Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
The post mortem confirmed Miller had been struck with a blunt instrument other than the hoe, probably a wooden cudgel of some sort.

Of course there will be inconsistencies, anomalies and conflicting facts: there always is when the truth is not relevant and those orchestrating this have absolute power.

Why though the British ambassador should be a willing partner in all this is incomprehensible.

To be complicit in an attempt to pervert the course of justice that exculpated the guilty and condemns the innocent is not within his brief as representative of the British government. It beggars belief and is quite shocking. Surely it cannot just be incompetence? Perhaps he is ill and no one is prepared to rein him in?
There has to be a reason. Buggered if I can fathom it. The families of the victims and their friends must surely be aware of events and are clamouring for explanations.
Where are you reading an autopsy report? Is it possible you quoting reports on a report based on third hand + translated info?
To me, wounds on the back of Miller's head were deep slash cuts and looked consistent with a hoe, not a blunt object.

The British Ambassador is tasked with trade relations, nothing more, nothing less. It would be a diplomatic row if he were to voice what we are all thinking. Unless the families start agitating independent DNA tests, and the British Coroner also took samples from the bodies upon arrival in GB, looks as if this will stick.