Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    04-02-2026 @ 07:10 AM
    Posts
    6,950

    New Building 7 Collapse Video Clearly Shows Demolition



    In its latest report, the National Institute of Standards and Technology attempted to once and for all put to rest the evidence that the building was taken down via demolition by explaining that fires had caused the collapse. Specifically, NIST claimed “thermal expansion” had brought about the collapse. As Trish Stevens notes, the NIST report “is contrary to all historical, visual, and physical evidence, according to an independent worldwide organization composed of more than 470 engineers and architects. WTC-7 was a 47-story skyscraper located more than a football field away from the North Tower and was not hit by any airplane, yet completely collapsed hours after the Twin Towers fell in a similar manner.”
    Dr. Steven Jones says there is “an abundance of evidence which NIST refuses to look at or even account for that clearly points to controlled demolition as the source that destroyed these buildings.”
    As the new video clearly reveals, the center supporting columns of the 47-story building were taken out, allowing the building to collapse into its footprint in a symmetrical, straight down fashion. “This is controlled demolition,” averred demolitions expert Danny Jowenko in 2006. “A team of experts did this. This is professional work, without any doubt.”

    Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
    You bullied, you laughed, you lied, you lost!

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat jandajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Online
    02-11-2016 @ 08:50 AM
    Posts
    19,595
    But why would they do it. Insurance ?

  3. #3
    Hello World
    melvbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Infinite Loop
    Posts
    5,850
    Dont know where I missed it but I cant see it clearly showing demolition, it looks like all the other videos to me. Nothing new.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    40,667
    Quote Originally Posted by jandajoy
    Insurance ?
    WTC7 was an aging building, and insured for more than it's market value- not however for more than it's replacement cost. It's particular, old style construction meant it would have been an expensive nightmare to take down, especially being surrounded by tall buildings. Basically, it would have had to be dismantled rather than demolished. So financially at least, it's coming down was good news for Larry Silverstein.

    It also housed the Mayors disaster relief operations, an investigative wing of the SEC that was conducting major insider trading investigations (which died with the collapse), and a large secret service office.

    I am convinced the building was pulled, and the question is why the US government wishes to cover this up. I suspect the answers are to be found in an informal alliance involving the factors above. And one more thing- the demolition explosives could not have been placed there on the day of 911, there was no time. So admitting a controlled demo would be tantamount to admitting some people had foreknowledge of the event. Some people did, certainly the Mossad operatives seen dancing and cheering on Jersey side as they watched it unfold, from a Tradesmans van. They were detained, and quietly deported.

  5. #5
    punk douche bag
    ChiangMai noon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    o dan y bryn
    Posts
    29,256
    Quote Originally Posted by sabang
    I am convinced the building was pulled
    likewise, but according to experts planning for and placing the explosives in a building this large would take months.

    that is all very suspicious.

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    04-02-2026 @ 07:10 AM
    Posts
    6,950
    Don't recall posting it in the religious section?.

    Anyone who believes the way that that fell was caused by fire are simply nuts. You don't need to be an engineer to work it out.

    I'd love to see someone try and bring an old dissused building down in the same way. It just wouldn't happen, near enough impossible. But i guess only in America for 3 miracles to happen on the same day with a few hours.

  7. #7
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,826
    Quote Originally Posted by sabang
    I am convinced the building was pulled, and the question is why the US government wishes to cover this up. I suspect the answers are to be found in an informal alliance involving the factors above.
    The Secret Service office was maybe where the planning of the whole 911 scam was taking place, hence the need to destroy all evidence. There is also the mention of Saudi Gold, will need to read more about this.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
    likewise, but according to experts planning for and placing the explosives in a building this large would take months.
    Of course it was all planned, but who did it ? not the terrorists for sure, not smart enough and no enough funding to carry that kind of operations. Must be Mossad with rogue section of Pentagon. This 911 thing might as well be a coup to remove GW Bush the imbecile, he was probably the last one to know

    look at his speech the next day, very different from what he did a few months later.

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    04-02-2026 @ 07:10 AM
    Posts
    6,950

    Ex-CIA Man Warned Top Executives To Leave New York On 9/11

    According to a report by Jeremy R. Hammond of the Foreign Policy Journal, senior executives of a major U.S. corporation were warned by a former CIA operative to leave New York on September 11, 2001, the latest smoking gun to add to a bulging stack of examples concerning specific prior knowledge of the attacks.
    The article cites an anonymous source who worked under a managing director as number two at a European branch of the media giant Warner Bros. The source’s boss was close friends with a senior executive who worked at the head office in L.A. and had also formerly worked for the CIA.
    During the memorial arrangements for a senior director from a foreign office who had died, the L.A. executive rejected September 11th as a date for the service because “something big is happening that day” and the top executives from the New York office would all be traveling out of the city.
    When asked further about this big event, the executive replied that it was a confidential matter and disclosed no further details, except to say that it was “not corporate”.
    The source told the Journal, “I had no reason to think that the ‘event’ could be anything more than perhaps a junket, an out of town think tank exercise or whatever – I remember that these possibilities ran through my mind.”

    Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

  9. #9
    Hello World
    melvbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Infinite Loop
    Posts
    5,850
    That footage was actually shot on a massive back lot in Hollywood. It was faked by the looks of it.

  10. #10
    Dislocated Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    The thin ice of modern life.
    Posts
    3,745
    Clearly it is a controlled explosion.

    Why?

    2 things. Firstly the manner in which it collapses and secondly that if it was fire that caused the collapse the smoke and flames would be abundant beforehand.

    The conclusions one can draw from this are mindboggling but not unfeasable.

    The millenium started with a clean slate, peace, prosperity and most of all hope for a future that would be more inclusive for all, regardless of race or class.



    It really is a fucked up world we live in.

  11. #11
    Hello World
    melvbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Infinite Loop
    Posts
    5,850
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife View Post
    Clearly it is a controlled explosion.
    The one thing that would go towards proving this theory is audio. A controlled explosion to implode a building of that size would have required those big noisy explosive things yet there isnt any audio on that footage. That would have removed all doubt.

  12. #12
    Thailand Expat Bobcock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,836
    Teak Door - Giving Wackjobs a Voice.

    Good policy too, who knows what their minds will dream up given freedom of the streets.

    DD is a modern hero.

  13. #13
    punk douche bag
    ChiangMai noon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    o dan y bryn
    Posts
    29,256
    ^
    I don't get that.

    If Larry Silverstein, the owner of the building says the decision was made to 'pull i't, then why would you believe it was anything other.



    certainly it's not only a bunch of wackjobs that have been asking questions about building 7.

    there is a group of over 100 highly respected structural engineers that are convinced it was pulled.

  14. #14
    Hello World
    melvbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Infinite Loop
    Posts
    5,850
    Quote Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon View Post

    there is a group of over 100 highly respected structural engineers that are convinced it was pulled.
    There are millions of people worldwide from the most respected politicians, authors and mathematicians etc that believe in God. Without any hard evidence just being convinced means very little.

  15. #15
    I'm in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-06-2021 @ 11:13 PM
    Posts
    39,826
    the whack job are those who keep believing in the official story, no matter how little sense it makes

  16. #16
    punk douche bag
    ChiangMai noon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    o dan y bryn
    Posts
    29,256
    Quote Originally Posted by melvbot
    There are millions of people worldwide from the most respected politicians, authors and mathematicians etc that believe in God. Without any hard evidence just being convinced means very little.
    i think silverstein's testimony is proof enough even if you ignore the blatant visual evidence and the historical lack of any building ever collapsing in its entirety from fire damage.

  17. #17
    punk douche bag
    ChiangMai noon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    o dan y bryn
    Posts
    29,256
    this is an excellent website..... Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth.

    AE911Truth

  18. #18
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    04-02-2026 @ 07:10 AM
    Posts
    6,950
    Quote Originally Posted by melvbot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife View Post
    Clearly it is a controlled explosion.
    The one thing that would go towards proving this theory is audio. A controlled explosion to implode a building of that size would have required those big noisy explosive things yet there isnt any audio on that footage. That would have removed all doubt.

    I take you haven't seen the clip where the firemen are running from the building as large explosions are heard then.

    So the video is fake? Are you saying WTC7 didn't happen, didn't fall in that way are what, because no one is denying the way it fell, just denying how it fell. Like i said, engineering science failed that day 3 times for the first time in history.



    Guess that was fake and some sad bastard with to much time on his hand had nothing to do.

    Watch the full documentarty.
    Last edited by Jesus Jones; 05-11-2008 at 10:33 AM.

  19. #19
    Hello World
    melvbot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Infinite Loop
    Posts
    5,850
    I take you haven seen the clip where the firemen are running from the building as large explosions are heard then.
    No I havent seen that video

    So the video is fake? Are you saying WTC7 didn't happen, didn't fall in that way are what, because no one is denying the way it fell, just denying how it fell. Like i said, engineering science failed that day 3 times for the first time in history.
    Thats just a tongue in cheek reference to CMN who believes the moon landings were faked in a Hollywood studio, nothing to get your knickers in a twist about.



    That is simply an explosion, I dont see or hear any reference to the WT7 building in that video.
    The Geek Shall Inherit The Earth

  20. #20
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    04-02-2026 @ 07:10 AM
    Posts
    6,950
    ^. The actual full video is shot by the firemen. The chief tells his men to get back as they confirm they have heard explosion and this it is going to drop. The full vid shows the firemen and their conversation as well as the building falling.

  21. #21
    Thailand Expat Jesus Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    04-02-2026 @ 07:10 AM
    Posts
    6,950

  22. #22
    I'm in Jail
    attaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    11-12-2013 @ 11:30 AM
    Posts
    4,042
    It could have been a shaft running up that portion of the building. As the building collapsed from the bottom air and debris was forced up the shaft and escaped out onto each floor blowing out the nearest windows.

  23. #23
    Days Work Done!
    Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:21 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    36,057
    These conspiracy theories are no doubt a religion to many but seems a little OTT to post em in the Religion Forum?

  24. #24
    Thailand Expat Texpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    13,063
    Welcome to TD, where the weird meets the stupid.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •