Thread: LGBT Group "Slams Dean For Threatening To ‘Check’ Trans Student's Genitals - Thailand

[condescension]*mega-sigh*[/condescension]

Originally Posted by tomcat

*sigh*...where to begin?...

Here?:

Originally Posted by CaptainNemo

If you actually wanted to change gender

...gender is already established; it's modifying the body to make it suit the gender...

Bollocks. That's just adding another imaginary layer of stuff to the conclusion to make the argument work (i.e.: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy).
If you want to "modify the body" to suit your imaginary notion of body-disconnected gender, then you have to modify all of it.

Originally Posted by tomcat

Here?:

Originally Posted by CaptainNemo

Playing with words to redefine "gender" as fluid, to the extent that no genders exist, seems a bit cynical and disingenuous.

...also seems stupid when genders clearly exist...

Well do they? Because traditionally, they existed, until a few political morons in the 70s started creating an imaginary overlay where gender is fluid, and has no actual boundaries, not just to accommodate hermaphrodites, but every whim or notion under the sun. If there is no boundary between however many genders you think there are, how can you say any of them exist? A thing needs a definition, to be a thing, doesn't it?

Originally Posted by tomcat

or here?:

Originally Posted by CaptainNemo

Some might consider it to actually be potentially quite cruel to allow people to persist with this delusion,

So, all those folks who modify their noses, cut away turkey necks, undergo breast reductions (or implants), tummy tucks, butt lifts etc are delusional...or is it only folks who want to match gender and physical body that you think of as sick?...

So firstly, "sick" is your word, and that speaks volumes about you, not me.
You're right, plastic surgery for vanity rather than reconstructive medical reasons is not a great idea for society, but it's also littered with fallacies... false comparison - you know, like the one about comparing nonces with ponces... mainly false premise - you are arguing as though you have established your premise as true, when you haven't - in fact your whole schtick has argument by assertion or argumentum ad lepidum written all over it.

...monstrous, unadulterated ignorance with keyboard attached...[/quote]
Speak for yourself, big boy.
Try opening your mind to more than just feminist pseudo-academic crap from the 70s - none of it passes muster when critically analysed, sociology is just politics pretending to be science.

I understand TIT. A lot of fudge packing goes on here. Sorry if I offended any faggots.

OK, I have to admit. After further review. The girl in the picture. If she bent over I would probably shove my cock in her, him, whatever.

Originally Posted by tunk

If she bent over I would probably shove my cock in her, him, whatever.

I'll send her a warning...