9/11 truth

**RDN** · 01-12-2006, 02:15 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

...
Go on, give us a go!

Any brains out there amongst you lot?

HA!

Can't be bothered any more. Logic and reason have no effect on people who think "lack of evidence" = "evidence of what I want to believe".

**ENT** · 01-12-2006, 04:17 PM

RDN,
Reported speed of alleged aircraft approaching Pentagon on 9/11/2001.
Check preceding links posted on this thread.

Cause and effect is not being confused here, your allegation is incorrect.

Logic and reason is the only methodology used in my presentation so far,
(aside from my light hearted requests for response from silent posters)!

Plausible and verifiable evidence can support a statement of, or argument for an event to have occurred. In the case of the alleged aircraft strike on
the Pentagon, there is insufficient corroborative evidence offered to support the claim, especially as Pentagon office staff were pictured removing purported evidence within hours of the initial fire, before any forensic examination of the site could take place. In civlized or democratic countries this contravenes established law.
an event

Your above posts are red herrings.

**ENT** · 01-12-2006, 04:19 PM

Above misalignment of text not my doing, just gremlins!

**slimboyfat** · 01-12-2006, 04:24 PM

Originally Posted by RDN

Originally Posted by ENT

...
Go on, give us a go!

Any brains out there amongst you lot?

HA!

Can't be bothered any more. Logic and reason have no effect on people who think "lack of evidence" = "evidence of what I want to believe".

just give in and let them go back to their David Icke books

**ChiangMai noon** · 01-12-2006, 04:28 PM

Originally Posted by slimboyfat

just give in and let them go back to their David Icke books

excellent line of reasoning.
very germaine to the matter at hand.

**slimboyfat** · 01-12-2006, 04:29 PM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Originally Posted by slimboyfat

just give in and let them go back to their David Icke books

excellent line of reasoning.
very germaine to the matter at hand.

come on man, you got 300+ posts already.

congratulations by the way

**ChiangMai noon** · 01-12-2006, 04:31 PM

Originally Posted by slimboyfat

congratulations by the way

thanks..
and we are still only on the pentagon.

notice how ENT's name is there in the middle.

very strange.

**ENT** · 01-12-2006, 04:38 PM

Slimboyfat,
Is there light at the end of that particular tunnel, or is it a place where the sun never shines?

CMN,
If that is what they wish to do, I have no objection.

**ENT** · 01-12-2006, 04:40 PM

Are you referring to my middle name CMN?

**ChiangMai noon** · 01-12-2006, 04:41 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Are you referring to my middle name CMN?

I was referring to your nick actually.

**ENT** · 01-12-2006, 04:44 PM

CMN
Congtats. An award in the form of an amber fluid will be delivered to you in the not too distant future.

Then it''ll be your shout mate!

**ENT** · 01-12-2006, 04:46 PM

P. Entwistle Agony

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 02:31 AM

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Y'all been smokin' that Khon Kaen Crippler again?
There weren't no conspiracy other than a load of Islamos flying big planes into tall buildings. Get real...

There you go, drag wee details into your argument!

Wtf did the planes have to do with it!?

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 02:38 AM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Originally Posted by Maudib

And let's not forget, those airplanes didn't just fly themselves into the twin towers or the Pentagon

There was no aeroplane at the Pentagon.
That seems pretty clear given that no one has ever seen one.

Come to think of it neither did I, but I did see two big ones disappear into the towers, debris of what looked like a plane in a field, and also a gaping hole in the Pentagon on the same day, which I assumed was made by another plane seeing as four were hijacked, or was the 4th an insurance job?

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 02:42 AM

Originally Posted by ceburat

Originally Posted by Butterfly

If God asked you to betrayed your country, would you do it ?

Butterfly, God is not silly and play stupid games as you do. Grow up.

Hmmm...isn't it said He created Man?

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 02:45 AM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Originally Posted by William

^ CMn 9-11 Research: Pentagon Attack Eyewitnesses seems rather compelling - no?

nope...
i want to see a bloody plane.
or some marks that a fukking big plane would have left or some bits of plane flown by some guy that couldn't fly a plane left where the plane flown by the same unflying guy would have left them, or a bit of wreckage or something.

The important thing is that God saw the plane, otherwise the terrorists martyred themselves in vain.

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 02:50 AM

Originally Posted by William

Let's get this clear:

Are you claiming Flight 77 did not crash, or are you claiming Flight 77 did crash, but not for the reasons stated?

Where is it? Is it still flying? It hasn't landed at any airport, a hole appeared in the Pentagon at about the time they stopped looking for it, and its passengers and crew are missing and presumed murdered.

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 02:55 AM

Originally Posted by benbaaa

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

show me another building in the history of the world that has collapsed via fire.

Show me another building in the history of the world that hasn't collasped after a fucking airliner flew into it.

We all know what you're doing CMN, so stop it right now. Pretending you're some nutty conspiracy theorist now your pet whacko kerux has left us. Really.

I don't think (even) he disputes the towers collapsed, but seems to be struck by disbelief that a building might fall down simply because they built it in the path of a commercial airliner.

**keda** · 02-12-2006, 03:01 AM

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Originally Posted by benbaaa

Show me another building in the history of the world that hasn't collasped after a fucking airliner flew into it.

the eiffel tower 1909

1909...1909, so it musta been a real bruiser of a plane, yeah?

**Mr Earl** · 02-12-2006, 05:26 AM

Originally Posted by keda

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Originally Posted by Maudib

And let's not forget, those airplanes didn't just fly themselves into the twin towers or the Pentagon

There was no aeroplane at the Pentagon.
That seems pretty clear given that no one has ever seen one.

Come to think of it neither did I, but I did see two big ones disappear into the towers, debris of what looked like a plane in a field, and also a gaping hole in the Pentagon on the same day, which I assumed was made by another plane seeing as four were hijacked, or was the 4th an insurance job?

The whole thing was a massive insurance scam, and an airline scam to get the government to bail them out of the hole they were in.
The part of the pentagon that got hit was closed for repairs anyway.
And give the government a reason to print more money to go to war. Subsequently causing a drop in the value of the dollar so more American weapons and airplanes can be sold overseas.

**ENT** · 02-12-2006, 07:41 AM

The horrifying part of all this is the suppression of information concerning the 9/11 events.

Web sites refering to 9/11 are unavailable and no findings from an enquiry into the events have been published by the US government to this day.

Hitler, Stalin and Mao Dzedong are starting to look like choirboys in comparison to Bush et al.

God bless America, it needs all the help it can get.

**RDN** · 02-12-2006, 01:26 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Above misalignment of text not my doing, just gremlins!

There is no evidence to support the existence of gremlins. Any film or films you may have seen purporting to show gremlins were, in fact, fakes.

Your misaligned text was the result of either poor editing on your part, a poor Internet connection, or a malfunction of either your computer or the TD server.

On the other hand, it is possible that one of the mods edited your post in order to misalign the text. The reason for this is unclear, and the lack of an "Edited by..." at the bottom of the post does not support this theory.

I go for the "poor editing" scenario.

**ENT** · 02-12-2006, 01:48 PM

Rdn,
My asides regarding gremlins were a pure and utter joke!

The term was exhaustively used by NASA during early malfunctioning space shots during the "60s. The term was derived from European folklore as reference to malificent beings. I used the term looslyto describe the behaviour of my PC.

I have no debate with you upon your contentions, I agree with you whole heartedly!

My PC's behaviour was not as beneficial to me as I desired, therefore I blamed the gremlins at work in it. Simple?

**ENT** · 02-12-2006, 01:50 PM

I did in fact put capitals in for your name in the above text, but they appear as though not, only the R.

**stroller** · 02-12-2006, 01:52 PM

Originally Posted by RDN

There is no evidence to support the existence of gremlins. Any film or films you may have seen purporting to show gremlins were, in fact, fakes.

To take the lack of evidence as proof that there are no gremlins, is a fallacious argument, as we established earlier on.
And do you really believe anyone would go out of their way to fake films about Gremlins? Sounds like some conspiracy theory to me...

Thread: 9/11 truth

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions