Page 45 of 128 FirstFirst ... 3537383940414243444546474849505152535595 ... LastLast
Results 1,101 to 1,125 of 3199
  1. #1101
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    This pretty much sums up the current state of the US...




  2. #1102
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    Will the Fed buy US Treasuries bills?
    Yep, they just printed $1 Trillion yesterday to do so. (Told you so ) Get your money outta greenbacks, Honey.
    Where's Spin and BKK Andrew when you need 'em?

  3. #1103
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    Will the Fed buy US Treasuries bills?
    Yep, they just printed $1 Trillion yesterday to do so. (Told you so ) Get your money outta greenbacks, Honey.
    Where's Spin and BKK Andrew when you need 'em?
    I agree, Jet. The US Dollar is going to take a beating today on Friday, March 20, 2009.

    Below is an article by John Kenneth Galbraih that is only a preview of the entire article. It's worth the browse. Galbraith notes even if the Stimulus creates some government jobs unemployment and low/no lending by banks many continue for years:

    No Return to Normal

    President Obama has predicted that the stimulus package will revive the economy b
    y next year. Recent upticks in housing starts and stock prices give some hope to that view. There are many other reasons, however, to fear that in this economic crisis, the worst is yet to come.

    In the cover story of the upcoming March/April issue of the Washington Monthly, economist James K. Galbraith makes the case for a much darker picture of what's in store. He begins by questioning an assumption held by nearly all modern economists, including those around Obama: that economies are naturally self-stabilizing, and therefore that economic slumps can be righted with relatively modest, short-term nudges from government. That idea fits the experience of every post-War recession. But what if the current crisis is less like those downturns and more like the Great Depression, when the economy famously failed to return to normal? In that case, the actions that official Washington has taken are bound to be woefully inadequate to the challenge.

    If Galbraith is right, tens of millions more Americans will be out of work in a year or two or five, even if the stimulus creates all the jobs the president expects. Banks will not resume significant lending for years, no matter how much money the Treasury pours into them. And the economy will not recover for many years to come, until the balance sheets of average American households are rebuilt.

    Based on these conclusions, Galbraith lays out an agenda that establishment Washington can hardly bring itself to contemplate, but had better start thinking about--from creating millions of government jobs for the unemployed to increasing entitlement spending.


    A sneak preview of Galbraith's article, "No Return to Normal," is available here.
    Link: No Return to Normal - James K. Galbraith
    ............

  4. #1104
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    ^ You got a cockle shell trading island we can go to, Milkie?

  5. #1105
    ding ding ding
    Spin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,606
    Quote Originally Posted by John Kenneth Galbraih
    Recent upticks in housing starts and stock prices give some hope to that view
    Sorry, the uptick in housing he mentions were condonimium projects. It figures that folks without the money for houses may be forced into condo living. That isnt an uptick in the housing industry that anybody in their right mind would attribute to some kind of bottom or recovery.
    The uptick in the markets has been swift but is running out of steam right now. Well off the lows, by something in the region of 17%, the trend will continue down. I got short yesterday at 800 spx and will enjoy the ride down to new lows.
    The worse is yet to come, those are the words of Meredith Whitney, one of the few commentators who's talk isnt cheap.
    Originally Posted by Smeg
    ... I like to fantasise sometimes, and I lie very occasionally... my superior home, job, wealth, freedom, car, girl, retirement age, appearance, satisfaction with birth country etc etc... Over the past few years I have put together over 100 pages on notes on thaiophilia...

  6. #1106
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    20-10-2012 @ 04:24 PM
    Posts
    7,959
    Devaluing the $US and inflating away debt is going to be a tricky balancing act for Obama. Because the $US has become as much a commodity as it is a currency (all be it a "pseudo" commodity), international investment in the $US has forced its value unnaturally much higher than it should be.

    The $US dropped in value today between 3 and 4 % against all the major currencies. Gold and oil are both up. But how do you control such a shift in todays market conditions where investors are easily spooked and may cause a panic dumping of the $US? Time will tell whether Obama can manage a steady decline or it will turn into a stampede out of the $US.

  7. #1107
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    ^ Here is a report stating the basics of econ that most of us us. This channel/station tends to be gloomy towards the US. Nevertheless, it's short:


  8. #1108
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    Russia and France are the leaders of the currency base change, right? To what, the euro (I heard many ME countries are doing trade in euros already).

    ^^^Spin, I fear you are right. The markets are so bladdy fickle right now, and they sure as fek didn't like that 90% bonus payment tax or Geithner's ongoing inability to sort out this mess. I am starting to feel sorry for the guy. He really needs some Wall Streeters with him, but bambam et al have shot themselves in the foot over this coz the people would protest if a big banker was put in an exec Treas position.

  9. #1109
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    20-10-2012 @ 04:24 PM
    Posts
    7,959
    Changing the worlds reserve/trading currency to the Euro would be just as stupid as continuing with the $US. No individual country or currency bloc should have the ability to print their way out of debt.
    It has long been proposed by many economists that the worlds trading currency should consist of a basket of currencies plus some precious metals. Just how they would put such a world currency together will be interesting to see. The only certain thing is that it is way overdue.

  10. #1110
    In transit to Valhalla

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    5,036
    Why is that Panda ? surely there is a much greater security against the Euro ending up like the Dollar, the much more conservative economies in Europe would never allow the creation of Euro bonds not based on real value, the members of the Euro is by treaty forced to stay within certain inflation levels and currency values and thus cannot issue bonds or print Euros like they want it would take a lot of very different minded economies to agree on this.

    Just like some of the the old Euro economies just now refuse to make any more big stimulus plans even though the US and England are asking them to.

    What do you think about these sentiments ?

  11. #1111
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Unemployment (U3) is inching up. Oregon and Nevada now have U3 rates of 10% unemployment.

    California’s Unemployment Rate Rises to 26-Year High (Update1)

    By Bob Willis
    March 20 (Bloomberg) -- California’s jobless rate surged in February to the highest level since 1983 while unemployment in Oregon and Nevada climbed above 10 percent for the first time in more than two decades.


    Unemployment in California rose to 10.5 percent from 10.1 percent in January, its Employment Development Department reported today in Sacramento. Neighboring Oregon’s jobless rate rose a full percentage point to 10.8 percent, and Nevada’s increased to 10.1 percent.



    “The West Coast is more heavily dependent on real estate and the decline there has been more pronounced” than in the rest of the U.S., said Sung Won-Sohn, an economics professor at California State University-Channel Islands in Camarillo, California. “We are not seeing any signs of stabilization in the job market.”
    Unemployment across the nation may top 9 percent by the end of the year, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg, and it could go higher. The national jobless rate rose to 8.1 last month, the highest in more than a quarter century, and the economy has lost 4.4 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007.



    At least 19 states have so far reported individual employment figures for February. The rest of the states will be reporting through the end of next week and the Labor Department in Washington will collate the figures on March 27.

    Link & Entire: California’s Unemployment Rate Rises to 26-Year High (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

  12. #1112
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    20-10-2012 @ 04:24 PM
    Posts
    7,959
    Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr View Post
    Why is that Panda ? surely there is a much greater security against the Euro ending up like the Dollar, the much more conservative economies in Europe would never allow the creation of Euro bonds not based on real value, the members of the Euro is by treaty forced to stay within certain inflation levels and currency values and thus cannot issue bonds or print Euros like they want it would take a lot of very different minded economies to agree on this.

    Just like some of the the old Euro economies just now refuse to make any more big stimulus plans even though the US and England are asking them to.

    What do you think about these sentiments ?
    One of the main problems of having just one countries/ blocs currency as the worlds default trading currency is that it becomes a sought after commodity to stash away just like gold used to be. That increases demand and forces the value up to unnatural levels out of balance with productivity or debt.
    The best way to avoid such an abnormal demand would be to spread the new world trading currency across as many stable currencies as possible. That way it would be virtually impossible for investors to distort the value of any one subordinate currency. Throw in gold as well to keep the playing field even more level.

    Using the Euro as the worlds default trading currency wouldn't be good for the EU unless they had a lot of surplus productivity to absorb the expected demand for Euros or were prepared to borrow to sustain their economy, as an abnormally strong Euro would price them out of a lot of markets. Same, same USA right now.

  13. #1113
    I am in Jail

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    22-11-2011 @ 08:27 AM
    Location
    Christian Country
    Posts
    15,017
    ^ Gold star for the lesson, Panda.

  14. #1114
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    38,456
    Very true Panda. One of the reasons that the USD has been stronger than it 'should have been' since the crisis is demand- banks worldwide were pulling in USD's to sure up their capital ratio's. The reserve currency has to be changed to a more representative measure, something I've maintained for years actually. It was fine for the US when it was the lions share of the worlds international trading economy- it is not now.

    One of the reasons for the recent weakness of the USD is said to be divestment by China- it is gradually altering it's foreign reserves towards a more representative, rather than USD based currency profile. Allegedly. (these things are of necessity kept quiet). Apparently, it is divesting longer dated T bonds and buying shorter term instruments, as well as hard commodities.

    As far as the current scare about printing money, I'd just like to put this in perspective. Of course, the first concern expressed is that printing money is inflationery- some quarters are even panicing about hyper-inflation. Very few in serious economic circles are though. The concern at the moment is staving off Deflation- which would lead to a deep, prolonged recession considerably worse than we have yet. Right now the concern is deflation, not inflation.

  15. #1115
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 01:02 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    35,398
    Enjoying reading all the comments. Maybe I'll learn something. Being an engineer type guy, seems to me the USD value will depend a lot upon how much other nations "print money" to stem economic down turn in their countries. It's all relative isn't?

  16. #1116
    In transit to Valhalla

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    5,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Panda View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr View Post
    Why is that Panda ? surely there is a much greater security against the Euro ending up like the Dollar, the much more conservative economies in Europe would never allow the creation of Euro bonds not based on real value, the members of the Euro is by treaty forced to stay within certain inflation levels and currency values and thus cannot issue bonds or print Euros like they want it would take a lot of very different minded economies to agree on this.

    Just like some of the the old Euro economies just now refuse to make any more big stimulus plans even though the US and England are asking them to.

    What do you think about these sentiments ?
    One of the main problems of having just one countries/ blocs currency as the worlds default trading currency is that it becomes a sought after commodity to stash away just like gold used to be. That increases demand and forces the value up to unnatural levels out of balance with productivity or debt.
    The best way to avoid such an abnormal demand would be to spread the new world trading currency across as many stable currencies as possible. That way it would be virtually impossible for investors to distort the value of any one subordinate currency. Throw in gold as well to keep the playing field even more level.

    Using the Euro as the worlds default trading currency wouldn't be good for the EU unless they had a lot of surplus productivity to absorb the expected demand for Euros or were prepared to borrow to sustain their economy, as an abnormally strong Euro would price them out of a lot of markets. Same, same USA right now.
    Thanks Panda I understand better now, so why not just use gold again then ? sorry for all the questions

  17. #1117
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 01:02 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    35,398
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton
    It's all relative isn't?
    Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr
    so why not just use gold again then ?
    Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr
    sorry for all the questions
    It's OK they love it. Especially on a slow Sunday afternoon.

  18. #1118
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    20-10-2012 @ 04:24 PM
    Posts
    7,959
    Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr View Post

    Thanks Panda I understand better now, so why not just use gold again then ? sorry for all the questions
    Probably because there is not enough of the stuff to go around.

    Some interesting stats in Wiki.

    "Gold reserves (or gold holdings) are held by central banks as a store of value. In 2001, it was estimated that all the gold ever mined totaled 145,000 tonnes.[1] One tonne of gold equated to a value of US$30.27 million as of February 14, 2009 ($941.35/troy ounces)[2]. The total value of all gold ever mined would be US$4.39 trillion at that price.[note 1]

    Official gold reserves - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I recall reading somewhere that if gold was to replace paper money for trade its value would have to increase to about $25,000 an ounce. Not sure if thats right, but sounds reasonable.

    People are already buying gold that doesn't exist, except on paper.

  19. #1119
    In transit to Valhalla

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    5,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Panda View Post

    People are already buying gold that doesn't exist, except on paper.
    Thanks again.
    Yes I think we had something about that in this thread before, more gold being sold that recorded mined gold, and to stay away from that, and only buy gold you actually can hold in your hand.

  20. #1120
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    I'm sure sabang would agree with Pelosi...

    John Hinderaker asks: "Are we a banana republic?"

    Wells Fargo didn't want any TARP money, but the government forced it to take more than $5 billion worth, so Wells Fargo employees who receive bonuses would be subject to Pelosi's proposed tax. Say you're a teller at Wells Fargo and you're married to a lawyer who makes $250,000 this year. You get a $10,000 bonus for your good work during 2008. The government steals it all (90 percent federal plus 8.5 percent state plus, unless it's included in the 90 percent, 3 percent Medicare). That is simply insane.

    If the Pelosi bill is actually enacted into law (which I still think is doubtful) and upheld by the courts, there is no limit to the arbitrary power of Congress. In that event, we have no property rights and there is no Constitution—no equal protection clause, no due process clause, no impairment of contracts clause, no bill of attainder/ex post facto law clause. Instead, we are living in a majoritarian tyranny.
    A Deplorable Bitter Clinger

  21. #1121
    ding ding ding
    Spin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,606
    Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr
    so why not just use gold again then ?
    Some are.....


  22. #1122
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Informal poll:

    How many job losses will there be for the month of March, 2009?

    Less than 250,000?

    250-499,000?

    Over 500,000?

    Over 600,000?

    Over 650,000 jobs lost in March 2009?

    More than 4.4 million Americans have lost their jobs since the recession started in December 2007 and more than 12.5 million are currently out of work. The Labor Department reported that 651,000 people lost their jobs in February, an 8.1% increase from the prior month.

    This is the third straight month where 650,000 or more jobs have been lost. Monthly U.S. job losses have more than doubled since the fall of Lehman Brothers on Sept. 15, 2009.

    Here are the staggering numbers:
    Month Total job losses Unemployment rate

    September 2008 321,000 6.2%
    October 2008 380,000 6.6%
    November 2008 597,000 6.8%
    December 2008 681,000 7.2%

    January 2009 655,000 7.6%

    February 2009 651,000 8.1%
    Prediction: Job losses will hit 650,000 or more in March. The Labor Department will report preliminary numbers for March 2009 on April 3, which will be used to judge this prediction.
    Link: Over 650,000 jobs lost in March 2009? | The Industry Standard

  23. #1123
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Here is a summary on the potential effects of the increase in the money supply, deflation & possible inflation and hyper-inflation.


  24. #1124
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    The Strongest Enonomy...heh

    The London Times itemizes some of the earmarks in the Democrats' recent omnibus appropriation bill:
    - Removing tattoos from gang members (California): $200,000
    - Polynesian Voyaging Society (Hawaii): $238,000
    - Swine odour and manure management (Iowa): $2m
    - Preserving Lahontan cut-throat trout (Nevada): $250,000
    - Stable fly control (Nebraska): $866,000
    - Blackbird management (North Dakota): $265,000
    - Encouraging teenagers to abstain from sex (Pennsylvania): $24,000

  25. #1125
    Banned Muadib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    4,774
    MM, I predict over 600K jobs loses for March 2009...

    On another note, was watching Bill Maher last night and the topic of Glenn Beck came up... Every one on the panel tarred GB with the same brush, including Madeline Albright... In a single word, he's 'nutz'...

Page 45 of 128 FirstFirst ... 3537383940414243444546474849505152535595 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •