Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    POTUS HOCUS
    david44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    12-10-2019 @ 11:14 AM
    Location
    Inner Wrongholia
    Posts
    13,668

    Healthy Score 20 plus partners

    I may need to build a bigger bed.I am sure this is great news for Siam where traditional modesty may give we way to a bit of the other.


    Sex with more than 20 women helps reduce prostate cancer: study

  2. #2
    Member
    yankee99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    20-11-2019 @ 05:55 PM
    Location
    Pattaya, Thailand
    Posts
    257
    Confuses me but im not French Canadian. What is the difference in screwing 20 different women 50 times (in regards to the study) or one women 1000 times? Seems ejaculating is ejaculating...

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    boloa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Surin
    Posts
    3,878
    Does wanking count ???

  4. #4
    Philippine Expat Davis Knowlton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    17,880
    Quote Originally Posted by yankee99 View Post
    Confuses me but im not French Canadian. What is the difference in screwing 20 different women 50 times (in regards to the study) or one women 1000 times? Seems ejaculating is ejaculating...

    There you go....trying to apply common sense to a survey. A recent survey revealed that 97.6 percent of people who believed the results of surveys were retards.

  5. #5
    Member
    yankee99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    20-11-2019 @ 05:55 PM
    Location
    Pattaya, Thailand
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by boloa View Post
    Does wanking count ???
    Wanking should at least count for 50% and no risk of disease.

  6. #6
    Member
    yankee99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    20-11-2019 @ 05:55 PM
    Location
    Pattaya, Thailand
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by yankee99 View Post
    Confuses me but im not French Canadian. What is the difference in screwing 20 different women 50 times (in regards to the study) or one women 1000 times? Seems ejaculating is ejaculating...

    There you go....trying to apply common sense to a survey. A recent survey revealed that 97.6 percent of people who believed the results of surveys were retards.
    And the other 2.4% were? ;")

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    Hans Mann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Online
    01-07-2016 @ 05:52 AM
    Location
    Land of Laughs
    Posts
    5,764
    Can I claim medical insurance for this treatment?

  8. #8
    How Dare You!!
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:51 AM
    Posts
    12,133
    So good for lechers but bad for back door bandits but in the article photo he is back-dooring the woman so I am confused if this will be good or bad for him.



    Maybe it will stop her from getting prostate cancer.

  9. #9
    POTUS HOCUS
    david44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    12-10-2019 @ 11:14 AM
    Location
    Inner Wrongholia
    Posts
    13,668
    Lewdbrication is key


  10. #10
    POTUS HOCUS
    david44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    12-10-2019 @ 11:14 AM
    Location
    Inner Wrongholia
    Posts
    13,668
    ...in conjunction with the dept of health in the small print....

  11. #11
    Banned

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Online
    14-08-2015 @ 05:39 PM
    Location
    Ex-Pat Refugee in Thailand
    Posts
    9,579
    Good news for a change...Thanks David, I'm doing my part.

    Perhaps a poll should be taken?

  12. #12
    Thailand Expat
    pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    14-10-2019 @ 04:04 AM
    Location
    On the range
    Posts
    17,613
    But for homosexuals who have had sex with at least 20 men and virgins, the risk of being diagnosed is doubled, the researchers from the University of Montreal have found.
    What a load of nonsense this study is, of course.

    Avoir plusieurs femmes dans sa vie réduirait le risque de cancer de la prostate | INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier

    Did they ask the gays if they were givers or receivers? Surely this is needed to be known if they are going to say "well, cock bashing prostate; that ain't good".

    What about the virgins? Surely having a tug has the same effect as popping thew cherry?

    Also, they reckon STDs might have something to do with it, yet in the actual report say "there is no link at all between STDs and Prostate cancer".

    Daft article. Does shagging 1000 + birds mean you are uber protected then? What about if you shagged 20 different birds once; just as protected as shagging 20 birds 10 times? What about one bird 100 times?

    A complete load of nonsense.
    Originally Posted by bsnub "No wonder I drive a tesla"

  13. #13
    POTUS HOCUS
    david44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    12-10-2019 @ 11:14 AM
    Location
    Inner Wrongholia
    Posts
    13,668
    Agreed but still found it amusing

  14. #14
    Thailand Expat
    9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last Online
    31-05-2018 @ 07:54 PM
    Location
    Hating but living in the 3rd world
    Posts
    5,511
    Quote Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton
    A recent survey revealed that 97.6 percent of people who believed the results of surveys were retards.
    They backfit random stats to get a story. Kind of like the shyster trying to sell you a horse racing system.

  15. #15
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    60,017
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Did they ask the gays if they were givers or receivers? Surely this is needed to be known if they are going to say "well, cock bashing prostate; that ain't good".
    Not all gay blokes are into anal sex.

  16. #16
    How Dare You!!
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:51 AM
    Posts
    12,133
    If the test was designed properly by a statistician there would be a control group of guys getting back-doored by girls with strap-ons. The guys would have to be blind-folded so they didn't know if it was a girl and the girls would also have to be blind-folded which is the double-blind requirement for properly constructed clinical studies.

  17. #17
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    30,499
    Quote Originally Posted by yankee99
    And the other 2.4% were? ;")
    If male, likely to get prostate cancer. Not likely for females.

  18. #18
    Banned

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Online
    14-08-2015 @ 05:39 PM
    Location
    Ex-Pat Refugee in Thailand
    Posts
    9,579
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton
    Not likely for females.
    They get off with breast cancer I suppose...Uh!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •