yeah, there's nothing worse than the smell of old people.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
yeah, there's nothing worse than the smell of old people.Originally Posted by Mr Earl
Agree, but in the minds of some, McCain's age could put a higher significance on his VP pick.Originally Posted by chinthee
Yep. This is one of the reason she was chosen. A young Washington outsider to help bring change to a broken government.Originally Posted by Mr Earl

^Well, in that case, the VP is a relatively inexperienced woman whose main claim to fame is being the major of a small town in the least populated state in the Union. Oh, yes, she is also governor of the largest landmass state, with a population of something like 600,000.
Not impressive.
It kinda looks like Obama was forced to pick an old man as counterbalance, and McCain was forced to pick a young woman.
Nonsense generally for both.
Politics makes strange bed fellows. This being the case, McCain made a much better choice than Obama.Originally Posted by chinthee
![]()

There is that but don't you think you're being a bit trivial here.....
Actually my post was tongue in cheek for the most part..I really do feel your pain, really I do..
But really the flip side to this is that Obama doesn't have any more experience and on some issues even less. So bottom line is would you rather have the person with the most experience be second in line with the time to gain more experience with only a hypothetical worst case scenerio a possibility? Or would you rather have the least experienced person voted directly into office with no time for seasoning right off the bat?
I think I'd have to opt for the hypothetical worst case scenerio under the current world conditions..
Last edited by DrivingForce; 30-08-2008 at 08:38 PM.
Be honest - you don't need really much experience to be president - you have a legion of advisers that do most of the work for you. So in reality this really has little relevance whether you are talking Obama or Pavin.
As for Obama vs Putin - Obama is soft as a marshmallow Putin would eat him alive. Not so sure about Pavin - read somewhere that alaska is littered with bodies of her opponents who crossed her. I doubt they would say that if she wasn't tough as nails.
nid aur yw popeth melyn

^Good point. Reagan was a great President without much between the ears. But, he was tough. Obama is worryingly concessionary. But remember, the VP doesn't traditionally call the shots in foreign policy. In fact, prior to Cheney, the Secretary of State was the most powerful shaper of foreign policy.
hmmm.....funny how brit never posted this about obama.Originally Posted by britmaveric
and this is based on?Originally Posted by britmaveric
link?Originally Posted by britmaveric
The Most Popular Governor
Just said it about Obama above Ray...![]()
I was being a bit tongue in cheek also but McCain's age is an issue for many voters just as is Obama's color or his lack of experience. I personally think McCain is not going to drop dead in the near future but trivial as it may seem to you and I, it is far from trivial to many. To them her qualification to be President is a real concern. Republican party is well aware of this and has been using the fact she is the commander in chief of the Alaska National Guard as a qualification.Originally Posted by DrivingForce
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"

Norton, you're correct, and even more so, there is a 'perception' and expectation that the President be a vibrant man. Reagan managed to keep up that impression with hair dye, a great smile and engaging style. He was also beloved as a decent B movie actor (Bedtime for Bonzo?) He was also a master at controlling his situations. He never got in over his head.
McCain has none of those skills, so his age is out there for all to see. It's more exposed this time.
It's a problem.
errrr.....brit......that's the point.Originally Posted by britmaveric
now that mccain has chosen someone with very, very, thin credentials, suddenly you've decided that experience doesn't matter.
Yeah but she has more credentials then Obama - he spent most of his senate career running for president.![]()
laughable....but why is that surprising?Originally Posted by britmaveric

^^True, true. Anyone who has run an organization, whether it be as Mayor, Governor, or CEO has much more broad experience than someone who has spent his time orating in the Senate. Agree in full.
That's why Bill Clinton was qualified.
^ This is why its very hard to elect a Senator or congress person for President. Normally it seems to go to past governors.

This was my point above, take a president that has experience now with a second in command on the learning curve (and with a potential future for the party I might add) or go with a complete newbie with even less practical experience who has to face the current world environment right out of the box and who has a VP that has no potential future for the party?
so by this 'logic', palin should be at the top of the ticket and mccain her VP.Originally Posted by chinthee

^Don't be silly ray. A person is the sum total of his experience, education, ability and presence. Driving Force said it best in the post above yours.
approx. 18 months ago this woman was mayor of a town of 6,500 people.
The Associated Press: McCain chooses Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for V.P.
and now she's going to be one heartbeat away from the presidency....she has absolutely no experience in foreign affairs, as of one month ago, had no idea of what the VP position entails.
But who actually picked this person. McCain admits that he hardly knows her having met once at a govorners conference last february. The next contact was a phone conversation where he offered her the position.
Seems to be a case of profiling. McCain is old we need someone young. McCain is a man we need a woman. McCain is soft on abortion we need a pro life bible basher.
Did they run a thousand names through a computer and this on popped out ?
here's an interesting piece of trivia....
Alter: Why Sarah Palin Is Likely to Belly-Flop | Newsweek Politics: Conventions | Newsweek.comGovernors often run for president, but only after many months of prep work on what they might confront in the White House. The last governor chosen for vice president was Spiro Agnew in 1968, and he was the governor of Maryland, which is right over the line from Washington, D.C., not thousands of miles away. Veep candidates with extensive Washington experience like Geraldine Ferraro and Dan Quayle were nonetheless grilled on policy and proved a drag on the ticket when they looked unpresidential.
Ok...be gentle please!
I personally think Palin is the perfect choice considering her background. Here's why!
Simple management experience! The only difference between between managing a small town and managing the country is the concept of scale.
She was apparently able to "scale up" her thinking from a small town to a small state. The same concept applies to moving up from a state to a country. Personally, I think she brings something that none of the others have...a simple dose of common sense.
And if she unbuttons that second button on her top, she'll be the focus of the attention of every male in America.

CSF, very good post. Being a leader, and being responsible for people - the same dynamics are involved with leading 10 as leading 100,000. You still have to develop leadership and delegation skills, and the good ones are self evident.
An advocate, a Senator, an MP, a Congressman, though they may be great thinkers and orators - they are not trained leaders of organizations.
Yup.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)