
Originally Posted by
RPETER65
pier review

Its
peer review you moron and if you cant even spell it you sure dont have a damn clue how the process works. Dr. Spencers works did not hold muster in the peer review process you idiot. Those are scientists in the post I made above who are trashing his models and data as flawed. That is how the peer review process works.

Originally Posted by
RPETER65
first to bless a leftist rag when they try to debunk a scientist of the other flavor.
The article is written by a scientist who is quoting other scientists who say Dr. Spencer is wrong it doesn't matter that it was posted by the guardian it is the source material and the scientists that do.
On one side you have a "scientist" who is on the take of big oil and happens to be a libertarian on the other side you have at least ten scientists just in the post I made above saying he is wrong. Once again that is the peer review process exposing bad science.