It's hard to believe that he was not taking part in child sex trafficking which was clearly going on at Epstien's house during the time Andrew stayed there.
on a similar theme, years before jimmy savile was exposed as an abusive pedophile, the respected journalist louis theroux lived at saviles apartment for a month whilst filming a documentary about saviles extrovert personality and lifestyle. when the revelations about savile came out, theroux was amazed that during the month he spent at his apartment he had no suspicion whatsover of saviles perversions.

epstein lived in massive mansions and rambling apartments, and it is quite possible that someone staying there would be completely unaware of the darker aspects of his lifestyle. i believe that the visit in question took place before epsteins conviction for underage sex.

epsteins procurer in chief, ghislaine maxwell, probably has answers to all the questions being asked at the moment, and unsurprisingly she has gone awol.

if andrew raped the girl in question then a crime has been committed, if there was sex and it was consensual, then no crime has been committed, although ethically and morally boundaries may well have been crossed in that a member of the royal family has ventured "below stairs" as it were to consummate his lust "a la droit du seigneur"

its a messy and shameful business no doubt, but as to whether criminality is involved in andrews behaviour? i doubt it.

his daughters must be very proud of him.