounded. Over half of the victims are from the Belgorod region.


    The Russian settlements that get shelled most often are:


    The Tetkino village in the Kursk region. The residents of the village asked to be evacuated a year ago, but only 29 people were moved to temporary accommodation centres. Ukraine’s Armed Forces shelled Tetkino at least eight times in May.


    The town of Shebekino and the neighbouring villages of Murom and Novaya Tavolzhanka. Since the start of the war, this area has been attacked nearly a 100 times.


    The city of Belgorod. On 1 June, drones flew into the city twice. One of the drones crashed into a road, wounding two men. Since the beginning of the war, Belgorod has been subjected to drone attacks 28 times.

    MORE War reaches Russian border regions

  24. #24
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    06-01-2025 @ 03:13 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,413
    The discourse on the last couple of pages is a tad off the mark, imho.

    1) Russia are doing exceptionally badly in this war across the board; their losses are massive in personnel, equipment, their government stability and economy; they are losing at every level. They do have some Ukrainian territory, and keeping it would involve endless problems for them. The military tactics are from WW2, effective in destroying cities with artillery, but generally poor; they don't seem able to adapt well or learn from their mistakes either.

    2) Ukraine has suffered massively due to a large and powerful invading war machine. They are fighting hard, have a large population of soldiers. The training of soldiers is hugely better than the Russian conscripts due to the fact they are being taken out of the country and trained for months at high quality armies around Europe (and some US?). They have equal, and in some cases superior military equipment to Russia (now). They use modern military tactics and are quick to learn/adapt.

    3) I suspect that the US/UK/Europe goal is a long war, drip feeding Ukraine better and better equipment, to totally disable Russia's fighting ability for decades to come. We have seen huge increases in military spending within these "allied" nations; basically, they are giving Ukraine some average old stuff, and some decent relatively new stuff, but very little top end equipment - all the time, upping their own new equipment due to replacing/upgrading their older and depleted military stocks. It took a while, but US/other military production has massively increased and continues to grow. Of course the military complex loves this. Less money for education, healthcare, etc, but more money for the military - all due to Putin's stupidity; he is being done like a kipper.

    Clearly, Russia has nukes (they won't use them). Russia has some good systems like the s300/s400 anti-missile systems which are effective, but they are getting depleted all the time. The Russian tanks do some damage, but ultimately the (let's say as a guestimate) 3,000 or so they have left and can bring into service are really just acting as artillery pieces because cheap (not so the javelin, but many very cheap Ukrainian, German, Swedish, other) anti-tank missiles will destroy them all (never mind the artillery and mines).

    This is a perfect war for the west:

    1) Russia loses a long and painful war ending in a severely weakened army/navy/airforce. Likely a regime change in Russia - for better/worse, we don't know.
    2) Ukraine becomes an EU/NATO country (might take a couple of years but will now happen).
    3) US/UK/European/other old military equipment is used up to be replaced with new, better equipment; manufacturing and spending is ramped up.

    The current Ukraine counteroffensive needs to deal with the s300/s400 missile systems, Russian airforce air to ground missiles and Russian logistics - they know this and thus I expect good advancement in these areas (we have already seen drones/missiles which can fake their signature thus triggering s300/s400 missile systems - they can then be directly located and attacked by stormshadows, Himars (with the longer range missiles) and various other systems that Ukraine now has.

    Russia might keep Crimea? Russia might keep perhaps 10 to 20% of their current land gains (I'm thinking in the heavily ethnic-Russian areas). But they are losing the war, have no possible route forward to victory and will have a very poor rest of 2023, imho. Of course, the Russians will have some small local successes in that time, but they are f'ked. WW2 tactics by one country do not beat modern warfare tactics from US/UK/Europe/other. (&, some Iranian drones, won't change the war in their favour...)
    Cycling should be banned!!!

  25. #25
    Heading down to Dino's
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    31,864

    Ukraine blames Russia for blowing up critical dam

    Kherson residents are evacuating as water levels rise. Here's what we know about the destroyed dam


    A major dam and hydro-electric power plant in Russian-occupied southern Ukraine was destroyed early Tuesday, prompting mass evacuations and fears for large-scale devastation as Ukraine accused Moscow’s forces of committing an act of “ecocide.”

    Residents downstream from the Nova Kakhova dam on the Dnipro River in Kherson were told to “do everything you can to save your life,” according to the head of Ukraine’s Kherson regional military administration, as video showed a deluge of water gushing from a huge breach in the dam.

    Here's what we know:


    • What happened: According to Ukraine's military intelligence, the dam was blown up by Russian forces "in a panic." Two videos posted to social media and geolocated by CNN showed the destroyed dam wall and fast-moving torrents of water flowing out into the river. Multiple buildings at the entrance to the dam were also heavily damaged. The Russian-installed mayor of Nova Kakhovka initially denied the dam had collapsed, but then said it was struck in a "serious terrorist attack," before he later confirmed repairing it "is not possible now."
    • Major infrastructure: The critical dam spanned the Dnipro River, a major waterway running through southeastern Ukraine. There are multiple towns and cities downstream, including Kherson, a city of some 300,000 people before Moscow’s invasion of its neighbor.
    • Evacuations ongoing: In a video statement posted on Telegram, Oleksandr Prokudin, the Ukraine-appointed head of the Kherson regional military administration, said the water "will reach critical level" in a matter of hours. Prokudin said evacuations in the “area of danger” around the dam had started and urged citizens: "Leave the dangerous areas immediately."
    • Ukraine blames Russia: Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, said the dam’s destruction would “create obstacles" for Ukrainian offensives. “This once again confirms that the Kremlin is not thinking strategically, but rather in terms of short-term situational advantages. But the consequences are already catastrophic,” he told CNN.
    • Downplayed threat: Andrey Alekseenko, another Russian-installed Kherson official, played down the threat, however. "There is no threat to people’s lives," Alekseenko said, adding that Ministry of Emergency Situation staff are in control of water levels in the Dnipro River. “If necessary, we are ready to evacuate the residents of embankment villages, buses are prepared,” Alekseenko added.
    • Ecological impact: Ukraine's Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said the destroyed dam "threatens an environmental disaster" for the south of Ukraine, while another top Ukrainian official called the destruction "ecocide."
    • EU condemnation: European Council President Charles Michel appeared to blame Russia. “Shocked by the unprecedented attack of the Nova Kakhovka dam,” he said on Twitter. “The destruction of civilian infrastructure clearly qualifies as a war crime — and we will hold Russia and its proxies accountable.”
    • Nuclear watch: The International Atomic Energy Agency said its experts are "closely monitoring the situation" and there is "no immediate nuclear safety risk" at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which lies upstream from the destroyed dam and is also under Russian control.


    https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news...-23/index.html

Page 135 of 161 FirstFirst ... 3585125127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143145 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •