Why dont you Americans start by throwing out the Saudis??Is it true that the reason why Americans love Saudis is Britain??Originally Posted by StoreKeeper
Does America really care about Britain's interests or care at all??
Why dont you Americans start by throwing out the Saudis??Is it true that the reason why Americans love Saudis is Britain??Originally Posted by StoreKeeper
Does America really care about Britain's interests or care at all??
O what a tangled web we weave
When first we practise to deceive!
Sir Walter Scott
In recent years, the American government only cares about its own interests. And these interests are based upon economic interests.Originally Posted by Mhz
America uses the military to promote its own economic interests.
And no, the U.S. government does not care about Britain.
I wish Britain and other counties (i.e. Oz) would not follow U.S. policies but be more independent.
One recent example is Britain (Blair) working with California at the state level to act on global warming.
............
I'm starting to develop the opinion that the US is quite possibly in the ME in large part to defend British and French interests. They are the ones who were most influential in the ME during the period of 1908-1958. Of course they were often at odds with the Soviets but for the most part the French and British are responsible shaped the present form of the ME.
Of course we care about British interests in the ME. It's starting to hit me that the International policies of the US are very much like British policies prior to the fall of the British Empire. The foreign policies of the UK and AUS and even Japan are very much intertwined with the US.
The more I read about the history of the ME and up to curent events the more I believe there are countries that are very happy that the US invaded Iraq even though they publicly won't admit it. I'm especially pointing a finger at the French.
The British were heavily invested in the ME long before the US and they're heavily invested in there now. I'd almost bet they still have a stronger economical interest in the area than compared to US investment in the area.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhz![]()
The british and the arabs now that calls for a new thread.
It used to be that the British prided themselves on thinking it was their duty to intervene in countries where there existed a corrupt or tyrannical government and believed it was their duty to intervene to keep people from being oppressed by their own rulers (Iraq) ... I think the majority of people in England still believe that way and that's why they support the US in the Iraq.
If the British posters would spend a few minutes thinking about it ... my reasons for supporting the war in Iraq are ironically enough very British like.
Now there are people in Afghanistan who believe Bush is the king of the United States.There are people who believe that the bomiyan statues would wake up one day and eat whole Afghanistan.There are people who believe that eating a dieing man's heart will give them super natural powers.............And there are people who believe America is protecting French and British investments in ME.Originally Posted by StoreKeeper
The only difference between you and the people of Afghanistan as far as I can see is that you can speak English and they cant.
SK,Originally Posted by Storekeeper
I haven't seen recent poll numbers, but the Iraq conflict is not very popular in the UK.
This isn't scientific of course, but I hear a lot of anti-american comment from British mates and acquaintences, and strangers.
I also hear a lot of anti-US sentiment from Aussies, Irish, and a lot of others.
That's absolutely true. The Brits are now VERY unhappy with the Iraq debacle and most people want it to end.
It WILL be the downfall of Blair in the end, and I think Bush too. It may take a while after they've gone, but the whole sorry tale will unfold eventually and they'll be seen for what they are.
You're right, but there are differences too. I posted something a few months ago outlining the differences, but in summary are that times are different now and the US doesn't have the patience to spend a couple of generations working with the people to improve things, whereas in previous times we did. Our elite went to the Colonial office, whereas today's elite want to be the CEOs of MTV.Originally Posted by Storekeeper
You cannae live wiv 'em and ye cannae fucking shoot 'em
"Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live"
author: John Milton
"As the quotation at the beginning of this chapter suggests, the English seem always to have believed themselves entitled to read moral lectures to other races. It is perhaps a little ironical that the British should now smart under the moral admonitions of the Americans, when they themselves in the past so frequently infuriated others in the same manner."
author: Glubb Pasha
^
Totally irrelevant i think to drag up historical shite and use it to claim hypocrisy.
i still hate the English for stealing my country 900 years before i was born, but I'm not a serious journalist.
It is our burden.Originally Posted by Storekeeper
A crock of shit.Originally Posted by Storekeeper

I beg to differ, GS. Yes, I'm unhappy with what's happening in Iraq, but what do you want the US to do? Leave and let it all fall apart in a Shiite / Sunni civil war?
Or try to stop it?
Maybe the "quiet majority" of Brits should speak up more and not be afraid of speaking out against the media-inspired US-bashers.
Perhaps the British went in with good intentions, helping the people, getting rid of a nasty dictator etc. Now however it's obvious that the Iraqi's don't want us in their country. Trying to force democracy on people who've never known it doesn't work. Best thing is to leave them alone to sort it out.
I beg to disagree mate, you hatered for the english probaly stems from much later than that. To the time when people lived in company houses, bought food from company shops, worked in the company mine, their kids went to company school where if caught using the welsh language were beaten.....yup guess who owned the "company" the english....was'nt that long ago either certianaly in my granparents generationOriginally Posted by ChiangMai noon
I have more than the average number of arm and legs
A good thing for the owners, I'd say, got the labor as well as consumer markets nicely under control. Preventing the provincial plebs from speaking their own language as well must have been quite a satisfying feat of domination.
Or did the English bring civilisation, education and opportunities to the locals?

Ah! NOW we're talking! (English, I hope, not that funny, spitty, throaty, dead language). So how come all these mines were English owned? I suppose we stole the land 900 years ago. Still, isn't that what people did 900 years ago?
I wonder who pissed off the English 900 years ago? Maybe I can find someone to hate for the rest of my life, teach my children to hate them and tell everyone on the internet why I hate them.
Nope, can't think of anyone. Sorry.![]()

The trouble is it'll be a friggin' blood-bath. And as most Brits think - or, at least, used to think - it's our moral responsibility to save these idiots from themselves.
Edit:
Just saw Surasak's post above: same reply, really: It'll be a blood bath if we get out. And then we'll be blamed fore the mess that'll happen and that someone will have to clean up anyway.
Just like Africa.
Last edited by RDN; 12-08-2006 at 12:19 AM.
So we keep on then following the same failed philosophy?
What gives the West the right to save non-Westerners 'from themselves?' Do they have the same right to look in the mirror and say 'those infidel Westerners, we should bring our civilization to them regardless of cost?' Would you be happy if the Chinese suddenly thought it fashionable to invade England and station several hundred thousand troops there because your idea of civilization wasn't the same as theirs?
It's going to be a bloodbath whether we stay or go. The fact is that we are not wanted there from the start, so, what makes anyone think that BY STAYING suddenly everyone will decide to sit around campfires roasting marshmellows?
Our forces weren't welcome there, they aren't welcome today, and, likely won't be tomorrow, next week, next month, or next year.
Sooner or later we'll get this uncivilized mentality out of our thick skulls that the rest of the world doesn't need or want our 'civilization.'
Back on the English topic.
We always have our detractors and most of us are used to it. Jealousy is a natural feeling.
At the end of the day, we were stronger than whoever we conquered, and every country benefitted from our influence. Get over it.

Just a normal human reaction to try to save lives.
I think some people would say that is exactly what is happening regarding the Muslim faith.
But we're not trying to kill each other - no English Christian suicide bombers.
Yes, but we believe there will be fewer deaths if we stay.
Of course we don't think that.
Don't you mean "we'll get this civilized mentality out of our thick skulls"? But sometimes you have to save people despite themselves.
I think it would not be very easy just to walk away, let the whole ME implode, burn up, whatever, and shrug our shoulders and say "Not our business".
Like the majority of Brits, i'm not happy about our involvement in Iraq, but we've started the situation that currently exists there and we have a moral obligation to finish it. You can't just go into countries by military force and lead them to the brink of civil war, and then walk out and say 'none of our business we don't like this anymore'.
It is going to cost a lot of money and many more lives but we have no other choice but to see this through to the end. If we leave this situation as it currently stands i wouldn't blame those members of the international community who still give us the benefit of the doubt from shunning us, it would be an absolute disgrace.
It's hard to believe that people are so apathetic about who governs them in Britain that the perpetrators of this mess are still in power. In years gone by, the shame of what has happened with the Iraq debacle would have toppled previous governments. We used to have standards. We now have a prime minister who can lie to his country to suit his own ends with impunity and still reside in Downing Street, and look at the results. Shame on us.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)