Results 1 to 25 of 6901

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,766
    So $800 million to capture 1.5MM tonnes.

    And the global emissions from fossil fuels are 33,000MM tonnes.

    Do you want me to do the maths for you or do you have a calculator handy?

    * Actually it's 93% of 33,000MM tonnes, but that was the 2018 figure so probably near 31,000MM.

    Round it down to 30,000MM, it probably won't make a massive difference to your stupidity.

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    01-05-2022 @ 06:28 AM
    Location
    NAKON SAWAN
    Posts
    5,674

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,766

    Still waiting for your cost estimate of 30 Gigatonnes of CO2 Carbon Capture.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    01-05-2022 @ 06:28 AM
    Location
    NAKON SAWAN
    Posts
    5,674
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Still waiting for your cost estimate of 30 Gigatonnes of CO2 Carbon Capture.
    Sure thing right after you give a time and cost estimate of replacing everything that uses fossil fuel with non fossil fuel equivalents.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,766
    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65 View Post
    Sure thing right after you give a time and cost estimate of replacing everything that uses fossil fuel with non fossil fuel equivalents.
    It pays for itself you retarded old fool. There's your answer.

    Now where's mine or is it too difficult for you to work out?

    Replacing the costliest 500 GW of coal with solar PV and onshore wind next year would cut power system costs by up to USD 23 billion every year and reduce annual emissions by around 1.8 gigatons (Gt) of carbon dioxide (CO2), equivalent to 5% of total global CO2 emissions in 2019.
    Renewables Increasingly Beat Even Cheapest Coal Competitors on Cost

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    01-05-2022 @ 06:28 AM
    Location
    NAKON SAWAN
    Posts
    5,674
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    It pays for itself you retarded old fool. There's your answer.

    Now where's mine or is it too difficult for you to work out?



    Renewables Increasingly Beat Even Cheapest Coal Competitors on Cost

    Ok but what about cars,trucks,trains,planes these all use fossil fuels how long and what costs to replace all of these with workable alternatives?

    Actually I have no interest in working anything out for you. If you were to actually read the information I put up you would see that it is becoming evident eliminating fossil fuels is not enough existing carbon will have to be removed to meet the goal to reverse climate change.

  7. #7
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    26,209
    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65 View Post
    Actually I have no interest in working anything out for you.
    No interest or can’t


  8. #8
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    102,766
    Quote Originally Posted by RPETER65 View Post
    Ok but what about cars,trucks,trains,planes these all use fossil fuels how long and what costs to replace all of these with workable alternatives?

    Actually I have no interest in working anything out for you. If you were to actually read the information I put up you would see that it is becoming evident eliminating fossil fuels is not enough existing carbon will have to be removed to meet the goal to reverse climate change.
    You can't work it out because you're a senile fucking moron. All of those existing trucks and cars will be phased out over time, renewable fuels are in development for air travel. I'm guessing you haven't heard about electric trains, since you're evidently stuck in the fucking 50's.

    Fossil Fuels make up 30 Gigatonnes of CO2 emissions.

    You've already posted that it costs $530 MILLION to capture one million tonnes.

    Ergo it would cost around 16 TRILLION dollars.

    Who is going to pay for this crackpot scheme of yours?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 23 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 23 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •