This is only 3 minutes.
Does anyone have background knowledge of this concept. (I never took astronomy 101) and even if I did, it's hard to conceptualize. But he does use pieces of paper figuratively, to explain what he talking about.
This is only 3 minutes.
Does anyone have background knowledge of this concept. (I never took astronomy 101) and even if I did, it's hard to conceptualize. But he does use pieces of paper figuratively, to explain what he talking about.
............
Here is his background:
Neil Turok
Chair of Mathematical Physics (1967)
Phone: +44 1223 337872
Mobile: +44 7810 143411
Sec: +44 1223 764267
Fax: +44 1223 764984
DAMTP
Centre for Mathematical Sciences
Cambridge University
Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/ngt1000/
Basic concepts are explained in this book
"The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene
This was also made into a television series which you can download via torrent. However the TV series was dumbed down for entertainment so I'd recommend the book.
Well I understood it just, so definately for the layman but it's heavy stuff.
One problem is that theories are going out of fashion so fast that a book written 10 years ago becomes history of science rather than science. A good example of an outdated book is "A brief history of time" big bang was all the rage back then.
I don't really understand brane theory but it's somehow more satisfying than the universe appearing from nothing.
^ Indeed, string theory was in fashion a while back, but they've struggled to put all the bits together....it is an ongoing thing though. Personally, I'm not a big fan of string theory...it's all a abit ropey if you ask me...
Some nice links....all but the last one are fairly recent...
A Grand Idea About The Universal Universe
Theorists Attempt To Determine Whether Particle Physics And String Theory Can Be Reconciled
Theoretical Physicists Develop Test For String Theory
Physical Reality Of String Theory Shown In Quantum-critical State Of Electrons
Unravelling The Random Fluctuations Of Nothing
New Insights Into Open String Theory
"Slavery is the daughter of darkness; an ignorant people is the blind instrument of its own destruction; ambition and intrigue take advantage of the credulity and inexperience of men who have no political, economic or civil knowledge. They mistake pure illusion for reality, license for freedom, treason for patriotism, vengeance for justice."-Simón Bolívar

Nice threadOriginally Posted by Milkman
![]()
I don't know how or when classical physics and quantum physics will be reconciled. The work being done at the sub-atomic level is intriguing and is nullifying many previous assumptions. Brane theory is intriguing because it
provides an understandable, visual model for what might have been. Some very powerful telescopes will be coming online in the near future that will enable researchers to study cosmic events close to the time of the origin of the universe 13.5 billion years ago.
Get your noodles around this:
That might help clear it up a bit, if you follow it. Failing that, the guy with his back to us in the OP's first clip is Prof. Brian Cox. Youtube him as he is quite good as making this stuff make sense.
this is milky we are talking to here.Originally Posted by Begbie
so I'd recommend the TV series.

I looked through them. They are quite interesting.
I have to admit that I had not made the connection between the anthropic principle and the multiverse theory. In hindsight it is quite obvious isn't it?
That idea we are all in a simulation is quite intriguing. A standard theme of science fiction for a long time. One would hope they have really good backup power.It also makes some alternative to the end of the universe, the big switch-off.
Interesting also the part about the further developement of intelligence. There is an alternative path of developement to the one he mentioned. Some believe that artificial intelligence would develop within the next few decades and we won't be able to control it.
What the speaker is talking about seems to be M Theory, not String Theory.
M Theory involves a different number of mathematical dimensions to String Theory. The fact that there is a different number of dimensions means you get the (mem)branes rather than the strings.
Eventually, some bright spark will reconcile quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity and we can all stop going to church.
The only certainly is that this person will not have been a frequenter of Teakdoor's Moronic Kiddies area.
are you certain of that certainty? or is it just highly improbable ?Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

No string theory, but lots of Big Bang info and formation of the universe stuff (in an extremely readable format) can be found in "A Short History of Nearly Everything" by Bill Bryson.
Red sent, that was a boring and really crap book, very similar to reading a shopping list.

Watched the Youtube doco -- "What we still dont know" and was unimpressed.
The hypothesis put forward is based on some fairly flimsy theories. For example, what is this mysterious "anti-gravity force" they talk of that is so precise it must be tuned to trillions of trillions of trillions degrees to make our universe work? I have never heard of it and I doubt anyone else here has either.
And the size of the brain being a limiting factor in intelligence. Their theory seems to be that as brains get bigger they run slower because of distance between the working parts. Sounds logical, but in reality its a crock of shit. They brush over these fundamental issues as if they are a given proven scientific fact in this doco in order to further expand their hypothesis.
Hardly something to be taken seriously.
The Elegant Universe
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)