That bsnub being an obese alcoholic goes snowboarding is actually quite funny.
That bsnub being an obese alcoholic goes snowboarding is actually quite funny.
Little more from Mann/news,…..
Michael Mann, known for his work on the “hockey stick” analysis of global warming, can proceed with defamation claims against writers who called him the “the Jerry Sandusky of climate science” and characterized his work as fraudulent.
WASHINGTON — Climate scientist Michael Mann, known for his work on the “hockey stick” analysis of global warming, can proceed with defamation claims against two writers who accused him of fraud and academic misconduct, an appeals court in Washington ruled on Thursday.
Mann brought the case against Rand Simberg, writing for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn, writing for the National Review. CEI general counsel Sam Kazman said in a statement that they were confident they would ultimately win the case.
And
Michael Mann - Some Key Additional Excerpts From Today's Appeals Court Decision Affirming My Right to Proceed With Defamation Suit Against The Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Review
42. in this case there is, at this point, no similar evidence that Mr. Simberg, Mr. Steyn, CEI, or National Review conducted research or investigation that provided support for their defamatory statements that Dr. Mann engaged in deception and misconduct. The only support cited in the articles are the CRU emails, with primary reliance on the language in one email that referred to “Mike’s Nature trick.” But what the court noted was missing in Jankovic III to support a finding of actual malice is present here: evidence that there was reason to doubt the emails as a reliable source for the belief that Dr. Mann had engaged in misconduct. That evidence has been presented in the form of reports from four separate investigations that debunked the notion that the emails and, specifically the reference to Dr. Mann’s “trick,” revealed deception in the presentation of data and scientific misconduct. (pp.100-101)
Michael Mann: Six to nil
Professor Mann has been targeted and harassed by unscrupulous people for around twenty years, and is standing tall. A recent article at the Washington Post gives some clues to what he has endured, simply for doing scientific research to expand our understanding of climate. This is now the sixth case that Professor Mann has won, including some that have been brought by others, attacking him:
Cuccinelli v. UVA/Mann,
Cuccinelli v. UVA/Mann supreme Court Appeal,
ATI v. UVA/Mann,
ATI v. UVA/Mann Supreme Court Appeal,
Mann v. CEI/NRO/etc DC District Court,
Mann v. CEI/NRO DC Appeals Court
Maybe that's the reason there's nothing (yet) on the blogs of the usual suspects (like WUWT and ClimateDepot. Even several hours later, there's not even been a tip to Anthony Watts from a WUWT reader.). It might be that climate disinformation bloggers are realising they can no longer post their defamatory articles without consequence.
Last edited by S Landreth; 23-12-2016 at 09:01 AM.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Do you have any proof to back up your claims that is what I asked you imbecile. You don't have any. Almost the entire world scientific community says you are wrong.Originally Posted by buriramboy
You are an epic level retard to buy into that tin foiled nonsense. You really deserve the teakdoor village idiot award.Originally Posted by buriramboy
Last edited by bsnub; 23-12-2016 at 10:37 AM.
He has no chance.....You have already won that award every year. You have no competitor that is even close.....Originally Posted by bsnub
If you think that statement is even remotely close to reality you need to have your head examined. You clearly do not read the posts that people like Repeter, Pulvarian, Blue and this clown above make.Originally Posted by koman
I come off as Einstein compared to those clowns. Clearly your diapers need changing.
But he isn't lying. He is spot on.Originally Posted by RPETER65
Anything you attempt to "quote" is badly formatted, has all the social media tags still in it, and is unreadable, and to top it off you can't even do something as basic as post a fucking link.
You're a moron. Just accept it or try and get your IQ into double digits with some learning.
I think it is far to late for him. That ship sailed long ago.Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
This makes the second time you claim my posts are unreadable, the first time I asked if you didn't do English as in why are they unreadable, no response.
I don't take the time to clean out the advertisements,big deal.
I have repeated numerous times my thoughts on your stupid links and all of my quotes include the name of the author.
Everything you listed is just petty BS, get a life.
Look you fucking moron, I'm going to keep this as simple as I can.
This is a Link:
Highlight, Right-Click and Copy.
Now click the little Globe above the message editor with a chain link on it (geddit?) and Right-Click and Paste.
Really fucking simple. Why don't you try it?
And when you've mastered this fucking piece of genius, we'll show you how to use the delete key properly.
^ Jeezus whats next? Showing him how to change his diapers?
You lalalanders could be right about man made climate change, but getting it right would a first for you lot. When I read landreth's stupid graphs I am totally convinced by them, but if I go to a more skeptical source of info eg wattsupwiththat, they are also equally convincing, and their graphs are just as good.
eg https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/12/...atest-results/
However they find no causal link, but a correlation
Moving onto Mann and his hockey stick.It follows that this synthesis of empirical data conclusively reveals that CO2 has not caused temperature change over the past 38 years but that the rate of change in CO2 concentration may have been influenced to a statistically significant degree by the temperature level.
There is even something about that there written by Steyn, the one of the guys he is suing.Mann has been the subject of extraordinary criticism since his research was used as part of the foundation of a 2001 climate science report that found that human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases are the most likely cause of global warming.
Mann said he is "pleased" with the decision, and looking forward to moving on to a jury trial.
"We are particularly pleased that the court, after performing an independent review of the evidence, found that the allegations against me have been 'definitively discredited,'" he said in a statement.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/12/...ey-stick-case/
It was Mann who objected to going to trial! So there is more to this story that the one Landreth is portraying, and it becomes harder to have any faith in his stupid graphs.Er, no. It wasn’t my motion. Nothing to do with me. In fact, I objected to it. As I said above, I thought the appeal was a waste of time, and filed a motion to proceed to trial three years ago. Mann filed a motion objecting to that, a position the judge found “ironic“
Steyn also adds:
In a third of the time it took the DC Court of Appeals to issue their ruling, I managed to write an entire book on the subject (dealing in part with all those faux exonerations): “A Disgrace To The Profession”: The World’s Scientists – In Their Own Words – On Michael E Mann, His Hockey Stick, And Their Damage To Science – Volume One.
Last edited by longway; 23-12-2016 at 08:08 PM.
^ oh great so you show up after the fact and post up a long discredited junk science site. Get the fuck out of here you retarded clown.
You lemmings all drink from the same poisoned Wells.
^^ I am just trying to see what the other side says. Landreth's stuff is convincing, but I dont think it is cut and dried as you make out.
For example, I remember you making a diatribe about Pelke. I looked him up, and he seems quite reasonable, nothing like the impression I had from you.
He believes in man-made climate change, but does not agree that there is enough evidence to show that it is causing the number of storms to increase, and he has been villified, not for disagreeing with the narrative, but merely deviating from it.
It doesn't make you guys look good, very much like your post just makes you look like you belong to a religious cult that cannot abide even the minutest deviation from certain proscribed POVs.
Last edited by longway; 23-12-2016 at 08:44 PM.
There is so much money in global warming now that its totally corrupted the science on it, for example Obama has increased govt grants bye 1300% except if your work doesn't prove global warming is man made. That alone should send shivers down peoples backs, the left has created a new threat to democracy and freedom other then eisenhowers beware the military industrial complex. Its now beware the left wing climate science complex. Both are fueled bye govt money. But the goals of the left wing are much more nefarious then just take our money tho they love doing that too. Its globalization through making the western world poorer bye shipping all our industry to the 3rd world.
For example Obama has just closed off massive areas for oil searching and production. Oil will just be searched for and produced in other countries, thus all the companies, job, taxes, incomes, technology, will go to other countries not us. And there goes our future given to them. When they raise pollution standards in our western countries it forces many companies to choose going bankrupt or leaving for the 3rd world where they can pollute to there hearts content. Again we lose the companies, the jobs, incomes, taxes, technology and the future. With our business tax rate set at 35% we force companies to go bankrupt or leave, again sending our companies, jobs, incomes, taxes, technology the future to the 3rd world. And for all 3 of these points we are cleaner, less polluting, more green then the 3rd world, but the companies moving can now pollute to their hearts content. These points all reveal the lies in the greens and lefts policies. They only talk green, there actions are all anti green and that is the truth.
The really funny thing about the lefts actions is the kickback to it, the American industrial heartland Wisconsin to Pennsylvania has abandoned the dems because of their globalization polices and thus the dems lost the election. Its payback time, elections have consequences, your anti working class globalization policies have had consequences.
Last edited by pulvarien; 23-12-2016 at 09:24 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)