Quote Originally Posted by John L View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Hootad Binky View Post
Quote Originally Posted by John L View Post
As I clearly showed earlier, the Hockey Stick has been proven to be a fraud. Got that: A FRAUD! that is why the latest IPCC report did not post it in the report. It's A FRAUD!
Well I got my hockey stick from Scientific American, which I presume is also a fraud and found this article in Nature, the journal that first published Darwin's Origin of the Species and reads:

Academy affirms hockey-stick graph

Access : : Nature
It refers to these findings, when the National Research Council reported:

"It can be said with a high level of confidence that global mean surface temperature was higher during the last few decades of the 20th century than during any comparable period during the preceding four centuries. This statement is justified by the consistency of the evidence from a wide variety of geographically diverse proxies."

NRC - The National Research Council

Quote Originally Posted by John L View Post
if you can't refute the evidence
The evidence is not in dispute! The data is clear and self-evident: the planet is heating up, poles are melting and ever-increasing speeds, sea levels are rising. Many of the links you provided said exactly that!
Quote Originally Posted by John L View Post
you demonize the character of the messenger.
With labels like "ignorant" and "Leftie" and "lazy," right?
Sooo, again you were too intellectually lazy to bother reading the links showing the Hocky Stick to be a fraud? Why am I not surprised? You are not only dishonest, but a lazy one at that.
I read every link you posted; most agreed with my position. I've clearly demonstrated that. The others were links to Conservative blogs.

By "fraud" I presume you mean that everything on the graph was false, or some of it was in dispute?

By definition, then, Nature article and the National Research Council 2006 report I cited are also "a fraud."

Yes or no?