Thread: The U.N. Exposed

Originally Posted by surasak

Iraq and Lebanon give proof to the rest of the Muslim world as to why the USA and Israel are not to be trusted.

Pass me that bong dude ... what are you smokin' ? Sounds like you're under the impression the pan-Arab countries can be trusted ? They have a long history of that you know.

Pass me that bong dude ...

Now we're getting somewhere!

Not smoking anything, just asking a general question: if you were the leader of Iran what actions of the past 5 years in the Middle East would lead to some credible evidence that you could place trust in eithe Israel or the USA not to invade?

Do you think a nuclear Iraq would have ever been invaded? What about Lebanon? When was the last time a nation known to have nuclear capability at its disposal was invaded by another sovereign nation?

"Life's a game or so they say
You sometimes win or lose
But even though i'm down right now
I still don't work for Jews"

Terry Jones: Monty Python's Meaning of Life.


"nuclear capability at its disposal was invaded by another sovereign nation?"
In answer to your q. The Jew has the bomb, and in a manner of speaking they see themselves as being invaded by the Hesboshialebanoiraniansyrianites.

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

Strollerrooski,

Did you know that both Jews and Muslims are Semites ?

Why was the UN resolution repealed if it were true ? Why did you ignore that little tidbit in your retort?

"Muslims" doesn't refer to a race, but a religion. Jews and Arabs have the same racial origin, I know. Ironic, isn't it?

The UN repealed the resolution, ok. What does this show? Is this pointing to it being antisemitic, or is it pointing away from that accusation?

The Israeli legal system and rules of citizenship and immigration, however, do strongly indicate racial/religious discrimination, have you looked into this, independent of any UN resolutions?

The UN is not an absolute authority on the truth, but subject to lobbying and vetos, you know?

More people killed by goats than atom bombs, but I don't hear any of you wanting to ban goats.

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

Maybe he got the short of the Cable Tow.

Don't think he's been through them "Pillars"
A pretender...

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

More people killed by goats than atom bombs, but I don't hear any of you wanting to ban goats.

That's because goats are good to eat!

The UN member nations are listed here:
United Nations Information Centres (UNICs) United Nations Information Services (UNISs) United Nations Offices (UNOs)

A summary of the UN's history:
History of the United Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know who the author is but I agree with everything he wrote:


The United Nations is a useless, ineffective, and worthless anti-American, pro-terrorist organization. It has been for years and continues to get worse than better. The only thing they do well is criticize the United States and Israel, spend our money, take bribes, and cover up their sex crimes, bribery and corruption.

The U.N. investigates "alleged human rights violations" of the United States, but ignores the real ones going before their eyes and under their noses all around the world. They "observe" the Hezbollah rockets cruising over the heads of their observers and then fault Israel for saying enough is enough and deciding to stop Hezbollah from killing their citizens. Terrorists blow up men, women, and children every day without a word from the U.N., but let the United States or Israel accidentally kill civilians while defending themselves, and the U.N. wants to conduct war crime trials!

The U.N. investigates and tries to tell the U.S. what to do with our terrorist prisoners, but ignores terrorists as they take our troops and Iraqi citizens prisoner and slowly carve them up alive. They ignore the treatment and abuse of political prisoners around the world, but worry about the United States. They worry about Washington D.C. having a vote, but ignore the billions around the world who have little or no real vote! The worry about the death penalty in the U.S. and ignore the terrorist killings and those of dictators around the world!

The U.S. should withdraw as much funding and support as possible, down to the absolute minimum. Unfortunately, for now, the U.S. can not afford to withdraw totally from the U.N. -- until it is disbanded and perhaps replaced with a new, more effective, pro-American organization.
The U.S. MUST REMAIN in the U.N. for ONE REASON. The United States must retain the VETO power we have as a permanent member of the Security Council.

That VETO power is the only means we have to stop the U.N. from actually declaring war, or taking other actions against the United States, Israel, or other nations friendly to us and we can't afford to lose that. Look at what happened to North Korea when Russia walked out -- the Korean War!

In the meantime, as we cut our support for the U.N., we need to look at working on another organization or coalition to replace it.

I don't always agree with you, SK, but I agree that the UN has lost the plot.
It screwed up Cambodia, is screwing up just about every African country it tries to help and will continue screwing up for as long as it tries to intervene wherever there's a bad guy killing a few helpless farmers or peasants.

What about regional assemblies with teeth? The European Union is strong enough to form a single army and give it the bollocks to go and sort out any trouble that starts to affect European life. This could probably have prevented all the shit in Yugoslavia. The Africans are sort of trying to do this with the African Union (though I'm not sure they're allowed to fight).

The problem with the UN is that key countries have a veto when it comes to military action. The only successful Security Council resolution that has been carried through was the intervention in Korea. And look how successful the follow up to that has been!

Store Keeper, how many times do I need to remind you to mention the sources for your copy/pasting?

Btw, it's another highly biased opinion piece, but I can't be arsed to comment further.

Originally Posted by stroller

Store Keeper, how many times do I need to remind you to mention the sources for your copy/pasting?

Btw, it's another highly biased opinion piece, but I can't be arsed to comment further.

Do you have a problem today ? I mentioned in the very first line I didn't know who the author was. Maybe you're fucking high or something ?

That guys opinion is no more biased than any opinion you express. Everything you express seems to be tainted by your gay, pacifist disposition.

Yes, I'm a little irritated, let me rephrase it:

Have you typed the text yourself?
Or where does it originate from?

Originally Posted by stroller

Store Keeper, how many times do I need to remind you to mention the sources for your copy/pasting?

Btw, it's another highly biased opinion piece, but I can't be arsed to comment further.

Strange. He gets onto others for failing to quote sources or links. No source or author but he has a source for the text to copy and paste it? LMAO.

This was so good I think it needs to be bumped for Strollers sake.

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

I don't know who the author is but I agree with everything he wrote:

The United Nations is a useless, ineffective, and worthless anti-American, pro-terrorist organization. It has been for years and continues to get worse than better. The only thing they do well is criticize the United States and Israel, spend our money, take bribes, and cover up their sex crimes, bribery and corruption.

The U.N. investigates "alleged human rights violations" of the United States, but ignores the real ones going before their eyes and under their noses all around the world. They "observe" the Hezbollah rockets cruising over the heads of their observers and then fault Israel for saying enough is enough and deciding to stop Hezbollah from killing their citizens. Terrorists blow up men, women, and children every day without a word from the U.N., but let the United States or Israel accidentally kill civilians while defending themselves, and the U.N. wants to conduct war crime trials!

The U.N. investigates and tries to tell the U.S. what to do with our terrorist prisoners, but ignores terrorists as they take our troops and Iraqi citizens prisoner and slowly carve them up alive. They ignore the treatment and abuse of political prisoners around the world, but worry about the United States. They worry about Washington D.C. having a vote, but ignore the billions around the world who have little or no real vote! The worry about the death penalty in the U.S. and ignore the terrorist killings and those of dictators around the world!

The U.S. should withdraw as much funding and support as possible, down to the absolute minimum. Unfortunately, for now, the U.S. can not afford to withdraw totally from the U.N. -- until it is disbanded and perhaps replaced with a new, more effective, pro-American organization.
The U.S. MUST REMAIN in the U.N. for ONE REASON. The United States must retain the VETO power we have as a permanent member of the Security Council.

That VETO power is the only means we have to stop the U.N. from actually declaring war, or taking other actions against the United States, Israel, or other nations friendly to us and we can't afford to lose that. Look at what happened to North Korea when Russia walked out -- the Korean War!

In the meantime, as we cut our support for the U.N., we need to look at working on another organization or coalition to replace it.

^

Originally Posted by Storekeeper

I don't know who the author is....

Blogs for Bush: The White House Of The Blogosphere: We Should Withdraw From The U.N.

^ It still doesn't tell me who the author is.

"Nearly everywhere the UN sets up shop prostitution, brothels, and forced sexual slavery springs up to "service" the UN peacekeepers and officials. These UN officials appear to use their positions with the UN as an excuse to indulge in illicit sex romps with as many underage women (and boys) as possible.

It has happened most recently in the Congo but has also happened in Kosovo, Thailand, South America and a host of other places about the globe. Crimes like this perpetrated by UN officials are not just isolated incidents and reveal a culture or depredations the world over."

The UN's Sex Criminals

Do you work for the UN stroller ?

Sounds like they are no better than the US army, but at least the UN don't eat no babies.

A few personal attacks have been deleted.

Originally Posted by stroller

Sounds like they are no better than the US army, but at least the UN don't eat no babies.

Funny you don't view this as a personal attack since you asked me the same question when you redded me on my repo.

Other posters may not recognize it ... but you and I both know you intend this as a personal attack directed at me.

I'm pretty much convinced at this point that you are the same poster "unwell" over on ajarn. That pretty much means you are not capable of moderating.

Do I need to post the the supporting link from Dick Cheney every time I tell you to "Fuck Off" ...?

You do not dictate the parameters of moderating here.

Your definition of "personal attack" are extremely broad when it concerns anything which could be construed against you and are up in arms.

What do make of this:

The UN's Sex Criminals
Do you work for the UN stroller ?

Or the last paragraphs of your last post?
And you don't hesitate to call others "mother-fucker".

Your double standards are very dishonest.

Originally Posted by Stroller

Your double standards are very dishonest.

Obviously our good old StoreKeeper is an American and on top of it he is in the Navy.

All I know for sure is that you wrote the same comment on my repo. I don't have double standards. I just think you're a phony. I think most liberals are phony.