Quote Originally Posted by koman
The evidence is far from overwhelming....that's the problem. It's actually quite weak and unconvincing in many respects, but it has been subjected to the "bandwagon effect" by those involved in what has become far more of a political movement than a science....
Can you provide some valid evidence to back this claim up? You tried once before and fell flat on your face. Literally all the links you provided were the some that boon mee constantly reposts and all were thoroughly debunked long ago.

Why is it that the scientists are comfortable with the fact that there is clear, conclusive evidence and you are not? Could it be simply that it makes you uncomfortable? Change has away of scaring people and you have proven before in many other threads that you are fearful of change.

Quote Originally Posted by koman
In fact, it's the so called climate "science" itself that's is far closer to a conspiracy.
Can you elaborate on this? I can clearly see a conspiracy on the denialist side. It doesnt take a genius to follow the money trail. However trying to weave a "conspiracy" out of the science gets dicey at best.