Quote Originally Posted by Begbie
A fairly dumb article. 9/11 is no reason to assault a paying customer.
Absolutely.

The security issue involved is how the fuck did he manage to get back onto the plane, not why was the guy so dazed and panicked that he tried to do so.

The whole article is just totally skewed in favour of the airlines (where the daily bread comes from of course) and indicates how deep seated the problem seems to be. Basically it's saying that post 9-11 airlines can treat customers like shit, even when no security aspects are involved.