
Yep, believe what the press spoon feeds you, brother.

I would never disagree about this being an open forum and you have every right to state your opinions, the thing is your opinions rarely have any substance or are they backed by facts, they are usually full of words that do nothing more than show your ignorance "rabid- bible thumpers" you obviosly have 0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive is all about, but hey thats great I enjoy the humor I get from your ignorance. Keep up the name calling.
Chistian Fundamentalist should be shot, period. They are as dangerous as the Islamist terrorists,

^ I would say the same about libbie Kool-Aid drinkers.

I do have some knowledge and am not really that interested in their rantings, do you have in-depth knowledge? If that's your game then go for it and believe their clap-trap.Originally Posted by RPETER65
Move back in time and close the windows and then your eyes, teach creationism and ignore science . . . if it makes you a better person
c'mon PH, it's not called 'creationism' anymore, it's been re-branded as 'intelligent design'.![]()

Damnation . . . may hellfire be stoked and lightning bolts cascade over the horizon to deal the death-knell to all unbelievers.
Intelligent design . . . was that before or after RPETER65 started attending book-burning sessions?



^ They remain staunch lefties.
God banished our convict ancestors from the third of Betelgeus' five planets to the new penal colony now known as earth. She told me so.![]()
>0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive<
the radical christians are not conservative .. they are religious radical nut cases.
in their best Rovian fashion the religious radicals use words to describe them selves that are totally inappropriate.
terrorist acts: bombing abortion clinics. Sarah refused to call bombing abortion clinics terrorism.
christians are vehement supports of the zionist terrorism on palestinians.
(zion is integral to rapture)
nut cases that want their mystical beliefs to be the policy of america.
the environment or women's health care or foreign policy .. they want goofy mystical beliefs to determine policy
a believer in rapture with a finger on the bomb is a scary thing.
IMHO, public officials need to take a test;
1. did 2 kangaroos hop (.. or 2 buffalo or 2 S. American sloths) to Mess-o-potamia 4000 years ago?
2. was the grand canyon (at 8000') eroded in a short period of time by Noah's flood?
3. did man and dinosaurs co-exist .. = was the flintsones movie a documentary.
give a stupid answer to those questions & you cannot hold public office.
as long as there are tests, there will be prayers in public schools.
US political pondering: what % of CO2 deniers are also birthers who believe kangaroos walked to the ark

You can find radicals in any sect of society, most conservative christians are not nearly as radical as you and the rest of the libtards in this forum, most are peace loving, conservative people. The problem is there is such a strong movement against them.
Is murdering unborn babies less disgusting than bombing the people who are doing the murdering, not that I personally advocate either one.
yeah, you have missing quite a few thingsOriginally Posted by RPETER65

Radical anything can be explosive, but then how do you determine what is radical? Are the Amish or Hutterites radical? They are fundamentalists, but I would hardly call them radical in the sense that they would never hurt or harm anyone intentionally. Mormons are peace-loving, but still have the stigma of polygamy about them, especially as some of their offshoots still practise it. Better than Iranians who have laws that men can marry nine-year-old girls, tho.

I guess if indoctrination and hiding behind rocks is knowledge then you have the upper hand . . .Originally Posted by RPETER65
And I am neither your freind (sic) nor your friend . . . we wouldn't have too much to talk about, would we . . .


Please explain the spelling and the parentheses;Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

^ A word quoted from the title of one of your threads in the Lounge. *sic* is usually added in parens. I take it you do understand what *sic* means, hatter. The silence from your side after all this time (as I add this extra info for you) indicates you must be doing an ignore to this post or maybe trying to resurrect your business?
Last edited by Jet Gorgon; 13-11-2008 at 01:18 PM.
childish and pedantic one upmanship i reckon.Originally Posted by panama hat
>murdering unborn babies<
like it or not that is a religious position, giving the status of life to something that is attached to & relies on the mother for life..
no point in arguing the zygote vs fetus vs living entity..
this is an issue of the evangelicals .. similar to virgin birth, return from the dead, kangaroos hopping over the Himalayas (or did they swim the Indian ocean) .. or the the grand canyon idiocy. .
if the question of life was the only point of idiocy evangelicals support it would be different ..
face it: evangelicals do not let facts or science or logic or common sense come in the way of their goofy mystical beliefs
I care not about your stupid myths .. just do not try to deny my daughters health care or education.
When your mystical beliefs interfere with my family's welfare then your goofiness becomes the enemy of my family .. & must be exposed & ridiculed .. & denied all status in society.
keep your goofy beliefs in your church, bedroom or closet .. & outa my f'n life.
evangelicals tend to be angry people that want to dominate those that do not submit to their fantasies.
how many smiling happy people were at sarah's events? .. at the republican convention?
"So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence." - Bertrand Russell.
> like Reverend Wright? You counting radical Muslims and Jews<
i definitely understand ..or have empathy .. for where the reverend wright is coming from .. he was speaking as a negro in a religious setting.
jews: the orthodox jews are a main problem in the mideast. Do not forget the zionist bombed the brit military headquarters in the late 30s in-order to get the brits to back down from the brit mandate of the early 20s.
militant muslims are mainly reacting to the zionists (bin laudins prime reason for 9-11) & americas blind support for their biblical land grant of palestine.
IMHO: if the us walked from isreal many of our problems would disappear
my ex-wife would be much more attractive in a burka (she'd have a tie dyed or loud flower print burka!.. she would now require a XXXXL) .. ummm, a burka with an intergral gag ball..


Nothing to resurrect, it's doing ok. Not brilliant yet, just ok.
On the contrary, I was wondering why you had misspelled a word and then used (sic) afterwards. A simple question, not meant to disparage you or what you wrote, just trying to figure out what you meant to imply.
I'm still not clear, but if you'd care to explain I'd be happy to answer your questions.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)