^The offer to all was made years ago, more an more countries are recognising an alternative to the dead empire north of Mexico.
^The offer to all was made years ago, more an more countries are recognising an alternative to the dead empire north of Mexico.
China to grant 5G commercial-use licenses
Photo taken on June 3, 2019 shows a 5G device made by Huawei in Beijing, capital of China. China will soon grant 5G licenses for commercial use, the country's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said Monday. (Xinhua/Jin Liangkuai)
BEIJING, June 3 (Xinhua) -- China will soon grant 5G licenses for commercial use, the country's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said Monday.
China's 5G industry has built a competitive edge by combining independent innovation and open cooperation, the MIIT said, adding that 5G standards are unified international standards jointly established by global industry players and China now owns more than 30 percent of the standard essential patents for the technology.
Foreign enterprises including Nokia, Ericsson, Qualcomm and Intel have been deeply involved in the experiment of the technologies, and China's 5G is ready for commercial use thanks to the joint efforts from various parties, according to the MIIT.
China, as always, welcomes enterprises at home and abroad to actively participate in the building, application and promotion of its 5G network and share the sector's development dividends, the MIIT said.
China to grant 5G commercial-use licenses - Xinhua | English.news.cn
Brazil will not bar Huawei from 5G network: vice president
BRASILIA (Reuters) - Brazilian Vice President Hamilton Mourao on Friday told journalists that the government will not exclude Chinese telecom company Huawei Technologies Co from operating a fifth-generation (5G) mobile telecoms network in Latin America’s largest economy.
The United States has asked countries to reject Huawei technology in the development of new mobile phone networks, arguing that it could be vulnerable to Chinese eavesdropping. Huawei denies its equipment is a security risk.
U.S. President Donald Trump raised the issue with Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro during a White House visit in March.
But Mourao, who met with Huawei Chief Executive Ren Zhengfei on a trip to China last month, said Brazil has no plans to bar Huawei when it launches its 5G network next year.
Huawei has already been locked out of the U.S. market. Australia and New Zealand also blocked it from building 5G networks. Japan’s government said last year it will ban government purchases of equipment from the Chinese company.
Mourao told Valor Economico newspaper that there was no distrust of the Chinese company within the Brazilian government and Brazil needs the telecom technology it has to offer.
Wireless carrier TIM Participacoes SA announced this month that it was using Huawei technology to conduct 5G network tests in southern Brazil.
Huawei also relaunched its smartphone business in Brazil recently after a false start in 2014, and now plans to manufacture phones in the country.
The company said on Friday that it is taking the lead in the global 5G market and has secured 46 commercial contracts in 30 countries."
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-brazil/brazil-will-not-bar-huawei-from-5g-network-vice-president-idUSKCN1T82BJ?il=0
Brazilian regime change No. 2/3/4..... or a mysterious helicopter crash unfortunately causing the death of it's Vice President?
Europe's 5G to cost $62 billion more if Chinese vendors banned: telcos
"PARIS (Reuters) - A ban on buying telecoms equipment from Chinese firms would add about 55 billion euros ($62 billion) to the cost of 5G networks in Europe and delay the technology by about 18 months, according to an industry analysis seen by Reuters.
The United States added Huawei Technologies, the world’s biggest telecoms equipment maker, to a trade blacklist in May, prompting global tech giants to cut ties with the Chinese company and putting pressure on European countries to follow suit.
Washington alleges Huawei’s equipment can be used by Beijing for spying, something the company has repeatedly denied.
The move by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration comes as telecoms operators worldwide are gearing up for the arrival of the next generation of mobile technology, or 5G, which promises ultra-fast mobile internet for those able to make the heavy investment needed in networks and equipment.
The estimate is part of a report by telecoms lobby group GSMA, which represents the interests of 750 mobile operators.
GSMA has already voiced concerns about the consequences of a full ban on Huawei, whose products are widely purchased and used by operators in Europe. Huawei is one of the key supporters of the lobby group, several industry sources said."
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-europe-gsma/europes-5g-to-cost-62-billion-more-if-chinese-vendors-banned-telcos-idUSKCN1T80Y3?il=0
One of 750 lobbyists it seems, or are the other 749 members not considered "key" by Reuter's, carefully selected to provide certain view, "industry sources"?
"Several", defined in English as "More than two but not many"
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/several
Last edited by OhOh; 08-06-2019 at 12:19 PM.
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
Unfortunately telecom operators are only interested in making money and not in the security or privacy of their customers.
So their opinion really doesn't count. That's why they have to be regulated.
"Regulations" hints at those companies being "government" controlled. Surely not in the milk and honey world of the exceptional countries.
Of course some regulations can be described as "good" for the citizens and others of course not.
Depending on the desires of the political representatives/parties commercial sponsors.
Acting U.S. Budget Chief Seeks Reprieve on Huawei Ban
Russell Vought, in letter to Pence and Congress, says U.S. companies need time to adjust to the restrictions
By Dan Strumpf
Updated June 10, 2019 2:21 a.m. ET
The White House’s acting budget chief is pushing for a delay in implementing key provisions of a law that restricts the U.S. government’s business with Huawei Technologies Co., citing the burdens on U.S. companies that use its technology.
The request was made in a letter by Russell T. Vought, the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, to Vice President Mike Pence and nine members of Congress, a copy of which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
...
TO READ THE FULL STORY
SUBSCRIBE
https://www.wsj.com/articles/acting-...n-11560108418?
As your failed example illustrates, not very well thought out/applied/enforced "regulations".
From what I've read, as I profess no expertise in Telcos, the Huawei 5G has a back door that could be exploited by the Chinese govt. The Chinese have already figured in Data theft from many countries and their military rhetoric is ramping up with their economic power. They have swallowed Tibet and have threatened Taiwan, as well as gradually diluted the Hong Kong agreement Plus their claims and aggressive stance in the South China sea, almost impinging on other countries borders and far from their own coastline, demonstrates that this totalitarian govt with no controls at all from the populace cannot be trusted. That is not to say whatever 5G system is used, that countries govt may seek to use a back door.
In the end it gets down to who would you rather have sneaking in the back door?
They have already been caught enabling backdoors on their kit, and when caught, they "fixed" it. They claimed they needed access to "configure the devices remotely".
Yeah, right, if I have a problem with my Internet it probably needs Huawei to come in and configure my modem.
The fucking chinkies have been stealing IP for years so it's odds on that all of their shit has other back doors in.
What ever the reason for the Huawei ban, it certainly is impacting it's business.
"Huawei Cuts 20-30% From Smartphone Shipment Forecast"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoff.../#1ddfd2365be8
well, it comes down to a choice:
hacked by the NSA/Pentagon or hacked by the Chinese
tough choice,
Last edited by Dragonfly; 12-06-2019 at 03:56 PM.
You may find, if interested, that most phone manufacturers are suggesting a slowdown in sales forecasts.
NSA hacking is a proven thing.
Chinese hacking by a government agency is only a "highly likely" suggestion. No proof has been presented by anybody, no court in any country has convicted any Chinese telecom company for hacking.
'arrys open port for "support/maintenance" by hardware suppliers continues to be common through out the IT industry and hence another red herring. Only western countries telecoms suppliers have been found to extract, analyse and utilise for illegal purposes the open port route.
Only in goldilocks mind has it occurred. But as in many areas of goldilocks mind he has, he is and will continue to be, proven wrong.
Or do you have any court judgements, for Chinese government hacking, to quote?
Hahahaaa the chinky sycophant bleats again.
Disgusting fucking chinkies. They should keep them at home.
Ugh! Chinese tourist urinates on floor of Airport Link train
he's a child who's only capable of thinking about the near term reaction/results/consequences.
^ As are many of the voters.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)