Thread: Julian Assange is made an Ecuadorian citizen in effort to resolve impasse

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You need to stop living in the past mate. Lots of things have happened since you last read about this case in 2010.

The alleged rape incidents took place in 2010.

The police investigation was completed in 2010.

Assange was questioned twice and released without charge in 2010.

The arrest warrant was withdrawn in 2010.

Stockholm's chief prosecutor said "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape," in 2010.

No new evidence has emerged since 2010.

The article you posted doesn't mention any new evidence?
----

You said:

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Lots of things have happened since you last read about this case in 2010.

Yes, Harry lots of things have happened since 2010, 2 World Cups, 8 summers, Trump getting elected etc

But, can you list all the new evidence against Assange in regard to these rape allegations that has come to light since 2010 ?

Originally Posted by foobar

The alleged rape incidents took place in 2010.

The police investigation was completed in 2010.

Assange was questioned twice and released without charge in 2010.

The arrest warrant was withdrawn in 2010.

Stockholm's chief prosecutor said "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape," in 2010.

No new evidence has emerged since 2010.

The article you posted doesn't mention any new evidence?
----

You said:

Yes, Harry lots of things have happened since 2010, 2 World Cups, 8 summers, Trump getting elected etc

But, can you list all the new evidence against Assange in regard to these rape allegations that has come to light since 2010 ?

It seems English is not your first language. The lead prosecutors quotes speak for themselves.

By the way, this is world news, so even if your posts are irrelevant and out of date, a link is still required.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It seems English is not your first language. The lead prosecutors quotes speak for themselves.

Nothing in that article you posted or any of the quotes you've provided suggest any new evidence has emerged since 2010 so saying the article speaks for itself just means you have nothing to back up the nonsense you post.

The allegations of both women are a matter of public record, you can find all the required information within 30 secs of googling and you yourself have called Assange a rapist dozens of times on these boards, ...so can you say in your own words which specific details of these allegations amount to rape in your view?

Please dont post links to articles you've obviously not read or can understand, I want you to articulate in your own words which specific part of these allegations amount to rape?

Originally Posted by foobar

Nothing in that article you posted or any of the quotes you've provided suggest any new evidence has emerged since 2010 so saying the article speaks for itself just means you have nothing to back up the nonsense you post.

The allegations of both women are a matter of public record, you can find all the required information within 30 secs of googling and you yourself have called Assange a rapist dozens of times on these boards, ...so can you say in your own words which specific details of these allegations amount to rape in your view?

Please dont post links to articles you've obviously not read or can understand, I want you to articulate in your own words which specific part of these allegations amount to rape?

Sorry, but which bit of this do you not understand?

This bit?

“I can conclude, based on the evidence, that probable cause for this crime still exists,” Marianne Ny, the lead prosecutor in Sweden, told reporters today.

Or this bit?

the Swedish lead prosecutors believe the investigation has been completely stymied by Assange’s continued protection by Ecuador. Ny vowed to reopen prosecution — but only if Assange shows up in Sweden before 2020, when the statue of limitations runs out on the case.

Perhaps the Lead Prosecutor on the case doesn't use unattributed Google links as the basis for her evidence?

The Lead Prosecutor is quite damning about how the rapist is trying to avoid facing justice.

So is the victim.

Why is it so hard for you to accept?

She accused him of having sex with her as she slept without using a condom, despite repeatedly having denied him unprotected sex – an act that constitutes rape under Swedish law.

<snip>

Mr Assange was questioned by an Ecuadorian prosecutor with Swedish officials present inside the embassy in November, following a bilateral agreement that ended years of legal wrangling.


Prosecutors said the interview sparked further investigations but "no further measures remaining that are possible to take in order to further the investigation".

Ms Ny said the investigation could have progressed if Mr Assange was “formally served notice of the crimes of which he is suspected”, adding: “This was a measure which was to have been conducted during the interview in London but Mr Assange refused to make it possible.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a7744741.html