
Originally Posted by
raycarey

Originally Posted by
Missismiggins
I bet you a penny that you have fancied posting something here, (as I have done) and then either tried to "alter" the original source, as you realised that it would be SHOT DOWN, simply as it came from a Non Politically Correct origin!!!
ahhhh....i think i remember this....you were citing 'stormfront', weren't you?
Perfect!
This is exactly what I mean.
It does not matter if facts are correct, under the PC system, by simply associating the original post as being related or originating from a "NONE PC" source, you immediately try to discredit it, you offer no evidence, not a shred, all you do is..."Ahhh Stormfront" and that is it!!! You hit the fucking nail on the head! Thank you!!
Why don't you go and take a look at some of these "non PC" sites, you might get your eyes opened.
I don't conform to simply accepting everything google tells me, i like to look a bit deeper, and yes sometimes when you start to follow links, you can often en up in some strange places.
But facts are facts, and if they are untrue, then they can be clearly shown to be untrue by pointing out the evidence to discredit them.
But, if you look through some of my more "offensive" or "non mainstream" posts, you will see, as you do in your post, that there is no counter evidence, only the rubbishing of an opinion, (that is usually backed by facts) simply by quoting the source!
If you want an interesting topic to go and look through, and it is a couple of days checking and rechecking, then take a look at this link, then, go and present your response, and provide me with facts, not rhetoric!
bild 1
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
Try and spend a bit of time actually reading it, most people take on look and are horrified that this is even suggested, but it is based on fact!
If you believe in the right to free thought and speech, you should have a good read of this and then prepare your arguments against it, not emotional, but factual.
This is the hard part - there seems to be virtually no FACTUAL evidence to back up a counter argument!
This is where we are! We are forced by laws, in so called Civilised Democracies, to SHUT UP, and simply ACCEPT!! No questions asked!
If they say the sky is green, and pass a law that says everyone must say the sky is green, are you going to say the sky is green, even when it is blue?
I produce photographic evidence that the sky is blue, backed up by photographic experts, and colour analysts, that all say that the sky is blue.
But because "common knowledge" says the sky is green, I cannot even submit my evidence to a court!!!