Thread: Bush: The Lack of Character Issue

The last three posts are great examples of the depravity and ignorance on Teak Door.

The membership of this forum should remember these posts when their sensitive feelings get hurt regarding other issues.

Yes, it would appear some peoples apparent distaste for waterboarding is quite selective.

Grand Total: 3

Total duration: 5 minutes


If you defend those posts, you're no better than them, depraved and ignorant.

Originally Posted by Texpat

Grand Total: 3

Total duration: 5 minutes

Don't get you there Tex?

But anyway, as I said above, if any poster argued against waterboarding & torture, and now advocates this treatment for dubya, or anyone else, it somewhat makes a mockery of their argument.

Young Harold killed 30 of them ragheads all by hisself!

Bet those thirty wish they had only been waterboarded.

Don't hear any calls for his head.

Wonder why? He's considered to have been honorably serving his country while killing those men. Dubya's never gotten near the bloodshed.

Psst 'scuse me miss, but your slip is showing.

OK. I take the water boarding comment back. GWB should be hung after a fair military tribunal. Perhaps after just a little encouragement to confess to his crimes, such as prolonged stress positions, sleep deprivation, and imprisonment for years without trial. We could throw in some softening up by extraordinary rendition to some Egyptian dungeon as well. Its all perfectly legal you know according to GWB himself, so long as its not done on US soil.

Originally Posted by sabang

Originally Posted by Texpat

Grand Total: 3

Total duration: 5 minutes

Don't get you there Tex?

But anyway, as I said above, if any poster argued against waterboarding & torture, and now advocates this treatment for dubya, or anyone else, it somewhat makes a mockery of their argument.

Could we advocate water boarding Rumsfeld then?

Originally Posted by Panda

Perhaps after just a little encouragement to confess to his crimes, such as prolonged stress positions, sleep deprivation, and imprisonment for years without trial.

Like this?



or this?


or this?



Oh, sorry, my bad. I thought you were talking about Harold, who was over there actually killing people.

Yes Prince Braveheart, shining armor and all.

You mean, Texpat, that you don't understand irony and humour? Of course I wouldn't want him waterboarded. Just retired would do.

I couldn't give a rats arse what happens to young Harry. He is just one of those parasitic royals left over from a bygone era.

No, he's a role-model for all British subjects, (includes canada and australia) running amock over thar in the desert killing folks.

But Bush, he's real bad.

Originally Posted by Morden

You mean, Texpat, that you don't understand irony and humour? Of course I wouldn't want him waterboarded. Just retired would do.

retired with 2 oz of lead behind the left ear would be better.

Think far better use of a bullet would be on your head.

Originally Posted by thehighlander959

All politics is a dirty game played by dirty people who all have one thing in common. THAT IS TO LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS AND FUCK EVERYONE ELSE!! It doesn,t matter which country you live in.

Sad but true .... it also seems the China model will out compete the corrupt western pocket lining democratic models

Originally Posted by Texpat

Originally Posted by Panda

Perhaps after just a little encouragement to confess to his crimes, such as prolonged stress positions, sleep deprivation, and imprisonment for years without trial.

Like this?



or this?


or this?



Oh, sorry, my bad. I thought you were talking about Harold, who was over there actually killing people.

Yes Prince Braveheart, shining armor and all.

Is that Harold in the pics? Is he trying to surf aboard a Talabani? Doesn't he know "Mohammed don't surf!"?

Originally Posted by Panda

I couldn't give a rats arse what happens to young Harry. He is just one of those parasitic royals left over from a bygone era.

It's sometimes alleged, but not necessarily by me, that neither of Harry's parents were born into the royal family.

Originally Posted by Texpat

No, he's a role-model for all British subjects, (includes canada and australia) running amock over thar in the desert killing folks.

But Bush, he's real bad.

Just for the record, Sir, I have the same contempt for any political leader who interferes in the affairs of other countries and sends people to their deaths for his own personal gain. That includes, therefore, Bush, his friends in government, Blair, Bin Laden and others. In case you aren't clear about what Bin Laden wants, it's personal power in Saudi Arabia - in the name of Allah of course. Bush is about oil, his friends aren't particular how they make their billions and Blair is getting his payoff now with well paid non-jobs - in the name of Christianity, if you remember the speeches.

Harry is a victim of the British Establishment, as is his brother. I had high hopes that he might continue his mother's work in shaking the foundations of the royal family because, as some say, he's not one of them. However, I fear that it's not to be. Don't be fooled, very few Brits see him in uniform as a role model. He's now the typical product of a privileged upbringing and that's not popular these days. Shame, a wasted opportunity. He really could be a good role model for young people if he were his own man.

Lets face it, if only for PR purposes, the universal chorus of approbation and contempt for Bush, Cheney and their ilk would be somewhat tempered if we were to see one single one of their Offspring or close family serving in Iraq, rather than milking the cash cow that their Daddy created whilst other young men are sent off to be part of the statistics.

There is something to be said for 'Leadership by example' you know. Harry, who as far as I'm concerned is just another bloke, but who happened to be born to Privilege (not unlike Dubya), was only pulled out of Iraq because his presence there was outed by the Press.

Originally Posted by sabang

Lets face it, if only for PR purposes, the universal chorus of approbation and contempt for Bush, Cheney and their ilk would be somewhat tempered if we were to see one single one of their Offspring or close family serving in Iraq, rather than milking the cash cow that their Daddy created whilst other young men are sent off to be part of the statistics. .

The same goes for Blair and his grasping family.

Originally Posted by sabang

Harry, who as far as I'm concerned is just another bloke, but who happened to be born to Privilege (not unlike Dubya), was only pulled out of Iraq because his presence there was outed by the Press.

Um ... afghanistan ...

and not till after he killed 30 of 'em.

^ Whoops. I'd better not criticise Amerkins for lack of geographical knowledge anymore.

You failed to mention that Harry killed them with his bare hands.

Originally Posted by sabang

You failed to mention that Harry killed them with his bare hands.

I thought he used a tea cup?