Thread: Julian Assange Wins Round 2

Originally Posted by can123

Originally Posted by OhOh

You may, if you want to be informed prior to you being unmasked as a complete tosser, look for it, it's available verbatim.

Any "evidence" in the public domain is just hearsay and gossip. I am not a complete tosser. As for the rest of your post, I recommend that you rewrite it as in its present form it is unintelligible.

You may like to read this article.
How did the UN get it so wrong on Julian Assange?| Joshua Rozenberg | Opinion | The Guardian

As for us OhOh's insults zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

^

Thank you but I have read other similar items. I believe the government is correct and the so-called UN adjudication is a load of bollocks. Harry The Fish should read your quoted item.

Originally Posted by can123

^

Thank you but I have read other similar items. I believe the government is correct and the so-called UN adjudication is a load of bollocks. Harry The Fish should read your quoted item.

Er, I think the adjudication is a load of bollocks, and if you pulled your head out of your arse you would have seen where I said it's a waste of money.

But if you read the rest of the story, you'd also realise that the continuance of the charges, which were ready to be dropped, stinks of political interference.

However, he's only got another four years and they can't get him on the remaining "rape" charge anyway.

But I've also said they'll get him on something else.

They want this boy in a supermax and I don't think they give a shit how they do it.

Once he's in the US he can forget yuman rights.