Lower TV ratings this year? Wonder why.Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Wow. One less receiver to worry about. No need to cover them on the final play or whatever.
It was actually not an illegal. If the QB is outside the pocket, the defender can make contact with the receiver, despite the fact that he was past 5 yards. However the nature of the hit, (he was defenseless, IMO) is what bothers me. It was a cheap shot, from a dirty player, on a dirty team, coached by a dirty coach.Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Was Taylor out of the pocket at that point? That looks like the beginning of the play but hard to tell...I know he was flushed pretty early in the play but that looks pretty early as also.
That hit on the punter was defo a cheap shot though. No one tries to block a kick like that, he would have tried to get as much of his body in front of the ball as possible. He flew into the guys legs with his back
Absolutely.Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
They really need to expand coaches challenges, to allow reviews of these kinds of situations. Would have been really easy to call up the video in this case and see the mistake.
how about this one?
sherman gets torched routinely now. hes not a top CB anymore. he must resort to the thuggish tactics seen above and yap his mouth in order to remain relevant.
Last edited by samsara; 09-11-2016 at 04:47 PM.
Trent Dilfer, Matt Hasselbeck, Randy Moss, Steve Young and Charles Woodson all disagree with you. After the game they all were asked if it was a cheap shot and everyone of them said no that Sherman was going after the ball.Originally Posted by redhaze
Maybe you would prefer to watch flag football instead? Powder puff football maybe?
From Sherman;
Sherman disputed that the play was "dirty," telling reporters after the game, "I'm a pro. I've been in this league long enough. I know how hard it is to play. When you go for a block, that's what you do. You go for a block. Even if I was offsides, you still stop the play. You're not going to let him just kick the ball freely and let him have a free play. He could have made the decision not to kick the ball. He saw the flag before I did. He has a better vantage point than any of us."
Bottom line Carpenter should never of tried to kick that ball.
You say some of the stupidest things. Maybe you should follow a sport that you know something about because it sure is not football.Originally Posted by samsara
Last edited by bsnub; 09-11-2016 at 07:30 AM.
Carpenter should not have tried to kick the ball lol. Richard Sherman, is that you?
^ Heh well the commentators I listed above after the game agreed.
Also !!AN FYI TO THOSE OF YOU POSTING VIDEOS!! DELETE THE HTTPS FROM THE ADDRESS OTHERWISE IT BORKS THE POST LIKE THE ONE ABOVE.
They also said it was roughing the kicker btw, so pick and choose what fits your narrative. I think with Russel Wilson literally walking towards them to be interviewed at that moment they just aren't going to go there. But the film doesn't lie, the guy was headed straight for the legs. Never seen a guy try to block a kick in that way ever
Kickers always kick the ball in those situations by the way. They take it as just a practice shot or whatever even when the whistle has clearly blown. That's very common. It's on Sherman, not the kicker, to hold up on that play. That's well-established precedent
Originally Posted by redhaze
Sure doesn't going for the ball.Originally Posted by redhaze
Its on the holder to yank the ball and take off not the kicker.Originally Posted by redhaze
No its not now you are just making shit up.Originally Posted by redhaze
Last edited by bsnub; 09-11-2016 at 08:19 AM.
No, it actually happens numerous times each week where the whistle blows and the kicker just follows through with the kick anyways to take a practice shot. Even Sherman himself said that kicker probably just kicked it because he wanted to. Well yeah, exactly it happens every single week. The difference is no one goes in for a potential career-ending shot. That's on Sherman. Don't blast other posters for not knowing things about football and then show your own stupidity.
I am showing anything but stupidity. The kicker could clearly see Sherman coming at him and did nothing. If that was me there is no way I would have tried to kick that ball it was just plain stupid and like I said everyone of those announcers agreed and said that they would have done the same thing. Charles Woodson said he would have gone for the ball just like Sherman did. But I guess he is stupid and you know more about football then him.Originally Posted by redhaze
Give me a break.
Originally Posted by bsnubI agreeOriginally Posted by bsnub
HE STILL ROUGHED THE KICKER, FFS!Originally Posted by bsnub
Now I know you're totally clueless. Worst case is it was "running into the kicker".Originally Posted by beachbound
Two totally different penalties.
bsnub plays a good troll. even the most devout fan isnt this blind to his teams foibles.
nope. youre utterly wrong.
roughing the kicker occurs when a player slides into or hits the plant leg while the kicking leg is in the kicking motion. thats exactly what sherman did. running into the kicker is not giving space to let the kicking leg return to the ground after the kick.
its also real interesting how sherman didnt attempt to block anything...he went for the knee of the plant leg. if sherman is so "smart", then he surely knew that the bills had only 1 active kicker.
dirty is as dirty does.
I don't see what he is doing there as trying to block the kick. Blocking a kick means trying to make yourself as big as possible, arms outstretched above your head to ensure you get a hand on the ball. Sherman just looks nothing like that, he is diving arms down with his shoulder and back straight into the dude's leg. I don't know what was in Sherman's head, but it certainly looks like a really dirty, cheap shot on film.
As far as whether it was roughing the kicker that's not even debatable the NFL has admitted that, and admitted they screwed up and didn't reset the play clock on the FG that was good.
If the NFL admits all of this stuff and is throwing their refs under the bus...you know it has gotten out of hand. 3 out of the 8 or so articles frontpaging nfl.com are about this issue currently.2. Somehow, a personal foul for unnecessary roughness wasn't called. Blandino confirmed this was a mistake.
"The referee didn't think that the contact was severe enough, he felt that players were coming together and he just didn't think it was a foul," Blandino said. "We looked at it, it is a foul."
On the ensuing field-goal attempt, the referees flagged the Bills for delay of game even though an official was over the ball with less than 10 seconds remaining on the game clock. Blandino said referees need to reset the game clock if they're handling the ball with fewer than 20 seconds left on it.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...n-seahawks-win
I don't see this as throwing the refs under the bus. "Under the bus" means you as a leader tell somebody to do something, and when they do it, you withdraw all support. That's the not the case here.Originally Posted by redhaze
The refs are supposed to know what roughing the kicker is, and they are supposed to reset the play clock in accordance with the rules. There are seven - SEVEN - officials on the field. How can they completely blow a field goal attempt? There is so much less going on, versus most other plays. It should be easy. Massive Eff up.
Last edited by UrbanMan; 10-11-2016 at 12:22 AM.
the NFLs preeminent player rankings:
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro...m_campaign=nfl
sherman is not in the top 6. hmm...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)