Thread: Any doubts about Climate Change?

^ I guess that went over your head...

I guess it did,

So you not answering.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ This is a thread about climate change. Not your off topic dribble.

Urban Dictionary: Gish Gallop

Then don't bring up my beliefs when you have no sensible rebuttal.

Firstly your beliefs have everything to do with it. You are a creationist and hence a dogma slave. You are precisely the type of person that the right wing looks for. You are an easy target and already a push over. Religious people are susceptible to fear mongering and disinformation based on the fact that they are already subservient to religion. So people like you are putty in the hands of the oligarchs.

Dogma=enslavement. You are in a little box that the oligarchs have made for you. You are a slave.

This is a thread about climate change. Stop posting your meaningless dribble.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

This is a thread about climate change. Stop posting your meaningless dribble.

Do you believe that your god put rainbows in the sky as a reminder that he would not fuck around with the climate any more and kill off all the humans and animals bar a few because they displeased him and therefore anthropogenic climate change is impossible?

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Originally Posted by RPETER65

This is a thread about climate change. Stop posting your meaningless dribble.

Do you believe that your god put rainbows in the sky as a reminder that he would not fuck around with the climate any more and kill off all the humans and animals bar a few because they displeased him and therefore anthropogenic climate change is impossible?

Do you have a purpose in posting this useless dribble?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Do you have a purpose in posting this useless dribble?

Of course.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ This is a thread about climate change. Not your off topic dribble.

Urban Dictionary: Gish Gallop

Then don't bring up my beliefs when you have no sensible rebuttal.

Firstly your beliefs have everything to do with it. You are a creationist and hence a dogma slave. You are precisely the type of person that the right wing looks for. You are an easy target and already a push over. Religious people are susceptible to fear mongering and disinformation based on the fact that they are already subservient to religion. So people like you are putty in the hands of the oligarchs.

Dogma=enslavement. You are in a little box that the oligarchs have made for you. You are a slave.

This is a thread about climate change. Stop posting your meaningless dribble.

Far from meaningless this. It is fact.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Far from meaningless this. It is fact.

Facts are themselves meaningless to a Creationist, faith is what counts and if the facts don't match what faith says should be true then it's time to find some different facts.

Here's a bit of weather that will have global implications. At least California will be getting some rain, which will cause flooding and mudslides in areas ravaged by fire in the summer.


El Niño is back, and global temperature records are in danger

That's the word from scientists who have been watching the tropical Pacific. Surface temperatures there are going up, winds are shifting and that could mean big weather-related changes around the world over the next year or so.

El Niño is part of a climate cycle in the tropical Pacific known as the El Niño Southern Oscillation; it flips back and forth every few years between the cool La Niña and the warm El Niño phases. In the El Niño phase, ocean surface temperatures rise, easterly trade winds along the equator slow or even reverse and the planet in general tends to warm up.

Scientists expected El Niño last year, but it was a no-show. But this year, American researchers reported in March that a weak El Niño had finally set in. Now Japanese and Australian scientists say it's definitely here, and likely to be much bigger than the American predictions — with global implications.

Maps of typical jet stream locations and patterns during La Niña (left) and El Niño (right) winters. Patterns are similar in spring, but are often weaker. Based on original graphics from NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center.  © Credit: NOAA Maps of typical jet stream locations and patterns during La Niña (left) and El Niño (right) winters. Patterns are similar in spring, but are often weaker. Based on original graphics from NOAA’s…

In parts of Brazil, it could mean a lot more rain — which could be a good thing, with the capital São Paulo and other parts of the country in the midst of a wrenching drought. In Australia, the effect may well be the opposite: drier and hotter weather in many areas, possibly exacerbating existing water shortages.

That heating and drying out could stretch from Australia all the way around to eastern Africa and southern Asia, possibly cutting into harvests of key crops like rice, soybeans, corn and palm oil from India to China to Indonesia.

 © NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory In the United States, El Niño often brings rain to California and the South, raising hopes that a return this year would bring drought relief to the parched West Coast. That seemed unlikely when scientists identified the weak El Niño in March, figuring it would be too small to have much of an impact. But the prospects for substantial rain could be improved with the revised forecast.

Meanwhile, the global forecast is for higher overall temperatures, quite possibly even a record.

Until last year, the hottest year on record was 1998, which saw a big El Niño. After that, the next warmest was 2010, another El Niño year. Last year broke both of those records by a hair, which was a bit of a surprise — and a concern to many, because it wasn't an El Niño year.

But with the overall temperature trend sharply up — the 10 hottest years on record have all come since 1998 — scientists are anticipating that the warmth contributed by El Niño may well bring another new global record, and perhaps put to rest the contention by climate change deniers that global temperatures have plateaued.


El Niño is back, and global temperature records are in danger

Originally Posted by S Landreth

It looks as if 2015 is on its way to take the short record of 2014 hottest year.

It’s increasingly likely that 2015 will be the hottest year on record, possibly by a wide margin.

NASA reported Wednesday that this was the hottest four-month start (January to April) of any year on record. This was also the second-warmest March on record in NASA’s dataset.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has just predicted a 90 percent chance that the El Niño it declared in March will last through the summer and “a greater than 80 percent chance it will last through 2015.” El Niños generally lead to global temperature records, as the short-term El Niño warming adds to the underlying long-term global warming trend.

And in fact, with April, we have once again broken the record for the hottest 12 months on record: May 2014 – April 2015. The previous record was April 2014 – March 2015, set last month. The record before that was March 2014 – February 2015. And the equally short-lived record before that was February 2014 – January 2015.

As we keep breaking records in 2015, our headlines are going to sound like a … broken record. May has already started out hot, and it is quite likely next month we will report “The Hottest 5-Month Start Of Any Year On Record,” and that June 2014 – May 2015 will become hottest 12 months on record.

This chart (above) uses a 12-month moving average, so we can “see the march of temperature change over time,” rather than just once every calendar year, as science writer Greg Laden puts it.

The global warming trend that made 2014 the hottest calendar year on record is continuing. Some climate scientists have said it’s likely we’re witnessing the start of the long-awaited jump in global temperatures — a jump that could be as much as as 0.5°F.

April was warm across the country and most of the world. That’s clear in the NASA global map below for April temperatures, whose upper range extends to 6.9°C (12.4°F) above the 1951-1980 average.

______

and for you deniers,.here’s a little something for you to read.

Stage 3

It’s the hottest trend in climate denial. Long gone are the days when people can publicly deny that the planet is warming or that humans are responsible without facing widespread mockery. Those who oppose taking serious action to curb global warming have mostly shifted to Stage 3 in the 5 stages of climate denial.

Stage 1: Deny the problem exists
Stage 2: Deny we’re the cause
Stage 3: Deny it’s a problem
Stage 4: Deny we can solve it
Stage 5: It’s too late

Seems as if you do a search on Greg Laden he appears to be some what of a fraud.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Seems as if you do a search on Greg Laden he appears to be some what of a fraud.

Once again you make unsubstantiated claims with no evidence. Post up links. I bet that those claiming he is a fraud are right wing science deniers. Just a guess.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Seems as if you do a search on Greg Laden he appears to be some what of a fraud.

Once again you make unsubstantiated claims with no evidence. Post up links. I bet that those claiming he is a fraud are right wing science deniers. Just a guess.

Go to google type in the name BOOM it is right before your eyes. Not only that but I see you do the same things, also as I have said before your left wing ideas do not make sense with everybody you call anything you dissagree with as coming from a right wing this or that fortunately more and more people are coming to their senses and realizing people like ypu are out to lunch.

Social anarchist

Originally Posted by RPETER65

your left wing ideas do not make sense

Are you suggesting that climate change is some kind of 'left wing' thing?
That's hilarious.
How about the drought in California, is that a left or right wing thing?

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Go to google type in the name BOOM it is right before your eyes.

This site?

Greg Laden | Watts Up With That?

Just as I thought another science denial website run by Anthony Watts who happens to be a college dropout with no background in climate science. Another fail. I dont know much about Greg Laden but I would take his word over a buffoon like Anthony Watts. His website is also funded by the heartland institute. Surprise surprise.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

also as I have said before your left wing ideas do not make sense with everybody you call anything you dissagree with as coming from a right wing this or that fortunately more and more people are coming to their senses and realizing people like ypu are out to lunch.

What planet are you living on? Do you even know any young people? (I highly doubt it) They are walking away from religion and shunning right wing politics in staggering numbers. There is a reason why the Republican party is recognized as the party of angry old racist white men. Because it is.

Wrong site.

I think your a little out of touch with reality as the mid term election shows, takes young people a while to get all their brains.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by RPETER65

your left wing ideas do not make sense

Are you suggesting that climate change is some kind of 'left wing' thing?
That's hilarious.
How about the drought in California, is that a left or right wing thing?

Not climate change, the causes of climate change. As I have said before it is quite obvious the earth has gotten warmer I just don't agree with all the theoretical reasons.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

I think your a little out of touch with reality as the mid term election shows

Oh you make things to easy. The mid term election had the lowest turnout in 72 years. Everyone with a brain knows that when the turn out is low it is good for Republicans because their base is older and the most likely to vote in every election.

That is a big reason why they are so aggressive about pushing voter suppression. They want as few people to get to vote as possible.

To contrast the voter turnout in 08 was the highest in 40 years and the democrats swept all three branches of government.

The more people that vote the more likely the republitards are to lose.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

I think your a little out of touch with reality as the mid term election shows

Oh you make things to easy. The mid term election had the lowest turnout in 72 years. Everyone with a brain knows that when the turn out is low it is good for Republicans because their base is older and the most likely to vote in every election.

That is a big reason why they are so aggressive about pushing voter suppression. They want as few people to get to vote as possible.

To contrast the voter turnout in 08 was the highest in 40 years and the democrats swept all three branches of government.

The more people that vote the more likely the republitards are to lose.

Which only goes to show your libtard buddies are loosing interest.

Energy subsidies top $6.6 trillion, lift carbon emissions by a fifth: IMF study

The world subsidises energy consumption to the tune of more than $200,000 per second, with about 60 per cent of that going to support coal, according to researchers at the International Monetary Fund.
In a paper published by the IMF, the authors found that energy subsidies are much more than previously estimated. These will rise to $US5.3 trillion ($6.6 trillion) in 2015, or about 6.5 per cent of total global output.
For some developing nations, such as in the former Soviet Union and Pakistan, the subsidies approach 18 per cent of GDP.

Energy subsidies top $6.6 trillion, lift carbon emissions by a fifth: IMF study



Tell me again how anthropogenic warming is all a United Nations driven 'One World' scam for profit...

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Which only goes to show your libtard buddies are loosing interest.

Arguing with idiots gets stale quite quickly.

Noted climatologist Joe Bastardi

Booners do you actually fall for all of that Fox News shit?

Joe Bastardi

Joe Bastardi is a meteorologist for WeatherBell Analytics, where he provides weather forecasts for energy companies and other corporate clients. He also serves as an advisor to the American Tradition Institute and a Fox News contributor. Although he has no climate expertise, Fox regularly turns to him to analyze climate research. Bastardi, who has called manmade global warming "an obvious fraud," has often been criticized by scientists for his "utter nonsense" on climate change.

Yes, you're right Booners, he is definitely noted.

Kerry Emanual, an atmospheric scientist at MIT, spoke with Media Matters via e-mail:

“I might point out that Bastardi's background is in weather forecasting, not climate science. Asking him to comment on the science of climate change is rather like asking a country doctor to comment on the latest developments in biomedical research. The media really ought to know better.”

Joe Bastardi | DeSmogBlog

Joe Bastardi is ‘Completely Wrong’ and ‘Does Not Understand the Very Basics of the Science’, Climatologists Explain
BY CLIMATE GUEST CONTRIBUTOR POSTED ON AUGUST 18, 2011 AT 4:30 PM

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...tardi-science/

^
Think Progress?

Heh..regardless, having the US Coast Guard on guard against Globul Warming is just another example of what idiots we got in Washington.