Thread: koran, allah, and all things islam

Originally Posted by slackula

Jeebus al keda, is that the best you have? It seems like you aren't even trying, you just want to post up some scurrilous rubbish and have it accepted as gospel ( ) by everybody here?

Hi, you must be new here. Welcome to TD!

Originally Posted by slackula

All his posts and claims are comprehensively disproved and he responds with frothing at the mouth, ad hominem, or moving the goalposts.

You may be new here but you're certainly a quick learner!

I don't use the ignore function much (well, except for you, but *everybody* does that right? )

Newb!

It’s wonderful that Roqaya al-Ghassra participated in the Olympic games dressed as she was, because the hijab is a choice, and it’s not about “religious dress” or oppression. It’s a decision about modesty, the same as wearing long sleeves instead of short or a high neckline instead of a plunging one. Her choice is not the same as mine – but it doesn’t have to be under Islam.

"Hijab is a choice"
Did she ever have a choice ? Growing up in a strict muslim family in a country under sharia law ?
A bright example for all future generations in track and freak.... aahemm field. Sorry.



Choice my ass:

The 20-year-old Ethiopian who represents Bahrain has raised the ire of a leading politician in the Gulf State for wearing a short sleeveless top and shorts.

Pictures of her wearing the outfit when winning the 3,000m at the Golden League meeting in Oslo last week have caused outrage in Bahrain. That performance installed Jamal as the favourite for the 1500m here in Holmes' absence.

Hamad Al Mohannadi, the chairman of Bahrain's parliamentary legislative committee, said: "We were all shocked by the look of the young woman . . . the outfit is not in any way related with the normal clothes Bahraini young women are accustomed to wearing."

Bahrain wanted to promote sport but within the "perimeters" of Islam. "It is disrespecting Islamic precepts and offending local values. We should not allow the good name of Bahrain to be abused," Al Mohannadi said. "The athlete should also be made aware of the indecency of her outfit."

Last year Bahrain's Ruqaya Al Ghasra ran the 100m at the Olympics with her legs and arms covered.

Congrat. Miss Al Ghasra, you had a CHOICE and remind me of those stooges of the Führer.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

It’s wonderful that Roqaya al-Ghassra participated in the Olympic games dressed as she was, because the hijab is a choice, and it’s not about “religious dress” or oppression. It’s a decision about modesty, the same as wearing long sleeves instead of short or a high neckline instead of a plunging one. Her choice is not the same as mine – but it doesn’t have to be under Islam.

"Hijab is a choice"
Did she ever have a choice ? Growing up in a strict muslim family in a country under sharia law ?
A bright example for all future generations in track and freak.... aahemm field. Sorry.



Choice my ass:

The 20-year-old Ethiopian who represents Bahrain has raised the ire of a leading politician in the Gulf State for wearing a short sleeveless top and shorts.

Pictures of her wearing the outfit when winning the 3,000m at the Golden League meeting in Oslo last week have caused outrage in Bahrain. That performance installed Jamal as the favourite for the 1500m here in Holmes' absence.

Hamad Al Mohannadi, the chairman of Bahrain's parliamentary legislative committee, said: "We were all shocked by the look of the young woman . . . the outfit is not in any way related with the normal clothes Bahraini young women are accustomed to wearing."

Bahrain wanted to promote sport but within the "perimeters" of Islam. "It is disrespecting Islamic precepts and offending local values. We should not allow the good name of Bahrain to be abused," Al Mohannadi said. "The athlete should also be made aware of the indecency of her outfit."

Last year Bahrain's Ruqaya Al Ghasra ran the 100m at the Olympics with her legs and arms covered.

Congrat. Miss Al Ghasra, you had a CHOICE and remind me of those stooges of the Führer.

Originally Posted by machangezi

Love and worship have to be voluntarily or it has no virtue.
Someone who has "submitted" himself has no credibility.