The moderation thread

[keda]

kerux, if you're upset at being called a twat you'd be righteously apoplectic if you saw what I received from a former mod.

[Butterfly]

^ assistant mod actually

[KID]

Those men are heros who deserve a medal

of course they are, and they will receive one.

Support our troops.

Butterfly--that bull shit is not my post. I don't know how you got it on here but I never said any such think about any one deserving a medal.

If our big MOD is on the ball he can correct this with you.

good luck with that situation-- catona changed several of my post's , And MY post's got deleted--- if your not in the same THINKING of the CLIQUE then get use to the abuse !!!

[stroller]

^
I moved this post here from another thread.

Kid, I do not recall any posts from Cantona in Issues misquoting you?
Are you sure it wasn't in a different section?

[kerux]

None of the mods nor members seem to have noticed, perhaps you could point it out when this happens?

"None of the mods or members seem to have noticed?"

No kidding.

rather than pulling bible quotes

Ah, crux of the entire "Kerux' problem, 'pulling Bible quotes."

Even in the Bible 101 thread?

Even in the Evolution versus the Bible thread? [Which I did not start]

[kingwilly]

Even in the Evolution versus the Bible thread? [Which I did not start]

mate it took you about 17 pages to actually answer any of the questions posted by the OP. and even then never directly.

is that not evasion ?

[kerux]

Here are the facts:

I was asked to refute the tea pot in the sky which is a direct attack against the God of the Bible and I was directed by Stoller to

please make an effort to explain your opinions, preferably without posting lots of 'funny pics' and bible-quotes which add nothing to the discussion, Stoller

I'm to reply to a post attacking God w/o using Bible quotes? That's like proving that a record is indeed a world record w/o quoting the Guiness Book of World Records.

I'm admonished to not 'posting lot's of funny pics" but this is okay?



and this?



Mind you, I don't mind the use of these 'funny pics' IMO it's what makes a forum fun to be involved in.

Stroller, once again, you have a double standard. I may be wrong, but please point out to us where you admonished these posters about using 'funny pics."

which add nothing to the discussion,

"A picture is worth ten thousand words."

And telling me I should reply to posters even if I chose not to for my own reasons, which I hardly do, but then telling me I can't refer to the Bible even if I am responding to a Biblcial question in a Biblically related thread is well.... triply ridiculous.

Stroller, you must be a Brit, because you love control and have a double standard, which I have found to be typically British. Tell me I'm wrong.

[kerux]

to actually answer any of the questions

"Any of the questions?"

[kingwilly]

Tell me I'm wrong.

ok u ARE wrong!

[stroller]

And telling me I should reply to posters even if I chose not to for my own reasons, which I hardly do, but then telling me I can't refer to the Bible even if I am responding to a Biblcial question in a Biblically related thread is well.... triply ridiculous.

You are evading, picking and distorting again.
Thanks for giving a nice example of the very stuff I reprimanded you for.
And I am glad you concentrate on this thread and myself with it now.

I'm to reply to a post attacking God w/o using Bible quotes?

No, "bible-quotes which add nothing to the discussion" -please make the effort to read and understand my words which you have quoted several times now.
I also initially reminded you in a friendly manner that very few people are familiar enough with the bible to make sense of your eclectic selection of out-of-context quotes.

Stroller, once again, you have a double standard. I may be wrong, but please point out to us where you admonished these posters about using 'funny pics."

You draw your own conclusion first, then you ask me for evidence to defend myself?
What about enquiring about the facts first before launching personal attack?
Another nice example of what I criticised you for earlier.

Do you want me to post the pms I sent out here, and publish a copy of the trash-bin?
Should I call other witnesses, will you contact DD again?

You're such a waste of time, dude.

[lom]

will you contact DD again?

Look folks, we've got a grasser on TD

[stroller]

^
No, it's not that.
Darn, I shouldn't have mentioned it.

[RandomChances]

Stroller and Co do a pretty good job moderating this section.
Most posters seem tho think that the only good Mod's are the ones that agree with them all the time

[barbaro]

Most posters seem tho think that the only good Mod's are the ones that agree with them all the time

Many posters seem to think this. But they really shouldn't think this way.

As long as actions are applied fairly.

Because of the rules posted, it makes it easy to do.

[kerux]

I also initially reminded you in a friendly manner that very few people are familiar enough with the bible to make sense of your eclectic selection of out-of-context quotes.

So, because 'few people' are familiar with the best selling non-fiction book in all history, I should stop quoting from it?

If 'few people' are'familar 'with Shakespeare, should we stop quoting him?

I think the problem is a few people are offended by the quotes and would just as soon not read them, but then again, why those people are in the threads dealing with evolution/creation and Bible 101, I have no idea.

That's like going into Nana Plaza and then complaining about the bar girls.

Get real stroller.

Most posters seem tho think that the only good Mod's are the ones that agree with them all the time

No. The good mods are unbaised and impartial. Stroller is neither.

[Kidneystone]

You do have a way Mr K or taking phrases from peoples words completely out of context and making yourself look good, the shame of it from your perspective is that everyone knows you are full of cow doodoo and a confirmed liar and thus not in any way believable.

[lovebucket]

so can you prove that there's no teapot?

no, you foking well can't.

that's why i can't prove there's no god

get it?

(the mods here as far as i can tell, do a good job. won't tolarate your crap for too long anyhow)

[mad_dog]

so can you prove that there's no teapot?

no, you foking well can't.

that's why i can't prove there's no god

get it?

That about sums it up.

[kerux]

Looks good to me too.

[stroller]

So, because 'few people' are familiar with the best selling non-fiction book in all history, I should stop quoting from it?

No, read my comments again.

The good mods are unbaised and impartial. Stroller is neither.

As a poster I am not, that's right.
As a mod, opinions vary - but that's to be expected.
No skin off my teeth.

[kingwilly]

The good mods are unbaised and impartial. Stroller is neither.

i'll jump in here you egotistical maniac, stroller has deleted many a post of mine for being off topic. being no use to the general thread, inflammatory etc.

so no favourtism there.

[Thetyim]

Seconded.

Well said Willy

[keda]

Stroller, here's one for you, seeing as you would never abuse your authority by dusting off the rule book only when it suits you.

To keep others in the picture, since day 5 of being on kerux's ignore list I have been counting the days, on board, usually with a brief comment, and stroller has suddenly decided to delete today's day 9 countup because it is taunting kerux.

So, stroller, how do you know my countup was taunting kerux, or is this tinpot despot doulblespeak up there in the rarefied atmosphere of the TD control tower? And how about my signature, if my countup is taunting kerux, how would you rate my signature, and then, how would you assess other, on- and off-topic posts by many boardies directed at kerux? Also, is it an oversight that my countup days 5, 6, 7 and 8 are mysteriously still on board, or are these in the firing line too? Or is 9 your lucky or unlucky number?

Well, tomorrow I'll be posting day 10 and if that doesn't suit you, go ahead and delete it...I'm sure you are not full of shite as some claim, because you are a mod after all, and that you deleted my day 9 post because, as you said, kerux is being taunted. That is precisely what you said, which means that either kerux told you my countup was taunting him, or you can selectively read selective minds; or of course there is a third alternative, that you realy are full of shite, but as we know that's a non starter. Mind you, kerux has often suggested you're in bovine turd manufacturing, and though I rarely agree with him the law of averages may have kicked in to smite him with a flash of perceiving the obvious.


Stroller, if you do not agree with me on any political point, and on the offchance you have a cohonis or even two hanging where they usually hang, how about discussing it rather than responding like the malicious slimeball you would indeed be if it turns out kerux did not tell you he is being taunted by my countup, which would suggest you were looking to create a cause that would allow you to get off with a childish dig, and I hope you had some vaseline handy as it heightens the thrill and makes for smoother distribution.


Either way, now that you have demonstrated a responsible supermod attitude towards boardie protection, is it only kerux that your powers will be extended to, and if so, will you now delete every post in every thread of each forum that taunts or is otherwise insulting or offensive to him - but dammit, in order to stay fair and impartial, you should extend your modbrella to us all, even at the cost of mass deletion for the common good, to protect everybody who's offended or perceives offence or might be offended under different conditions; this may even earn you a place in modheaven, where you can reign over unruly boardies 24/7 for the rest of eternity.

Or, will you resolve all of the above issues by simply pressing your vanquish button, in which case the question you have just read becomes irrelevant?


Next, if it's of any interest to you and I'm sure it isn't, seeing as this is a mod thread so talk of mods might not be far enough off topic for you to divert or delete it, I have been redded three times since joining this forum, each time by Butterfly, each time for addressing points to non-Butterfly boardies with Butterfly playing no part in the exchanges, each of the first two reds linked to posts for which others greened me for fair responses to macha, and each of his reds arrived with accompanying abuse, one time even claiming he knows how 12 year old schoolgirls would behave under certain conditions; maybe we should know what really goes on in the modtower. Outrageous to say the least, but is this exemplary mod impartiality at work, might a reasonable person consider it or him just a bit odd, or is it that he couldn't stoop that low, never quite made it as a top row prima donna, and might be feeling a bit sensitive the past couple of weeks?

Of course, this has nothing to do with you because Butterfly was only an assistant mod who has since been booted out of the modtower, and naturally this did not happen in response to his persistent abuse of authority, but just thought you might hold an opinion, seeing as Butterfly's moronic behaviour may be taunting me.


By the way, not a teacher by any chance, are you?

[Butterfly]

ok, someone forgot to take his meds today

[Begbie]

Can I be the first to say that this is a very boring thread ?