Thread: Queens of the jungle : Homosexuality in the animal kingdom explained

Originally Posted by spudge

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

In addition to penguins, he says, koalas, flamingos, giraffes, monkeys, killer whales and dolphins are on list.

Was anybody really surprised about the flamingos? C'mon, they are pink FFS!

Cameleons have the ability to change colour, though.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by DJ Pat

Me and my cousin often dance beard to beard in the living room

You drunk again pat? Been sniffing glue?

I need a king sized tin of evo-stick glue whenever my male cousin is around, he's got a big beard, and in my attempt to put him off, also grow a big beard, but he always manages to seduce me, he has a thing about beards.

Since this ordeal I now suffer from pogonophobia.


http://www.fearofstuff.com/humans/fear-of-beards/

Originally Posted by Beard website

Symptoms of fear of beards include revulsion, an ability to be around people who wear full beards, and issues with hygiene. Those with Pogonophobia may shun bearded people in the belief that they are unclean. They may also be put off by the religious beliefs that cause some men to adopt full beards and moustaches.

Personally, I do not feel threatened by homosexuals. If they want to do "sick" things to each other, let em at it.

What I do feel is a "natural" disgust at what they do, but as I stated above, as adults, what they do is their business.

I do, however, take exception at the term, "homophobic". That is one more PC-evolved term that attempts to label anyone who expresses their digust of homosexuals acts, as someone who is "sick" or has something wrong with them.

Just as homosexuals have a right to do disgusting things to each other, so do non-homosexuals have a right to express their opinions of such behavior.

Now society, seems to be treating them as "victims" that need special protection from the rest of the world.

Pedophiles will probably be the next group that is given this type of protection, since the primary difference (since most pedophiles are male and most child victims are male), is that homosexuals like big c_ocks and old arse-hoes, while pedophiles prefere small c_ocks and young arse-hoes. Both groups seem to have unnatural urges that they can't seem to control.

Just my opinon of course.


RickThai

Originally Posted by tsicar

.
..doesn't mean that everybody who hates paedophiles or say, dwarfs or niggers or even dolphins or such, and campaigns against them is a closet one, now does it?

andy's argument would have it that someone who hates spiders is actually a closet spider himself, who is just too shy to come out of the web.

Well said. I don't like liver, but I'm not one!

RickThai

Well done Rickthai and tsicar you've both managed to bring your disgust and self loathing to new lows.

Originally Posted by RickThai

Pedophiles will probably be the next group that is given this type of protection, since the primary difference (since most pedophiles are male and most child victims are male), is that homosexuals like big c_ocks and old arse-hoes, while pedophiles prefere small c_ocks and young arse-hoes. Both groups seem to have unnatural urges that they can't seem to control.

It might be worth your while to change the flavour of your Kool-Aid.

Now just imagine this song playing in the backround while viewing this thread:

Love the kind you clean up with a mop and bucket
With the lost catagrins of Egypt
Only god knows where we stuck it
....
Please turn me on I'm Mr. Coffee with an automatic drip
....
And then we'll do it doggie-style
So we can watch x-files

you mean this one ?

Originally Posted by tsicar

andy's argument would have it that someone who hates spiders is actually a closet spider himself, who is just too shy to come out of the web.

Originally Posted by tsicar

makes perfect sense to me

no, but that is certainly a proven possibility

even with your own argument

Originally Posted by tsicar

pretty good cover: if you were a paedophile but spoke out vehemently against them, you would have less chance of being discovered. if you were a jew in germany during the second world war and asked by a member of the ss what you thunk about jews, what would you say?

but no, obviously not all, or even the majority

Originally Posted by Rural Surin

Originally Posted by RickThai

Pedophiles will probably be the next group that is given this type of protection, since the primary difference (since most pedophiles are male and most child victims are male), is that homosexuals like big c_ocks and old arse-hoes, while pedophiles prefere small c_ocks and young arse-hoes. Both groups seem to have unnatural urges that they can't seem to control.

It might be worth your while to change the flavour of your Kool-Aid.

Not sure what you mean, but I assume you think my "facts" are askew? I know homosexuals try to keep their distance from pedophiles, but I think the similiarities I mentioned are real.

That is not to say, that all homosexuals are pedophiles or all pedophiles started out as homosexuls, but an "objective" look at the similarities do bring up many things in common.

Until PC'd, homosexuality was considered a "mental illness" by the American Psychiatric Society for decades, thus I use the term "sick", because I reallydo believe that something is "not right" in their bodies. Such as the case with pedophiles, something is "broke" within them.

Adult homosexuals of course, should be allowed to marry and "diddle" each other to their hearts content. Because that really is their business.

But many people, because of religious or just "gut" feelings of "ugh", also should have a right to express their honest feelings about such matters without being attacked as "bigots", etc.

I would imagine, that "deep inside" themselves, homosexuals also know that something is not quite right with their desires, but they cover it up by using terms like "gay".

As for myself, I have no delusions about my own qualities, good or bad. And I certainly don't have any issues of "self disgust" as one poster (probably a homosexual) has indicated.

Enjoy your life.

RickThai

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Well done Rickthai and tsicar you've both managed to bring your disgust and self loathing to new lows.

Would you deny them the right to feel disgusted?
Are you a bigotophobe? Do you discriminate against those you perceive as bigots?
Shame on you.

A group of men whose basic sex drive evolves around sperm and feces is well-deserving of any negative crititisms in my book.

In truth, I feel sorry for them, and am truly glad that I did not turn out that way.

If this is offensive to anyone, then so be it.

RickThai

Originally Posted by RickThai

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Well done Rickthai and tsicar you've both managed to bring your disgust and self loathing to new lows.

Would you deny them the right to feel disgusted?
Are you a bigotophobe? Do you discriminate against those you perceive as bigots?
Shame on you.

A group of men whose basic sex drive evolves around sperm and feces is well-deserving of any negative crititisms in my book.

In truth, I feel sorry for them, and am truly glad that I did not turn out that way.

If this is offensive to anyone, then so be it.
RickThai

I think you missed my point, which was you should be perfectly entitled to your point of view without being labeled 'bigot' or ' homophobe' just because someone disagrees.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Homosexuality seems occur in a rather small percentage of the population. Is it natural? For them it is, but for society at large, no it is not natural.
What I find most disturbing in this sort of discussion is how the side who panders to homosexuals are the ones so quick to label someone a homophobe in an attempt to silence the discussion. Freedom of speech, intelligent debate regarding homosexuality is simply out of the question. Talk about some closet fascists lurking about.

Thanks to monkeyfuck willy to shine spotlight on our resident closet homo/fascists.

What's a homo-fascist, Earl?

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by RickThai

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by Sir Wilson

Well done Rickthai and tsicar you've both managed to bring your disgust and self loathing to new lows.

Would you deny them the right to feel disgusted?
Are you a bigotophobe? Do you discriminate against those you perceive as bigots?
Shame on you.

A group of men whose basic sex drive evolves around sperm and feces is well-deserving of any negative crititisms in my book.

In truth, I feel sorry for them, and am truly glad that I did not turn out that way.

If this is offensive to anyone, then so be it.
RickThai

I think you missed my point, which was you should be perfectly entitled to your point of view without being labeled 'bigot' or ' homophobe' just because someone disagrees.

Your are right. I did miss the point. My mistake (and my apologies).

To anyone who is a homosexual:

I truly support your rights to marriage and whatever legal benifits hetro couples are entitled to.

If I have hurt your feelings (or earned your scorn) by my opinions, then I do offer my regrets to your response, however my expressions were honest.

I think many people feel repulsed by the thought of a man performing oral and anal sex on another man. I believe that is a "normal" response (i.e. one instinctually inherit in most people). Most are too polite, or too worried about being considered a "bigot", "homo-phobic", or whatever PC term is applied to such people who choose honesty over PC'ness.

When one actually considers all the "nasty" diseases associated with that behavior; parasites, HIV, etc. it's no wonder there is such an instinctual aversion to it (and by association, the people who practise it).

I would think by now, most homosexuals would be used to it (even though you might not like it). Nature-of-the-beast, if you get my drift.

Let's face it, the anus was evolved to rid the body of waste material (feces), not as a receptable for a man's penis. That's why so many homosexual men suffer from infected hemhroids, weakened sphincter muscles, parisites, etc.

Maybe nature (god or evolution) is the ultimate "homo-phobe"?

As far as pedophiles, I do believe that it is another branch on the same tree as to whatever "causes" homosexuality (genetical, or learned). That is just an opinion of course, based upon my observations.

Cheers to all (even the homosexuals and their apologists).

RickThai

Don't knock anal sex. It's quite sweeter on females.

They tend to clean their nether regions a bit better, are a bit more concious of the hygeine associated with such an act. I've never experienced any ''follow thru'' that many gay blokes I know 'joke' about. In fact any faecal matter would be a sure sign of poor hygeine practise, no wonder many gay blokes experience some of the parasytic atrocities associated.

In Thailand, the use of bum spray hoses is very hygeinic and a godsend. I still can't believe that most in the west wipe their shitty arses with dry tissue, thus rubbing it into their skin pores around the anal entrance.

I must admit there was an occasion when I was rather large for this particular girls arsehole, and when I withdrew I had an equal mixture of KY, sperm, blood and a small amount of shit on my helmet. A japs-eye clearing piss and a shower soon cleared it.

Originally Posted by RickThai

Originally Posted by Rural Surin

Originally Posted by RickThai

Pedophiles will probably be the next group that is given this type of protection, since the primary difference (since most pedophiles are male and most child victims are male), is that homosexuals like big c_ocks and old arse-hoes, while pedophiles prefere small c_ocks and young arse-hoes. Both groups seem to have unnatural urges that they can't seem to control.

It might be worth your while to change the flavour of your Kool-Aid.

Not sure what you mean, but I assume you think my "facts" are askew? I know homosexuals try to keep their distance from pedophiles, but I think the similiarities I mentioned are real.

That is not to say, that all homosexuals are pedophiles or all pedophiles started out as homosexuls, but an "objective" look at the similarities do bring up many things in common.

Until PC'd, homosexuality was considered a "mental illness" by the American Psychiatric Society for decades, thus I use the term "sick", because I reallydo believe that something is "not right" in their bodies. Such as the case with pedophiles, something is "broke" within them.

Adult homosexuals of course, should be allowed to marry and "diddle" each other to their hearts content. Because that really is their business.

But many people, because of religious or just "gut" feelings of "ugh", also should have a right to express their honest feelings about such matters without being attacked as "bigots", etc.

I would imagine, that "deep inside" themselves, homosexuals also know that something is not quite right with their desires, but they cover it up by using terms like "gay".

As for myself, I have no delusions about my own qualities, good or bad. And I certainly don't have any issues of "self disgust" as one poster (probably a homosexual) has indicated.

Enjoy your life.

RickThai

I agree.

Pedophiles are next on the list for the PC crowd like Dr andy to adore.