Better report the posts concerned.
Let's hope the mods will take appropriate action.
Better report the posts concerned.
Let's hope the mods will take appropriate action.
But too fuckin pig-headed to click the link and look at plane parts eh?Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
![]()
Guess you did not see the pics of the planes engines inside the pentagon walls then ????
WTC 7 collapsed because it was damaged by falling debris and most of 1 whole corner was gone. several firefighters, policeman and civilian witnesses have publicly stated that the building was leaning very badly and it was no surprise that it collapsed !!!!
why do people such as KERUX AND YOURSELF think that your opinion outweighs that of hundreds eye witnesses and hundreds of professional demolition firms that say the wtc buildings were not a controlled demolition??????????
I would be willing to bet you believed Charles Manson when he stated he was god , didn't ya
Believe it or not I also think the government is lying or not telling the whole story. But I do happen to believe a plane hit the Pentagon based on my own thinking and not on what I read on the internet. Logic tells me that a plane hit the Pentagon; a missile could not have punched its way through three rings of the Pentagon and destroyed the front of the Pentagon at the same time. Only the destruction of numerous concrete reinforcements in a wide pattern could do such a thing (and the blackened roof is a dead giveaway of a massive fire...not possible from a missile).
^ ya forgot that a missle would have had to flown a zig- zag pattern to knock down all of the light poles that were hit, all the while not exploding while knocking them down !!!
A cruise missile would have caused this kind of damage as well:
![]()
No he didn't but nice try.Originally Posted by RDN
Neither can anyone show it was a missile or not a plane. If a missile hit the Pentagon then explain why there's a hole going three levels into the Pentagon with black flames and a fireball on the outer ring, charred roof structures far away from the impact point, and, explain how the missile failed to explode on impact. If it was a missile why was there little damage suggesting an explosion? Why did the debris from the impact carry forward rather than explode outwards? I don't see anyone showing evidence that it was a missle or other object. I do see people demonstrating how a plane could have caused that destruction. The only way to prove it wasn't a plane would be to have evidence of the same kind of aircraft slamming into a similar structure and surviving largely intact. There is no such crash in history to use as a reference, therefore, how could anyone logically suggest what would survive such a crash and what wouldn't?
Originally Posted by surasak
OK now here's where ya lost the plot pal, Conspiracy theorists and logic??? Where's the fun in that? Let 'em rant.
Correct. And therefore both sides are conspiracy theories. We really don't know.Originally Posted by surasak
We don't what kind of missiles, and frankly how many missiles tech specs do you intimately know ?Originally Posted by surasak
Well there is a way but the government won't release it. The missing frames of the parking lot cam. Did you see the existing footage btw ? why wouldn't they release the fulll version ? kinda suspicious isn't it ? if you have nothing to hide, why are they hidding it ?Originally Posted by surasak
The only possible explanation for a missile would be a cruise missile. They are the only kind designed for low altitude, to evade radar, and hit a target almost perpendicular to the face (i.e. useful for taking out things not accessible by aircraft guided bombs). The problem with the cruise missile theory is that cruise missiles have to be fired from something. A ship, another airplane, etc. There would people who would know about this. Would the government simply make them disappear to avoid the truth coming out? Be reasonable, nobody went missing after 9-11 did they? The trajectory could suggest a missile if the third ring exploded and contained most of the destruction. But that wasn't the case. The debris and destruction is just like that projected by the Perdue University study.
I'm of the theory, however, that if the government is lying about the plane then why not cover up the fact that WMDs weren't found? Sure a government that could devise such as scheme as to destroy the WTCs and the Pentagon would also plant WMDs in Iraq to make it appear the government was correct and the world was wrong. What I do think is plausible is that the government fucked up, or, possibly was complacent in allowing the attacks to happen to promote the neocon agenda. I don't buy the theories that something other than a plane went into the WTCs and the Pentagon.
I know you've heard Rumsfeld's statement about a 'missile' hitting the Pentagon, but, in general terms I'm sure you know a missile also means any projectile that hits a target (like an arrow, for example, can be called a missile).
How would you know ? did you tally everybody yourself ? how about the old security guy who saw everything from the Pentagon Parking Lot. He wouldn't talk and died of a "heart attack" 3 months later.Originally Posted by surasak
I don't think the "government" per so did it. But a black op from a special unit could have been involved with the Mossad. A bit of a stretch and sounds too much like a movie, but sometimes reality goes beyond fiction, so really who knows. Again, Bush might have known about it, but hardly organizing it. Too stupid to tight his own shoes.
If enough people suddenly turned up missing there would be someone who would put two and two together. To pull off a massive coverup requires quite a few people and you can't go around knocking people off for the risk of being caught. Easy to coverup an assassination but something of this magnitude? Nah, I'm sure it was a plane. People just expect large chunks of plane and when the plane disintegrates they can't comprehend how it could happen.
In contrast if some intelligence were put together very few would know the whole truth since the intelligence agencies piece stuff together and assemble it up the food chain. Those at the top know everything; those at the bottom know nothing other than pieces of something. Easy to cover.
That's why I go with the theory that the attacks were known about but not stopped. Maybe even assisted to some small degree.
That's where the conspiracy theory beginsOriginally Posted by surasak
there were a number of people who started talking after 911, but they were shutdown by Faux and friends immediately as nutcases and unpatriotic. Not the best environment to encourage people to talk.
Did you know during WW2 and some extend after WW2, most jews wouldn't talk about death camps, as it was taboo. Some in the early 1940s thought it was some "leftist" propaganda and even the US couldn't believe death camps were happening. Nobody believed that Hitler and his team would go as far, and for the jews who escaped and witnessed all of it, they were labelled "nutcases" when trying to confront the truth with authorities. To this day, we really don't know how many and who exactly was killed as this topic is still highly taboo. People shutdown their mind as soon as they see a glimpse of the ugly truth because the truth is not always pretty. It's an emotional protection.
So in the case of the death camps, jews who escaped couldn't warn other jews because they were automatically labelled "nutcases" and after a while they stopped talking because it was non-sense. The autorities wouldn't believe them, their own people wouldn't believe them, their own family would shut them down for trying to scare them etc... Even the German civilians claim they didn't know. Is it possible in these days and ages to put together some crazy ops without having the public be aware of it ? you bet it is. People are too busy with their lives to care. 911 could have been an inside jobs with everybody knowing it, it wouldn't have mattered at the end, people just don't care. The public is just coward and pathetic. The public doesn't deserve much credit as it is easily scared and fooled. The only time when the public is heard is when they carry out revolutions, but in the meantime they are just clueless sheep waiting to be fed to the wolves.
Last edited by Butterfly; 26-11-2006 at 04:42 PM.
And that's the scary part since death due to terrorism doesn't even make the list of the top threats to the average American's life:
Odds of Dying - NSC
Would there have been any support at all for the Iraq war without 9-11?
NO, don't believe there would have been a lot of support either for invading Iraq as "we wont their oil and a strategic position in the Middle East for further escapades"!Originally Posted by surasak

![]()
![]()
What? You want him to personally visit all the dead peoples' relatives and ask them if they saw them get on Flight 77 and whether they are still alive? That's a bit much isn't it?
People have heart attacks all the time. Including "old security guys".
Yes it does - is it like that '24' program too?![]()
Take a close look at the hole punched in the wall in the pic posted above.
The bricks on the left have been cut in a straight line vertically.
The top pf the hole is also a nice tidy line.
No evidence of of uncontrolled outward force there, is there?
The wheel rims on the landing gears of Boeings are huge, about the size of large truck rims. The smaller the plane, the smaller the rim.
Not much debris sitting on top of the plane wreckage in any photo so far, a bit odd when the four floors above supposedly crashed down on top of the lot hours later.
Only one eninge's remains found in the wreckage. Where's the other if the plane was twin engine?
Most of the wreckage found outside of the building is scattered in a limited area well to the left of the impact, with little or no sign of burn/explosion, juat shredded bits. These bits don't show in any early shots of the lawn, but appear in later shots.
The lamp posts and fence posts supposedly hit by the plane are all bent at the wrong angle, they don't bend inwards towards the crash site as they should, but away from and sideways to path of the plane's trajectory.
Want more?
Check this out.
http://home.comcast.net/-skydrifter/wxp.htm
link fixed
Last edited by stroller; 28-11-2006 at 05:42 PM.

ENT - are u in the pub with CMN?
how many pints has he bought you for this?
i can confirm he isn't unless he's the 60 year old woman using wireless in the corner.Originally Posted by slimboyfat
show me the plane slimboy.
my mind is open even though i know i'm right.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)