I still can't understand why no one has but a bullet in the kunt's head (and Cheney).
I still can't understand why no one has but a bullet in the kunt's head (and Cheney).
It's a mystery...
Guess that's why freedoms are dwindling; Heaven help us.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
SK, Boon Me, Porkie, and the GW Bush Fan Club = Great comedy material

Ray IMHO your question is rhetorical.Originally Posted by raycarey
But I will give you due courtesy just the same.
Dick Cheney is the vice- president. Which means he has his "vices"
Which in turn automatically make him the king of scumbags!
He's the man! He can tell Patrick Leahy to "fuck off" anytime.
If you want someone working for you I'd say you'd want them to have "balls". Dick Cheney has "balls".![]()
Yes and his balls are so big that he was disturbed while hunting a bird and shot his friend.
I wonder what would happen if Dick goes to Iraq to fight the insurgents??
How many U.S soldiers will he kill??
Don't forget attaboy, Mr Earl and eliminator.Originally Posted by Butterfly
Actually, no, I didn't forget them. They are simply pathetic and sad. Not funny. I usually ignore their silly posts, they add nothing in value or entertaining material.Originally Posted by Storekeeper
You in the other hand, you are a Grand Master![]()
This from former (and thankfully dead) Queensland Premier Joh Bjelke-Peterson
On human rights: "What's the ordinary man in the street got to do with it?"
On condoms: "We don't want any of that sort of thing up here."
On press criticisms: "The greatest thing that could happen to the state and nation is when we get rid of all the media ... then we could live in peace and tranquillity and no one would know anything."
On criticism of Queensland's perceived backwardness: "You, you, you, southerners...you all think you can come up here and kick a dead horse when he's down, well I, I, I, you, you, you, just wait & see, mark my word."
On former Chinese leader Mao: "Red is red wherever it is - and I don't trust any of them."
On industrial relations: "The 40-hour week has given the opportunity to many to while away their time in hotels."
On the Joh for PM campaign: "I'm a bushfire raging across the country." And when it failed: "I never really wanted to go anyway."
Sad thing about Bush & co is that this is 2006...not 1976
CLINTON: Well, Mr. Secretary, I know you would and I know you feel strongly about it, but there’s a track record here. This is not 2002, 2003, 2004-5, when you appeared before this committee and made many comments and presented, you know, many assurances that have frankly proven to be unfulfilled, and –
RUMSFELD: Senator, I don’t think that’s true. I have never painted a rosy picture. I have been very measured in my words, and you’d have a dickens of a time trying to find instances where I have been excessively optimistic. I understand this is tough stuff.
whoops!
well, i didn't have a 'dickens of a time' finding them. pretty easy actually.
Dec. 18, 2002: KING: What’s the current situation in Afghanistan? RUMSFELD: It is encouraging. They have elected a government through the Loya Jirga process. The Taliban are gone. The al Qaeda are gone.
Feb. 7, 2003: “It is unknowable how long that conflict [the war in Iraq] will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.”
Feb. 20 2003: “‘Do you expect the invasion, if it comes, to be welcomed by the majority of the civilian population of Iraq?’ Jim Lehrer asked the defense secretary on PBS’ The News Hour. ‘There is no question but that they would be welcomed,’ Rumsfeld replied, referring to American forces.”
Mar. 30, 2003: “It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.”
Think Progress » Rumsfeld: ‘I Have Never Painted A Rosy Picture’ About Iraq
"We need a common enemy to unite us. We need a new threat." , March 2000
--Condoleezza Rice
"We need a new threat as a marker to where we will lead."
--Condoleezza Rice march 2000
"Separation of powers is a problem for foreign policy."
--Condoleezza Rice
Condoleezza Rice quotes---- for your contemplation
Come on stroll you're a Mod here. You can't indulge in this sort of posting. You cite as your source someone else's post on another forum? Please don't lose your new found respectablity. I'm pulling for you. You can do it!
You could have at least quoted from this kooks website:
AND NOW THE APOCALYPSE!! Living In A World Full Of Lies
...Battening on a perpetual war footing maintained since the end of a World War fought against a Nazi madman financed by Prescott Bush, a self-serving Military-Corporate-Entertainment complex urgently needed his grandson to replace an outmoded communist menace with an Islamic bogeyman. ["Chase Banked on Nazis" NY Daily News Dec. 7, 1998] "National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice put it plainly when she told a Houston audience in March 2000: “We need a common enemy to unite us. We need a new threat.” [All Fall Down] "Unfortunately for Americans stripped of their constitutional rights - and at least 60 other nations caught in Bush’s bomb-sights - the biggest terrorist threat may be operating not from a cave in Afghanistan, but behind government desks in Washington....
AND NOW THE APOCALYPSE!! Living In A World Full Of Lies: July 2004
or maybe this one:
The page cannot be displayed
Bush and Cheny in intimate business contact with the real prime suspects of the WTC/Pentagon crashbombing frame-up
or this one who quotes his SOURCE as:
list member Dick Eastman– eastman@wolfenet.com
The guy's source is someone else's e-mail address??? "E-mail him. He'll tell ya!"
...She had worked under Bush Senior as head of Russian and East European Affairs. In the speech she said: # ”We need a common enemy to unite us.” # ”We need a new threat as a marker to where we will lead.” # ”Separation of powers is a problem for foreign policy.” These statements were not in response to questions but were in the body of her speech...
What matters?
Come on man.![]()
edited: to add a quote.
Last edited by attaboy; 05-08-2006 at 10:34 PM.
As a rule I try to avoid posting links to obvious right-wing or left-wing websites. Hardly a source for unbiased facts.
OK, I should have crosschecked with another source.
I don't understand how this relates to being a moderator.
If you show me that I posted false info, I'll correct it.
Actually, I cannot find confirmation for the authenticity of the quotes. So ok, I shall be more diligent in future.
I do think the topic-title may be contentious, if you want to have a go at me. I'd change this as soon as someone complains about it.
Last edited by stroller; 05-08-2006 at 10:42 PM.
I'm not having a go. How do we know the quotes are genuine? I googled them and came up with maybe 5 sources for the quote on kook websites or dead links.![]()
As a mod you must give up your child like ways to a certain extent. You need to set the example for the rest of us who are inclined to sink into the mud.![]()
Fekking something!
There's plenty of space for members to post stuff here, and for mods as well.
I made a mistake, I'll be more diligent in future.
That's good to know surasak. Did you find a source for all that big oil offshore of Cuba?
A friend sent me this from the Economist:
When he addressed an end-of-year meeting of Cuba's National Assembly—one of his first public appearances since breaking his knee and arm in a fall—Mr Castro had other victories to report. China has offered cheap loans for an electronics plant and to refurbish crumbling hospitals. It has also shown interest in Cuba's nickel deposits. Two Canadian companies, Pebercan and Sherritt International, have found a small new oilfield off the north-west coast, estimated to contain 100m barrels. The oil is heavy, and must be mixed with lighter imported crude for refining. But officials hope for more discoveries—Spain's Repsol is exploring in deep water in the Gulf of Mexico. Since Mr Castro began giving licences to foreign oil companies in the early 1990s, production has quadrupled to 75,000 b/d.
Cuba's economy | With help from oil and friends | Economist.com
I found this:
Based on onshore and coastal oil reserves of 1 billion barrels, Cuba could sustain production rates of about 50-70,000 b/d of crude oil for the next 20 years.
However, recent U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reports place the North Cuba Basin potential at approximately 5 billion barrerls of undiscovered oil, which could make the island self-sufficient in its oil needs as well as a net exporter.
Focus on Cuba
Estimated cuban oil reserves 1 to 5 billion barrels. Cuban produces 75,000 barrels per day meeting about half it's oil needs. Not much there to work with really. Considering the US produced around 7.9 million barrels per day during 2003. I don't see how our attitude is going to change. Cuba's offshore oil is just a drop in the ocean so to speak.
Perhaps I may ask in turn for members to post comments in the apropriate thread?![]()
![]()
Re: Cuban oil, I saw it on the news the other day.
The question isn't whether or not we'll go for it but whether we'll object to Chinese oil companies getting in on the action while we keep our stupid embargo.
Continue in the Cuba thread, please.
I'd move the posts there, but it would look a bit out of context.
here's rummy ruminating on the civil war in iraq....
for some reasons the link below no longer works so we'll have to make do with a blogger for time magazine.SEC. RUMSFELD: Oh, I don't know. You know, I thought about that last night, and just musing over the words, the phrase, and what constitutes it. If you think of our Civil War, this is really very different. If you think of civil wars in other countries, this is really quite different. There is - there is a good deal of violence in Baghdad and two or three other provinces, and yet in 14 other provinces there's very little violence or numbers of incidents. So it's a - it's a highly concentrated thing. It clearly is being stimulated by people who would like to have what could be characterized as a civil war and win it, but I'm not going to be the one to decide if, when or at all.
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcrip...725-13522.html
Andrew Sullivan | The Daily Dish: The Glibness of Rumsfeld
Last edited by raycarey; 05-08-2006 at 11:56 PM.
Ok, here it is from a 'reliable' source:
"We need a common enemy to unite us."
"Punish France, ignore Germany, and forgive Russia."
Condoleezza Rice Quotes
More about the lying hypocrite:
Conspiring with chimperella:
President Bush, asked whether he regretted his false claim about the uranium, responded by saying there was "no doubt" in his mind that he was right to conquer Iraq.
... Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, said that the president's discredited claim was still technically a true statementFacing criticism over the United States' network of secret prisons in Europe, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pointed out that intelligence gathered from terrorism suspects has helped prevent attacks in not only the United States but Europe as well.Condoleezza Rice was thinking that the tsunami presented a "wonderful opportunity" for the U.S. to make friends in Asia.Rice, Condoleezza (Harpers.org)Rice did appear publicly on 60 Minutes and confirmed Clarke's claim, originally denied by the White House, that on September 12, 2001, President Bush ordered Clarke to focus on possible Iraqi involvement in the 9/11 attacks, which the CIA had already concluded were carried out by Al Qaeda.
Doesn't pass muster.Ok, here it is from a 'reliable' source:
"We need a common enemy to unite us."
"Punish France, ignore Germany, and forgive Russia."
Condoleezza Rice Quotes
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)