Healthy Score 20 plus partners

**david44** · 29-10-2014, 02:47 PM

I may need to build a bigger bed.I am sure this is great news for Siam where traditional modesty may give we way to a bit of the other.

Sex with more than 20 women helps reduce prostate cancer: study

**yankee99** · 29-10-2014, 03:07 PM

Confuses me but im not French Canadian. What is the difference in screwing 20 different women 50 times (in regards to the study) or one women 1000 times? Seems ejaculating is ejaculating...

**boloa** · 29-10-2014, 03:10 PM

Does wanking count ???

**Davis Knowlton** · 29-10-2014, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by yankee99

Confuses me but im not French Canadian. What is the difference in screwing 20 different women 50 times (in regards to the study) or one women 1000 times? Seems ejaculating is ejaculating...

There you go....trying to apply common sense to a survey. A recent survey revealed that 97.6 percent of people who believed the results of surveys were retards.

**yankee99** · 29-10-2014, 03:12 PM

Originally Posted by boloa

Does wanking count ???

Wanking should at least count for 50% and no risk of disease.

**yankee99** · 29-10-2014, 03:13 PM

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

Originally Posted by yankee99

Confuses me but im not French Canadian. What is the difference in screwing 20 different women 50 times (in regards to the study) or one women 1000 times? Seems ejaculating is ejaculating...

There you go....trying to apply common sense to a survey. A recent survey revealed that 97.6 percent of people who believed the results of surveys were retards.

And the other 2.4% were? ;")

**Hans Mann** · 29-10-2014, 03:17 PM

Can I claim medical insurance for this treatment?

**Looper** · 29-10-2014, 04:16 PM

So good for lechers but bad for back door bandits but in the article photo he is back-dooring the woman so I am confused if this will be good or bad for him.

Maybe it will stop her from getting prostate cancer.

**david44** · 30-10-2014, 11:28 AM

Lewdbrication is key

**david44** · 30-10-2014, 11:29 AM

...in conjunction with the dept of health in the small print....

**ltnt** · 30-10-2014, 03:24 PM

Good news for a change...Thanks David, I'm doing my part.

Perhaps a poll should be taken?

**pseudolus** · 30-10-2014, 04:10 PM

But for homosexuals who have had sex with at least 20 men and virgins, the risk of being diagnosed is doubled, the researchers from the University of Montreal have found.

What a load of nonsense this study is, of course.

Avoir plusieurs femmes dans sa vie réduirait le risque de cancer de la prostate | INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier

Did they ask the gays if they were givers or receivers? Surely this is needed to be known if they are going to say "well, cock bashing prostate; that ain't good".

What about the virgins? Surely having a tug has the same effect as popping thew cherry?

Also, they reckon STDs might have something to do with it, yet in the actual report say "there is no link at all between STDs and Prostate cancer".

Daft article. Does shagging 1000 + birds mean you are uber protected then? What about if you shagged 20 different birds once; just as protected as shagging 20 birds 10 times? What about one bird 100 times?

A complete load of nonsense.

**david44** · 31-10-2014, 11:28 AM

Agreed but still found it amusing

**9999** · 31-10-2014, 03:26 PM

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

A recent survey revealed that 97.6 percent of people who believed the results of surveys were retards.

They backfit random stats to get a story. Kind of like the shyster trying to sell you a horse racing system.

**kingwilly** · 31-10-2014, 04:20 PM

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Did they ask the gays if they were givers or receivers? Surely this is needed to be known if they are going to say "well, cock bashing prostate; that ain't good".

Not all gay blokes are into anal sex.

**Looper** · 31-10-2014, 04:28 PM

If the test was designed properly by a statistician there would be a control group of guys getting back-doored by girls with strap-ons. The guys would have to be blind-folded so they didn't know if it was a girl and the girls would also have to be blind-folded which is the double-blind requirement for properly constructed clinical studies.

**Norton** · 31-10-2014, 04:47 PM

Originally Posted by yankee99

And the other 2.4% were? ;")

If male, likely to get prostate cancer. Not likely for females.

**ltnt** · 31-10-2014, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by Norton

Not likely for females.

They get off with breast cancer I suppose...Uh!

Thread: Healthy Score 20 plus partners

Thread Tools

Display

Healthy Score 20 plus partners

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions