Thread: Any doubts about Climate Change?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

German Shepards are dogs but that doesn't mean that all dogs are German Shepards, pseudo.

Maurice Strong is a human, but that does not mean that all humans are Maurice Strong, in that not all humans created the climate change scam. Maurice strong did though.

Ahh yes - I see what you mean. Thanks for correcting me. Now, go and research why the Fed being Private is a very bad thing, now that you know it is indeed private.

So just make shit up then shift the posts when called on it...

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ You are in the hands of the oligarchs. I feel so so sorry.

We all are snubb. Well, in the claws of them, but some of us can see it whilst others can not, wave flags, help them with their tyranny and all the while call themselves an anarchist.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

So just make shit up then shift the posts when called on it...

OK I admit that I have no idea at all on Ants views on the federal reserve. He would never write about things like that because he never expresses a view point, or challenges a view point, but instead just tries to ridicule someone elses.

There. better? I will include Harry in that as well in that you are both the same. Almost identical. Except that you are not a complete and utter cu nt like he is.

So there you go - now if you please, try and actually find the "Flaw" in the assertion that the man, self proclaimed seed and grower of the weed that is Climate scam", Mauri Strong, was also an Oil man? A big oil man, in that he owned a sizable oil company.

Where is the flaw in that factual statement?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

It's a big, scary, world out there and the only way some people can make sense of their place in it is to credit events to shadowy powers etc.

Pseudo is not entirely always off base. He is correct about the US need to abolish the Fed bank.

Oh don't say that - Ant and Harry believe the Fed is a Federal Govermnent central bank, and not private. They also both believe that the Fed being a private bank is a good thing!

I've never said anything of the kind either.

But it's typical of tinfoil hat nutjobs to just invent facts to support their fairy stories.

You really are a loser pseudopuss.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Oh FFS Snubby, pseudo's just found another conspiracy rant to go off on, just ignore it because it's fucking meaningless.

In Strong's own words:

Q: Some of the criticism, particularly in this internet age, can be like a virus, going completely unchallenged…


If I spent my time responding to it I'd be doing nothing else. The best thing is just to keep doing what you think is right. I have a website for people to get some factual information about me. That is a type of response, I suppose. Anyone who is seriously interested in me would usually do a little more homework and realise that the extreme criticisms are almost exclusively ideologically based. And they don't bother with facts, they just distort or misrepresent the facts. They haven't silenced me.

It's just typical pseudopuss bullshit nutjob ranting and raving.




Maurice Strong on climate 'conspiracy', Bilberberg and population control | Environment | The Guardian

Its a bit like taking the word of Jimmy Savile that he was not a Pedo.

But it isn't, is it?

Now why don't you admit that you didn't bother to read the interview to get the mans own take on things.

Because that would fuck up your invented narrative, wouldn't it you fucking loser?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

So just make shit up then shift the posts when called on it...

OK I admit that I have no idea at all on Ants views on the federal reserve. He would never write about things like that because he never expresses a view point, or challenges a view point, but instead just tries to ridicule someone elses.

There. better? I will include Harry in that as well in that you are both the same. Almost identical. Except that you are not a complete and utter cu nt like he is.

So there you go - now if you please, try and actually find the "Flaw" in the assertion that the man, self proclaimed seed and grower of the weed that is Climate scam", Mauri Strong, was also an Oil man? A big oil man, in that he owned a sizable oil company.

Where is the flaw in that factual statement?

Actually that's not any better.

Because if I recollect correctly I have posted about the Fed, a doco that I had seen I think.

I just didn't post anything anywhere near to what you claimed I had.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

So just make shit up then shift the posts when called on it...

OK I admit that I have no idea at all on Ants views on the federal reserve. He would never write about things like that because he never expresses a view point, or challenges a view point, but instead just tries to ridicule someone elses.

There. better? I will include Harry in that as well in that you are both the same. Almost identical. Except that you are not a complete and utter cu nt like he is.

So there you go - now if you please, try and actually find the "Flaw" in the assertion that the man, self proclaimed seed and grower of the weed that is Climate scam", Mauri Strong, was also an Oil man? A big oil man, in that he owned a sizable oil company.

Where is the flaw in that factual statement?

Actually that's not any better.

Because if I recollect correctly I have posted about the Fed, a doco that I had seen I think.

I just didn't post anything anywhere near to what you claimed I had.

Logical fallacy that is - the fatal flaw in this is that you did not post a "doco" unless you care to prove it you nutbar wing flip barium foil hat wearing what ever else (fill in the blanks).

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Oh FFS Snubby, pseudo's just found another conspiracy rant to go off on, just ignore it because it's fucking meaningless.

In Strong's own words:

Q: Some of the criticism, particularly in this internet age, can be like a virus, going completely unchallenged…


If I spent my time responding to it I'd be doing nothing else. The best thing is just to keep doing what you think is right. I have a website for people to get some factual information about me. That is a type of response, I suppose. Anyone who is seriously interested in me would usually do a little more homework and realise that the extreme criticisms are almost exclusively ideologically based. And they don't bother with facts, they just distort or misrepresent the facts. They haven't silenced me.

It's just typical pseudopuss bullshit nutjob ranting and raving.




Maurice Strong on climate 'conspiracy', Bilberberg and population control | Environment | The Guardian

Its a bit like taking the word of Jimmy Savile that he was not a Pedo.

But it isn't, is it?

Now why don't you admit that you didn't bother to read the interview to get the mans own take on things.

Because that would fuck up your invented narrative, wouldn't it you fucking loser?

Read it a while ago. The guuardian? not turstworthy for a start in that they are staked up in climate scam, and taking the word of the climate scam little baby jesus that is Mauri Strong?

Jimmy - are you a PEDO? Umm no. Ok, says harry, good enough for me.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Logical fallacy that is - the fatal flaw in this is that you did not post a "doco" unless you care to prove it you nutbar wing flip barium foil hat wearing what ever else (fill in the blanks).

Your tendency is just to double-down on the drivel and hope that nobody notices, innit.

^ Yep. I give him the benefit of the doubt. Still.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Logical fallacy that is - the fatal flaw in this is that you did not post a "doco" unless you care to prove it you nutbar wing flip barium foil hat wearing what ever else (fill in the blanks).

Your tendency is just to double-down on the drivel and hope that nobody notices, innit.

the flaw in your logical fallacy is two fold. Except when having to deal with you, I do not write drivel. However, when dealing with you, I purposefully write things that you would assume is drivel, but in fact is targeted this way to make you think that. A line of a character in a Shakespeare play might utter a phrase that is complete drivel, but that does not mean that everything Shakespeare wrote was drivel. The other flaw is I am doubling down which implies raising the stakes. But there are no stakes at play. It does not cost anything other than a bit of time, and your sanity, to play this game, so doubling down what exactly?

So two flaws to your logical fallacy. A third could be "hoping" that no one would notice. Do you really think that I believe no one would notice? If that was the case would it not be reasonable to assume that I write it hoping someone would indeed notice? So again, another flaw in your logical fallacy.

Please find a report in any of the I LOVE CLIMATE SCAM media or press, which is the majority, which says that Mauri Strong was not the architect of climate scam. every obituary of Chairman Mau's best mate states very cleary he was the godfather of climate scam.

States something that's not true that he can't back up; somehow comes full circle to demanding proof of a negative lest he believe the positive...

Yep, utter drivel.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

demanding proof of a negative lest he believe the positive.

Here's the problem with you lot - I could show you proof until your eyes fell out. I could post every obit about Mauri Crook strong showing that he is indeed the creator of climate scam (although in the obits it would call it "man made climate change awareness on a political level that need address with taxation" or some real drivel like that.

I could do, but to quote hillary , what difference would it make? you would still say "no". He is. Strong created climate scam. He did. The analogy of him and savile is correct - for a long time savile got away with it by denying it, ignoring it, using his connections in media to get away with it....

Here's another demand for proof of negative then - find one post yo have ever made that is not complete and utter drivel, Yeah, sorry, impossible that one.

Yo could also post logical and coherent posts and debate issues with resorting to ludicrous levels of disingenuity and logical fallacy.

But you don't.

You could also post relevant, on topic, posts and debate issues without resorting to ludicrous levels of braggadocio and obtuseness.

But you can not.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Because that would fuck up your invented narrative, wouldn't it you fucking loser?

Sorry
Are you not able to look at the post above?
Very easy to do, but alas you do not read so well.
I did make it up as an example of the sort of bollocks a clueless dolt like you would believe.
Live with it - you know that in your heart you love the Fed.
Easy enough to work that out about one of your types.

In reality though, they are all in it togehter. If you see the corruption in the Fed
seriously how can you support climate scam when they are so involved?

You don't bother to think along those lines though.
Only see your Dot and never try to connect them up, or think they are connected.
Unlike tin foil nutters that you call them who step back and can see the clear connections.
Really not that hard to see.

Hardly surprising though in that you see to think that swallowing climate scam is cool
Every mainstream bullshit media you read tells you it is, so you go with it.
Rarely a knobber can accept they have been duped like you are being still.
Only a real man can accept, like I did above, when you are wrong.

This is the sort of insane rambling I would expect from OhOh when he's off his meds.

What are you dribbling on about?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Read it a while ago. The guuardian? not turstworthy for a start in that they are staked up in climate scam, and taking the word of the climate scam little baby jesus that is Mauri Strong?

Ok, so it's obvious that you're just drunk and making an arsehole of yourself.

Time you spent some time AFK methinks.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Because that would fuck up your invented narrative, wouldn't it you fucking loser?

Sorry
Are you not able to look at the post above?
Very easy to do, but alas you do not read so well.
I did make it up as an example of the sort of bollocks a clueless dolt like you would believe.
Live with it - you know that in your heart you love the Fed.
Easy enough to work that out about one of your types.

In reality though, they are all in it togehter. If you see the corruption in the Fed
seriously how can you support climate scam when they are so involved?

You don't bother to think along those lines though.
Only see your Dot and never try to connect them up, or think they are connected.
Unlike tin foil nutters that you call them who step back and can see the clear connections.
Really not that hard to see.

Hardly surprising though in that you see to think that swallowing climate scam is cool
Every mainstream bullshit media you read tells you it is, so you go with it.
Rarely a knobber can accept they have been duped like you are being still.
Only a real man can accept, like I did above, when you are wrong.

This is the sort of insane rambling I would expect from OhOh when he's off his meds.

What are you dribbling on about?

Its all about you harry

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Because that would fuck up your invented narrative, wouldn't it you fucking loser?

Sorry
Are you not able to look at the post above?
Very easy to do, but alas you do not read so well.
I did make it up as an example of the sort of bollocks a clueless dolt like you would believe.
Live with it - you know that in your heart you love the Fed.
Easy enough to work that out about one of your types.

In reality though, they are all in it togehter. If you see the corruption in the Fed
seriously how can you support climate scam when they are so involved?

You don't bother to think along those lines though.
Only see your Dot and never try to connect them up, or think they are connected.
Unlike tin foil nutters that you call them who step back and can see the clear connections.
Really not that hard to see.

Hardly surprising though in that you see to think that swallowing climate scam is cool
Every mainstream bullshit media you read tells you it is, so you go with it.
Rarely a knobber can accept they have been duped like you are being still.
Only a real man can accept, like I did above, when you are wrong.

This is the sort of insane rambling I would expect from OhOh when he's off his meds.

What are you dribbling on about?

Its all about you harry

Yeah you can read the shit when you sober up tomorrow and wince in embarrassment.

Fucking loser.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Because that would fuck up your invented narrative, wouldn't it you fucking loser?

Sorry
Are you not able to look at the post above?
Very easy to do, but alas you do not read so well.
I did make it up as an example of the sort of bollocks a clueless dolt like you would believe.
Live with it - you know that in your heart you love the Fed.
Easy enough to work that out about one of your types.

In reality though, they are all in it togehter. If you see the corruption in the Fed
seriously how can you support climate scam when they are so involved?

You don't bother to think along those lines though.
Only see your Dot and never try to connect them up, or think they are connected.
Unlike tin foil nutters that you call them who step back and can see the clear connections.
Really not that hard to see.

Hardly surprising though in that you see to think that swallowing climate scam is cool
Every mainstream bullshit media you read tells you it is, so you go with it.
Rarely a knobber can accept they have been duped like you are being still.
Only a real man can accept, like I did above, when you are wrong.

This is the sort of insane rambling I would expect from OhOh when he's off his meds.

What are you dribbling on about?

Its all about you harry

Yeah you can read the shit when you sober up tomorrow and wince in embarrassment.

Fucking loser.

it's all about you, and it is also on topic harry.

Originally Posted by S Landreth

Still no science?

He doesn't know the meaning of the word.

Originally Posted by S Landreth

Still no science?

You wouldn't know science if it bit you on your trust fund encrusted ring piece pal.

You have never posted any ScIENCE at all, and only computer models which are only as good as the information put into them. As the information is put in to support the scam that these money grabbing liars have decided upon, it is mostly junk, and when the real truthful results accidentally slip out, they hide them, lie, change them, destroy them, discredit them to keep the gravy train running.

Science? Is pacman science?