Thread: When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

Originally Posted by Neverna

When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

A woman being seen to be too free with her sexual favours is not being a strong positive role model; she is being a slag.

Having sex with a co-contestant on a reality TV show is advertising her promiscuity and is poor judgement.

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

If a woman is seen to be too free with her sexual favours society will shun her for disrupting the natural order.

Originally Posted by lob

the pic in post one, she looks like a scaffolders ho

Or a brickie's hod. RIP DD.

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

No it hasn't it just likes to think it has.

Originally Posted by Cujo

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

No it hasn't it just likes to think it has.

That's interesting. Perhaps some parts of Britain (or some people) have and some parts (or people) haven't. A divided society. Or perhaps individuals want to believe one thing but inwardly their emotions say something else.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Looper

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

I don't know about in Australia, but in Britain, society has evolved beyond that.

Long term sustainable solutions to society's perceived ills (such as sexual discrimination against women) need to take into account human nature. The better we understand why we have tendencies to act the way we do the better we can establish social and legal frameworks to manage behaviour and set expectations correctly. There is nothing inherently 'good' about trying to deny human nature. A woman who is too free with her sexual favours will likely always be seen as morally wanting due to the evolved nature of the sexual game. Her harshest critics in this context are likely to be other women.

Originally Posted by Maanaam

If women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours, why are so many of them not? And why is the oldest profession in the world that of a woman who sells her favours?

Prostitution being a female occupation rather than a male occupation is a clear indicator that what I am saying about the sexual equation is correct. Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexuality since it represents a constrained reproductive resource. Men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex. That is why the economic equation works for prostitution.

Originally Posted by Looper

Originally Posted by Maanaam

If women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours, why are so many of them not? And why is the oldest profession in the world that of a woman who sells her favours?

.... Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexuality since it represents a constrained reproductive resource. Men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex. ....

So, all the women I've had sex with without marrying or paying them are less evolved?
Men (gay or not) who don't chase women are less evolved?

Originally Posted by Looper

Originally Posted by Neverna

When is a strong, positive female not a strong positive female?

A woman being seen to be too free with her sexual favours is not being a strong positive role model; she is being a slag.

Having sex with a co-contestant on a reality TV show is advertising her promiscuity and is poor judgement.

Women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours and men are evolved to compete with each other and chase women for sex.

If a woman is seen to be too free with her sexual favours society will shun her for disrupting the natural order.

Originally Posted by lob

the pic in post one, she looks like a scaffolders ho

Or a brickie's hod. RIP DD.

Wow, just like your views on rape, you are showing your out-dated attitude: "Natural order"....Woman should be chaste, demure, virginal, barefoot and in the kitchen.

If women are evolved to be guarded with their sexual favours, why are so many of them not? And why is the oldest profession in the world that of a woman who sells her favours?

A Trump voter, clearly.