The Korean Missile Crisis Thread

[Klondyke]

If it does, flatten it. (I don't care who does it, as long as someone does).

Then it won't be able to launch another.

Are you a bit fucking thick?

Unfortunately, the kind Harry's advice hadn't been adhere to when the first ever case occured..

[OhOh]

Then it won't be able to launch another.

Another what 'arry. None of the "missile tests" have been seen to blow anything up. Except themselves.

[harrybarracuda]

Another what 'arry. None of the "missile tests" have been seen to blow anything up. Except themselves.

Again, that wasn't the premise, was it?

[harrybarracuda]

Unfortunately, the kind Harry's advice hadn't been adhere to when the first ever case occured..

If you mean the first two cases, they were against a country that was at war with the world.


Did you fail the History for Idiots course?

[Klondyke]

If you mean the first two cases, they were against a country that was at war with the world.

Did you fail the History for Idiots course?

The History(not only) for Idiots was here extensively clarified few months ago, as well as the reasons for these two cases, did you miss it?

[Wilsonandson]

NORTH KOREA TELLS EUROPE TO RELAX, AS KIM'S NUCLEAR MISSILES TARGET ONLY U.S.

BY TOM O'CONNOR ON 11/8/17 AT 12:58 PM

WORLDNORTH KOREAKIM JONG UNNUCLEAR WEAPONSJENS STOLTENBERGNATOICBMDONALD TRUMPDONALD TRUMP ASIA VISIT
North Korea responded Wednesday to European concerns about being in the path of Pyongyang's potentially nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) by assuring the leader of Western military alliance NATO that such weapons were only intended for the U.S.
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg said during an interview last week with Japanese newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun that "Europe has also entered the [North Korean] missile range, and NATO member states are already in danger." North Korea's ruling party-run Rodong Shinmun newspaper countered these claims, calling Stoltenberg's remarks "false and groundless" because, although European states are indeed in North Korea's missile range, Pyongyang has no intention of pulling the trigger.
Related: Trump wants war with North Korea, but Is afraid to visit its border because of bad weather
Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now
"The DPRK's ballistic rockets are for deterring the U.S. nuclear war hysterics and ensuring peace and security on the Korean peninsula and the region. They are not for threatening Europe and the world," the commentary read, according to the official Korea Central News Agency, referring to the country's official title: the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
"It is not the DPRK alone that has ICBM in the earth. If what Stoltenberg said is true, the countries with ICBM should naturally be a threat to Europe as it is within their range," it added.


North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspects the ICBM Hwasong-14 in this undated photo released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency in Pyongyang on July 5. This year, the young leader ushered in a new era for his country by overseeing its first ICBM tests.KCNA/VIA REUTERSThe article went on to accuse Stoltenberg of potentially "trying to curry favor with the U.S. to prolong his remaining days," but promptly warned that history showed "liars do not last long." While NATO includes as many as 29 members across Europe and North America, the U.S. has been by far its greatest financial and military contributor since its establishment at the onset of the Cold War in 1949.
While NATO has traditionally poised itself for war with Russia, rapid advancements made to North Korea's military ordered by leader Kim Jong Un have placed most of the world within the trajectory of the reclusive state's arsenal. North Korea has long argued it does not seek to attack first, but has developed ballistic and nuclear weapons to discourage the U.S. from attempting to overthrow Kim's dynasty.
The U.S. and many of its allies, however, have rejected this line of thinking and demanded North Korea surrender its nuclear stockpile, a standoff that's gotten increasingly tense since President Donald Trump took on the task of handling the crisis earlier this year. Trump has taken a particularly aggressive stance toward his rival and has answered in kind to North Korea's fiery promises of destruction.


President Donald Trump delivers a speech as South Korea's National Assembly Speaker Chung Sye-kyun listens at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, November 8. Trump's bellicose stance toward North Korea has raised concern among European allies.LEE JIN-MAN/POOL/REUTERSDuring his first presidential tour of Asia, Trump was set to make a surprise visit Wednesday to the heavily fortified demilitarized zone that has formed the border between North Korea and U.S.-backed South Korea since a 1953 armistice ended a bloody three-year conflict between the neighbors. The visit was canceled because of inclement weather. During a press conference in Seoul, Trump urged Kim to "make a deal."
A spokesperson for the German Foreign Ministry implored North Korea to heed the U.S. president's advice out of concern that Trump's foreign policy had become "unpredictable," Reuters reported
.
http://www.newsweek.com/north-korea-...rget-us-705639

[Wilsonandson]

[Klondyke]

Anybody has wondered how the NK (allegedly very undeveloped country) managed such Hi-Tech equipment enabling quite a good results in the missile testing? Unlike the last UK (high dveloped country) shooting that was quite a disappointment.
Or whether they have been buying it? Then, where from?

[harrybarracuda]

The History(not only) for Idiots was here extensively clarified few months ago, as well as the reasons for these two cases, did you miss it?

If you mean you posting shit links that you don't fucking understand, probably yes.

[harrybarracuda]

Anybody has wondered how the NK (allegedly very undeveloped country) managed such Hi-Tech equipment enabling quite a good results in the missile testing? Unlike the last UK (high dveloped country) shooting that was quite a disappointment.
Or whether they have been buying it? Then, where from?

How do you know what the results are?

All they've managed to do is fire some missiles at the sea in the vague direction of Japan.

If it comes to the crunch they probably couldn't hit a cows arse with a handful of rice.

[OhOh]

The premise was simply the hypothetical that North Korea launches a nuclear weapon at someone.

You state that you are willing to go to WW3 here without any proof of the ability of DPRK to

1. Hit any intended target,
2. The ability to produce a working nuclear weapon
3. The ability to place the said nuclear bomb on an unguided missile.

How do you know what the results are?

All they've managed to do is fire some missiles at the sea in the vague direction of Japan.

If it comes to the crunch they probably couldn't hit a cows arse with a handful of rice.

Yet here you have doubts about DPRK having any ability to actually hit any target irrespective of distance or payload.

Which is it 'arry?

Should be be scared or smile at yet another politician exaggerating GREATLY.

[Klondyke]

All they've managed to do is fire some missiles at the sea in the vague direction of Japan.

That's why I mentioned that even a "high developed country" is not able to do the same (sorry for my poor Tinglish you have troubles to understand):

Theresa May Is Grilled Over U.K. Missile Test Failure
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/22/w...t-missile.html

[Klondyke]

Anybody has wondered how the NK (allegedly very undeveloped country) managed such Hi-Tech equipment enabling quite a good results in the missile testing? Unlike the last UK (high dveloped country) shooting that was quite a disappointment.
Or whether they have been buying it? Then, where from?

So, nobody has a clue, where they got the technology from?

For the start why not to look in Naomi Klein's book The Shock Doctrine:

Rumsfeld sat on the board of the aircraft manufacturer
Gulfstream and was also paid $190,000 a year as a board member of ASEA
Brown Boveri (ABB), the Swiss engineering giant that gained unwanted attention
when it was revealed to have sold nuclear technology to North Korea,
including the capacity to produce plutonium. The nuclear reactor sale
went through in 2000, and at the time Rumsfeld was the only North American
on the ABB board. He claims to have no memory of the reactor sale
coming before the board, though the company insists that "board members
were informed about the project."

[OhOh]

The Chinese are cultivating the SK's, the Russians the NK's. Unfortunatly the amristanis and Japanese are discussing yesterdays golf game.

[Klondyke]

The Chinese are cultivating the SK's, the Russians the NK's. Unfortunatly the amristanis and Japanese are discussing yesterdays golf game.

Just roll with it! Japanese PM AbJust roll with it! Japanese PM Abe ‘falls into sand bunker’ while golfing with Trump (VIDEO)
e ‘falls into sand bunker’ while golfing with Trump (VIDEO)

A round of golf between Donald Trump and Shinzo Abe has become a social media hit in Japan after a man that appeared to be the Japanese PM slipped on a patch of grass and comically rolled into a sand bunker. Luckily, the US president failed to notice the whole slip up.
The golf gaffe was caught on an aerial video at the Kasumigaseki Country Club in Kawagoe, Saitama Prefecture Sunday. The man, said to be Abe, had hit his ball out of the bunker, however, he unintentionally and hilariously ended up right back in the sand just after getting out.

[harrybarracuda]

You state that you are willing to go to WW3 here without any proof of the ability of DPRK to

1. Hit any intended target,
2. The ability to produce a working nuclear weapon
3. The ability to place the said nuclear bomb on an unguided missile.

I didn't say that at all you fucking idiot.

I said IF North Korea attacks *any* country with a nuclear weapon, then it is fine for the US (or anyone else) to turn him and his nuclear programme into glass.

Can you not fucking read?

Cast your mind back to the post to which you replied:

Originally Posted by Wilsonandson
In agreement that the U.S has the right to wipe North Korea off the map if it attacks another country?

With nukes, yes

By what authority has ameristan, or any other country, "the right to wipe North Korea off the map if it attacks another country"?

[OhOh]

It appears that DPRK have launched another rocket into the sea. The rocket reached a new high for altitude which many have siggested the DPRK now have a true ICBM.

ameristani spokeswoman Ms Haley has indicated the DPRK will be "utterly destroyed".

" US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley ratcheted up talk of war with North Korea in reaction to the isolated country's most recent intercontinental ballistic missile test, warning that Kim Jong-un’s government is on a road to ruin.


During an emergency session of the UN Security Council on Wednesday, Haley asked the members of the panel to increase the sanctions imposed on North Korea and to implement penalties established by the council earlier in the year, The Hill reported.


Haley also warned the panel that North Korea's latest missile test has brought Pyongyang and Washington “closer to war.”

“If war comes, make no mistake, the North Korean regime will be utterly destroyed,” Haley said.


“The dictator of North Korea made a choice yesterday that brings the world closer to war, not farther from it,” Ambassador Haley added."

https://www.rt.com/usa/411382-haley-north-korea-utterly-destroyed/


Meanwhile the Russian Foreign Minister has suggested that ameristan should spell it out clearly and let the ameristani leadership confirm it.

"

Commenting on the latest developments, Lavrov said it seems that the US wants North Korea to resume the tests. “The latest US action seemed to be directed towards provoking Pyongyang into taking some rash action,” he told journalists on Thursday. The foreign minister called the missile test “an adventure,” but said that Washington has apparently been trying to goad North Korean leader Kim Jong-un into it.


“The Americans should start with explaining their intentions to us all. If they are really looking for an excuse to destroy North Korea, as the US envoy to the UN said at a Security Council meeting, let them spell it out clearly and let the US leadership confirm it. Then we will decide how to react,” Lavrov said."


https://www.rt.com/news/411394-us-pr...nkorea-lavrov/

[Wilsonandson]

Published on Nov 30, 2017
New footage shows North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and military personnel overseeing the launch of its newest type of intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) which could "target the entire area of mainland United States," televised governmental broadcast on Thursday.

[Klondyke]

U.S. PROVOKED NORTH KOREA INTO FIRING MISSILE OVER JAPAN, SAYS RUSSIA
8/29/17 NEWSWEEK LLC

The U.S. and South Korea are to blame for North Korea’s latest missile launch over Japan, and further sanctions on the regime will not ameliorate the situation, Russia said Tuesday.

Anticipating more of the same to follow, Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told journalists on Tuesday that U.S. actions were pushing the regime toward more tests, not halting it, state news agency Itar-Tass reported.

“If we go by how colleagues from the U.S. and other western countries have acted in the past, then of course we can expect new steps towards tightening the sanctions, but this will not solve the problem,” Ryabkov said. “It is now obvious to everyone that the resources for influencing North Korea with sanctions have run out.”

Ryabkov referred to the joint military exercises the U.S. is currently holding with ally South Korea.

U.S. Provoked North Korea Into Firing Missile Over Japan, Says Russia

(sorry, cannot find a link to RT... )

[harrybarracuda]

Sanctions won't work because the fat little c u n t in charge would watch his people starve before he gave in.

He won't go hungry.

[OhOh]

It seems the DPRK leader has taken note of the actions of ameristan and vassals against previous countries when they gave up their defensive weapons.

Better off eating grass than being slaughterd from 10,000m.

[OhOh]

It seems the DPRK leader has taken note of the actions of ameristan and vassals against previous countries when they gave up their defensive weapons.

Better off eating grass than being slaughterd from 10,000m.

[HuangLao]

Continuously in search of a boogieman.
And those who buy into it.

[Klondyke]

"Don't provoke me", shouts a robber armed to the teeth in front of door of a poor cottager who locks his door, preparing his rifle...

[OhOh]

Allegedly the ameristanis have discovered a new use of the mouth. Talking.

Some are now urging talks with the DPRK. Others say it indicates the ameristani's big stick is now ready.

Tillerson says US willing to talk with DPRK 'without precondition' - Global Times"US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said on Tuesday that Washington is willing to begin talks with the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) "without pre-condition."

"We're ready to have the first meeting without precondition," Tillerson told a policy forum at the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank.

"Let's just meet," the top US diplomat told an audience of around 300. "We can talk about the weather if you want. We can talk about whether it's going to be a square table or a round table."

"Can we at least sit down and see each other face to face, and then we can begin to lay out a map, a road map, of what we might be willing to work towards," Tillerson said, changing the tough tone long being held by the Trump administration and suggesting some initial contacts to set the ground rules for further negotiations.

Tillerson noted that a dialogue is possible whenever Pyongyang is ready.

Tillerson's remarks came two weeks after the DPRK successfully test-fired a newly developed Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, drawing strong condemnation from the international community.

Washington and Pyongyang has been exchanging harsh rhetoric in the past months, with US President Donald Trump threatening to rain down "fire and fury" and "totally destroy" the country.

Before Tillerson's speech, the United States has insisted that negotiations should be based on the DPRK's nuclear disarmament."